public inbox for linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
To: Nikhil Rao <ncrao@google.com>
Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>, Mike Galbraith <efault@gmx.de>,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	"Nikunj A. Dadhania" <nikunj@linux.vnet.ibm.com>,
	Srivatsa Vaddagiri <vatsa@linux.vnet.ibm.com>,
	Stephan Barwolf <stephan.baerwolf@tu-ilmenau.de>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v1 00/19] Increase resolution of load weights
Date: Thu, 12 May 2011 11:08:20 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <1305191300.2914.263.camel@laptop> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <BANLkTi=rnOZb-E35SC5B9Xb3SXMwFZi=Fg@mail.gmail.com>

On Thu, 2011-05-05 at 18:29 -0700, Nikhil Rao wrote:
> > It's a cost/benefit analysis and for 32-bit systems the benefits seem to be
> > rather small, right?
> >
> 
> Yes, that's right. The benefits for 32-bit systems do seem to be limited.

deep(er) hierarchies on 32 bits still require this, it would be good to
verify that the cgroup mess created by the insanity called libvirt will
indeed work as expected.




  parent reply	other threads:[~2011-05-12  9:05 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 34+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2011-05-02  1:18 [PATCH v1 00/19] Increase resolution of load weights Nikhil Rao
2011-05-02  1:18 ` [PATCH v1 01/19] sched: introduce SCHED_POWER_SCALE to scale cpu_power calculations Nikhil Rao
2011-05-02  1:19 ` [PATCH v1 02/19] sched: increase SCHED_LOAD_SCALE resolution Nikhil Rao
2011-05-02  1:19 ` [PATCH v1 03/19] sched: use u64 for load_weight fields Nikhil Rao
2011-05-02  1:19 ` [PATCH v1 04/19] sched: update cpu_load to be u64 Nikhil Rao
2011-05-02  1:19 ` [PATCH v1 05/19] sched: update this_cpu_load() to return u64 value Nikhil Rao
2011-05-02  1:19 ` [PATCH v1 06/19] sched: update source_load(), target_load() and weighted_cpuload() to use u64 Nikhil Rao
2011-05-02  1:19 ` [PATCH v1 07/19] sched: update find_idlest_cpu() to use u64 for load Nikhil Rao
2011-05-02  1:19 ` [PATCH v1 08/19] sched: update find_idlest_group() to use u64 Nikhil Rao
2011-05-02  1:19 ` [PATCH v1 09/19] sched: update division in cpu_avg_load_per_task to use div_u64 Nikhil Rao
2011-05-02  1:19 ` [PATCH v1 10/19] sched: update wake_affine path to use u64, s64 for weights Nikhil Rao
2011-05-02  1:19 ` [PATCH v1 11/19] sched: update update_sg_lb_stats() to use u64 Nikhil Rao
2011-05-02  1:19 ` [PATCH v1 12/19] sched: Update update_sd_lb_stats() " Nikhil Rao
2011-05-02  1:19 ` [PATCH v1 13/19] sched: update f_b_g() to use u64 for weights Nikhil Rao
2011-05-02  1:19 ` [PATCH v1 14/19] sched: change type of imbalance to be u64 Nikhil Rao
2011-05-02  1:19 ` [PATCH v1 15/19] sched: update h_load to use u64 Nikhil Rao
2011-05-02  1:19 ` [PATCH v1 16/19] sched: update move_task() and helper functions to use u64 for weights Nikhil Rao
2011-05-02  1:19 ` [PATCH v1 17/19] sched: update f_b_q() to use u64 for weighted cpuload Nikhil Rao
2011-05-02  1:19 ` [PATCH v1 18/19] sched: update shares distribution to use u64 Nikhil Rao
2011-05-02  1:19 ` [PATCH v1 19/19] sched: convert atomic ops in shares update to use atomic64_t ops Nikhil Rao
2011-05-02  6:14 ` [PATCH v1 00/19] Increase resolution of load weights Ingo Molnar
2011-05-04  0:58   ` Nikhil Rao
2011-05-04  1:07     ` Nikhil Rao
2011-05-04 11:13     ` Ingo Molnar
2011-05-06  1:29       ` Nikhil Rao
2011-05-06  6:59         ` Ingo Molnar
2011-05-11  0:14           ` Nikhil Rao
2011-05-11  6:59             ` Ingo Molnar
2011-05-12  8:56               ` Nikhil Rao
2011-05-12 10:55                 ` Ingo Molnar
2011-05-12 18:44                   ` Nikhil Rao
2011-05-12  9:08         ` Peter Zijlstra [this message]
2011-05-12 17:30           ` Nikhil Rao
2011-05-13  7:19             ` Peter Zijlstra

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=1305191300.2914.263.camel@laptop \
    --to=peterz@infradead.org \
    --cc=efault@gmx.de \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mingo@elte.hu \
    --cc=ncrao@google.com \
    --cc=nikunj@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
    --cc=stephan.baerwolf@tu-ilmenau.de \
    --cc=vatsa@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox