From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1756078Ab1EWPbB (ORCPT ); Mon, 23 May 2011 11:31:01 -0400 Received: from casper.infradead.org ([85.118.1.10]:56909 "EHLO casper.infradead.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1755087Ab1EWPbA convert rfc822-to-8bit (ORCPT ); Mon, 23 May 2011 11:31:00 -0400 Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/3] perf_events: update extra shared registers management (v2) From: Peter Zijlstra To: Stephane Eranian Cc: LKML , "mingo@elte.hu" , Andi Kleen , Lin Ming In-Reply-To: References: <20110520143707.GA5347@quad> <1306141897.18455.8.camel@twins> <1306143168.18455.10.camel@twins> <1306149026.18455.11.camel@twins> <1306163700.18455.16.camel@twins> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8BIT Date: Mon, 23 May 2011 17:30:29 +0200 Message-ID: <1306164629.18455.19.camel@twins> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Evolution 2.30.3 Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Mon, 2011-05-23 at 17:27 +0200, Stephane Eranian wrote: > Ok, my fault. That's because I tweaked your patch a bit and > I did not keep track of idx. AH! Ok, at least its not my brain that's broken, was starting to doubt my sanity there for a moment ;-) > I guess the logic is not obvious. > I think you should rename idx to orig_idx. Indeed, that would clarify things. Thanks!