From: Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>
To: mingo@redhat.com, yinghai@kernel.org, rientjes@google.com,
tglx@linutronix.de, hpa@zytor.com, x86@kernel.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Cc: Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>
Subject: [PATCH 08/25] x86, NUMA: trivial cleanups
Date: Fri, 29 Apr 2011 17:28:27 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1304090924-8197-9-git-send-email-tj@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1304090924-8197-1-git-send-email-tj@kernel.org>
* Kill no longer used struct bootnode.
* Kill dangling declaration of pxm_to_nid() in numa_32.h.
* Make setup_node_bootmem() static.
Signed-off-by: Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>
Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>
Cc: Yinghai Lu <yinghai@kernel.org>
Cc: David Rientjes <rientjes@google.com>
Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Cc: "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@zytor.com>
---
arch/x86/include/asm/acpi.h | 2 --
arch/x86/include/asm/amd_nb.h | 1 -
arch/x86/include/asm/numa_32.h | 2 --
arch/x86/include/asm/numa_64.h | 7 -------
arch/x86/mm/numa_64.c | 2 +-
5 files changed, 1 insertions(+), 13 deletions(-)
diff --git a/arch/x86/include/asm/acpi.h b/arch/x86/include/asm/acpi.h
index 12e0e7d..416d865 100644
--- a/arch/x86/include/asm/acpi.h
+++ b/arch/x86/include/asm/acpi.h
@@ -183,8 +183,6 @@ static inline void disable_acpi(void) { }
#define ARCH_HAS_POWER_INIT 1
-struct bootnode;
-
#ifdef CONFIG_ACPI_NUMA
extern int acpi_numa;
extern int x86_acpi_numa_init(void);
diff --git a/arch/x86/include/asm/amd_nb.h b/arch/x86/include/asm/amd_nb.h
index 3316822..67f87f2 100644
--- a/arch/x86/include/asm/amd_nb.h
+++ b/arch/x86/include/asm/amd_nb.h
@@ -11,7 +11,6 @@ struct amd_nb_bus_dev_range {
extern const struct pci_device_id amd_nb_misc_ids[];
extern const struct amd_nb_bus_dev_range amd_nb_bus_dev_ranges[];
-struct bootnode;
extern bool early_is_amd_nb(u32 value);
extern int amd_cache_northbridges(void);
diff --git a/arch/x86/include/asm/numa_32.h b/arch/x86/include/asm/numa_32.h
index 242522f..7e54b64 100644
--- a/arch/x86/include/asm/numa_32.h
+++ b/arch/x86/include/asm/numa_32.h
@@ -3,8 +3,6 @@
extern int numa_off;
-extern int pxm_to_nid(int pxm);
-
#ifdef CONFIG_HIGHMEM
extern void set_highmem_pages_init(void);
#else
diff --git a/arch/x86/include/asm/numa_64.h b/arch/x86/include/asm/numa_64.h
index 12461eb..794da6d 100644
--- a/arch/x86/include/asm/numa_64.h
+++ b/arch/x86/include/asm/numa_64.h
@@ -3,18 +3,11 @@
#include <linux/nodemask.h>
-struct bootnode {
- u64 start;
- u64 end;
-};
-
#define ZONE_ALIGN (1UL << (MAX_ORDER+PAGE_SHIFT))
extern int numa_off;
extern unsigned long numa_free_all_bootmem(void);
-extern void setup_node_bootmem(int nodeid, unsigned long start,
- unsigned long end);
#ifdef CONFIG_NUMA
/*
diff --git a/arch/x86/mm/numa_64.c b/arch/x86/mm/numa_64.c
index 3598fbf..813a161 100644
--- a/arch/x86/mm/numa_64.c
+++ b/arch/x86/mm/numa_64.c
@@ -95,7 +95,7 @@ int __init numa_add_memblk(int nid, u64 start, u64 end)
}
/* Initialize bootmem allocator for a node */
-void __init
+static void __init
setup_node_bootmem(int nid, unsigned long start, unsigned long end)
{
const u64 nd_low = (u64)MAX_DMA_PFN << PAGE_SHIFT;
--
1.7.1
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2011-04-29 15:29 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 43+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2011-04-29 15:28 [PATCHSET tip] x86, NUMA: Unify 32 and 64bit NUMA initialization Tejun Heo
