* Request for review and addition of PTI implementation into kernel
@ 2011-05-06 23:56 james_p_freyensee
2011-05-07 0:33 ` Greg KH
0 siblings, 1 reply; 4+ messages in thread
From: james_p_freyensee @ 2011-05-06 23:56 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gregkh; +Cc: linux-kernel, suhail.ahmed, christophe.guerard, james_p_freyensee
>From james_p_freyensee@linux.intel.com # This line is ignored.
From: james_p_freyensee@linux.intel.com
Subject: Request for review and addition of PTI implementation into kernel
In-Reply-To: james_p_freyensee@linux.intel.com
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread
* Re: Request for review and addition of PTI implementation into kernel
2011-05-06 23:56 Request for review and addition of PTI implementation into kernel james_p_freyensee
@ 2011-05-07 0:33 ` Greg KH
2011-05-09 19:07 ` J Freyensee
0 siblings, 1 reply; 4+ messages in thread
From: Greg KH @ 2011-05-07 0:33 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: james_p_freyensee; +Cc: linux-kernel, suhail.ahmed, christophe.guerard
On Fri, May 06, 2011 at 04:56:46PM -0700, james_p_freyensee@linux.intel.com wrote:
> >From james_p_freyensee@linux.intel.com # This line is ignored.
> From: james_p_freyensee@linux.intel.com
> Subject: Request for review and addition of PTI implementation into kernel
> In-Reply-To: james_p_freyensee@linux.intel.com
What was this?
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread
* Re: Request for review and addition of PTI implementation into kernel
2011-05-07 0:33 ` Greg KH
@ 2011-05-09 19:07 ` J Freyensee
0 siblings, 0 replies; 4+ messages in thread
From: J Freyensee @ 2011-05-09 19:07 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Greg KH; +Cc: linux-kernel, suhail.ahmed, christophe.guerard
On Fri, 2011-05-06 at 17:33 -0700, Greg KH wrote:
> On Fri, May 06, 2011 at 04:56:46PM -0700, james_p_freyensee@linux.intel.com wrote:
> > >From james_p_freyensee@linux.intel.com # This line is ignored.
> > From: james_p_freyensee@linux.intel.com
> > Subject: Request for review and addition of PTI implementation into kernel
> > In-Reply-To: james_p_freyensee@linux.intel.com
>
> What was this?
That's a good question...I guess that didn't come out well :-/.
It was just a summary of the latest patches I submitted on Friday,
highlighting that the summary of changes this time were mainly cosmetic.
Nothing to patch against the kernel.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread
* Request for review and addition of PTI implementation into kernel
@ 2011-04-22 23:32 james_p_freyensee
0 siblings, 0 replies; 4+ messages in thread
From: james_p_freyensee @ 2011-04-22 23:32 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gregkh; +Cc: linux-kernel, suhail.ahmed, james_p_freyensee, christophe.guerard
This is a fourth submission and inclusion request into the mainline
kernel. Fixes include mainly style issues pointed out in the last
review.
From: james_p_freyensee@linux.intel.com
Subject: Request for review and addition of PTI implementation into kernel
In-Reply-To: james_p_freyensee@linux.intel.com
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2011-05-09 19:07 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2011-05-06 23:56 Request for review and addition of PTI implementation into kernel james_p_freyensee
2011-05-07 0:33 ` Greg KH
2011-05-09 19:07 ` J Freyensee
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2011-04-22 23:32 james_p_freyensee
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).