2011-04-29 15:28 ` [PATCH 01/25] x86-64, NUMA: Simplify hotadd memory handling Tejun Heo
2011-04-29 15:28 ` [PATCH 02/25] x86-64, NUMA: trivial cleanups for setup_node_bootmem() Tejun Heo
2011-04-29 15:28 ` [PATCH 03/25] x86-64, NUMA: simplify nodedata allocation Tejun Heo
2011-04-29 17:23 ` Yinghai Lu
2011-04-30 12:02 ` Tejun Heo
2011-04-29 15:28 ` [PATCH 04/25] x86-32, NUMA: Automatically set apicid -> node in setup_local_APIC() Tejun Heo
2011-04-29 15:28 ` [PATCH 05/25] x86, NUMA: Unify 32/64bit numa_cpu_node() implementation Tejun Heo
2011-04-29 15:28 ` [PATCH 06/25] x86-32, NUMA: Make apic->x86_32_numa_cpu_node() optional Tejun Heo
2011-04-29 15:28 ` [PATCH 07/25] x86-32, NUMA: use sparse_memory_present_with_active_regions() Tejun Heo
2011-04-29 15:28 ` Tejun Heo [this message]
2011-04-29 17:25 ` [PATCH 08/25] x86, NUMA: trivial cleanups Yinghai Lu
2011-04-30 12:03 ` Tejun Heo
2011-04-30 16:24 ` Yinghai Lu
2011-04-30 18:00 ` Tejun Heo
2011-04-30 23:10 ` Yinghai Lu
2011-04-30 23:11 ` [PATCH] x86, numa: Rename setup_node_bootmem to setup_node_data Yinghai Lu
2011-04-29 15:28 ` [PATCH 09/25] x86, NUMA: rename srat_64.c to srat.c Tejun Heo
2011-04-29 15:28 ` [PATCH 10/25] x86, NUMA: make srat.c 32bit safe Tejun Heo
2011-04-29 15:28 ` [PATCH 11/25] x86-32, NUMA: Move get_memcfg_numa() into numa_32.c Tejun Heo
2011-04-29 15:28 ` [PATCH 12/25] x86, NUMA: Move numa_nodes_parsed to numa.[hc] Tejun Heo
2011-04-29 15:28 ` [PATCH 13/25] x86-32, NUMA: implement temporary NUMA init shims Tejun Heo
2011-04-29 15:28 ` [PATCH 14/25] x86-32, NUMA: Replace srat_32.c with srat.c Tejun Heo
2011-04-29 15:28 ` [PATCH 15/25] x86-32, NUMA: Update numaq to use new NUMA init protocol Tejun Heo
2011-04-29 15:28 ` [PATCH 16/25] x86, NUMA: Move NUMA init logic from numa_64.c to numa.c Tejun Heo
2011-04-29 15:28 ` [PATCH 17/25] x86, NUMA: Enable build of generic NUMA init code on 32bit Tejun Heo
2011-04-29 15:28 ` [PATCH 18/25] x86, NUMA: Remove long 64bit assumption from numa.c Tejun Heo
2011-04-29 15:28 ` [PATCH 19/25] x86-32, NUMA: Add @start and @end to init_alloc_remap() Tejun Heo
2011-04-29 15:28 ` [PATCH 20/25] x86, NUMA: Initialize and use remap allocator from setup_node_bootmem() Tejun Heo
2011-04-29 15:28 ` [PATCH 21/25] x86, NUMA: Make 32bit use common NUMA init path Tejun Heo
2011-04-29 15:28 ` [PATCH 22/25] x86, NUMA: Make numa_init_array() static Tejun Heo
2011-04-29 15:28 ` [PATCH 23/25] x86, NUMA: Rename amdtopology_64.c to amdtopology.c Tejun Heo
2011-04-29 15:28 ` [PATCH 24/25] x86, NUMA: Enable CONFIG_AMD_NUMA on 32bit too Tejun Heo
2011-04-29 15:28 ` [PATCH 25/25] x86, NUMA: Enable emulation " Tejun Heo
2011-04-29 18:15 ` [PATCHSET tip] x86, NUMA: Unify 32 and 64bit NUMA initialization Ingo Molnar
2011-04-29 20:14 ` Yinghai Lu
2011-04-30 12:17 ` Tejun Heo
2011-04-30 12:33 ` [PATCH] x86, NUMA: Fix empty memblk detection in numa_cleanup_meminfo() Tejun Heo
2011-04-30 12:35 ` Tejun Heo
2011-05-01 0:43 ` Yinghai Lu
2011-05-01 10:20 ` Tejun Heo
2011-05-01 19:44 ` [PATCH] x86, numa: Trim numa meminfo with max_pfn in separated loop Yinghai Lu
2011-04-30 16:31 ` [PATCHSET tip] x86, NUMA: Unify 32 and 64bit NUMA initialization Yinghai Lu
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1304090924-8197-9-git-send-email-tj@kernel.org \
--to=tj@kernel.org \
--cc=hpa@zytor.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@redhat.com \
--cc=rientjes@google.com \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
--cc=x86@kernel.org \
--cc=yinghai@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox