From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1753421AbaFDOCO (ORCPT ); Wed, 4 Jun 2014 10:02:14 -0400 Received: from mout.kundenserver.de ([212.227.126.187]:52996 "EHLO mout.kundenserver.de" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752508AbaFDOCL (ORCPT ); Wed, 4 Jun 2014 10:02:11 -0400 From: Arnd Bergmann To: Will Deacon Cc: Thierry Reding , Hiroshi Doyu , Rob Herring , Rob Herring , Pawel Moll , Mark Rutland , Ian Campbell , Kumar Gala , Cho KyongHo , Grant Grundler , Dave P Martin , Marc Zyngier , Joerg Roedel , Stephen Warren , "devicetree@vger.kernel.org" , Linux IOMMU , "linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org" , "linux-tegra@vger.kernel.org" , "linux-samsung-soc@vger.kernel.org" , "linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] devicetree: Add generic IOMMU device tree bindings Date: Wed, 04 Jun 2014 16:01:15 +0200 Message-ID: <13061821.NYx1AfEhs0@wuerfel> User-Agent: KMail/4.11.5 (Linux/3.11.0-18-generic; KDE/4.11.5; x86_64; ; ) In-Reply-To: <20140604135600.GD6644@arm.com> References: <1400877218-4113-1-git-send-email-thierry.reding@gmail.com> <20140604134400.GE28484@ulmo> <20140604135600.GD6644@arm.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7Bit Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" X-Provags-ID: V02:K0:qWnIXSSICJVOyyqcD28A2SoGkcDbCLhC1oZT8fwXeYd 3vaNuPlEi4BHSqcY9q6AuS37noq18NkSR1y57MIVxSu6IYRP3w FBvdEYQi2pfKpjYB4XrJ81OjlYp+v4OVunkSlZuh34nusFv+44 U+nf0cq1tZZfUJzVilFkIqY54xxZ0FtZa8F3Qbq0Sa6nsH9GEp mtseMwxYfihaDLmDPJMnnVbsiz3NM5ek10C+ZcsSQc8VQCMGS0 XTgHvniiWbO4ZfFKGDnESGBi3qj8+V8Mp66AIdseMIsorPRde9 l01WQv6Fv4QFypoYcJyS7cWvF2AU7umUSdoX0Rgy+iCl7icD9G fJNhZVhU2ksYYludRNnM= Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Wednesday 04 June 2014 14:56:01 Will Deacon wrote: > On Wed, Jun 04, 2014 at 02:44:03PM +0100, Thierry Reding wrote: > > On Fri, May 30, 2014 at 09:54:37PM +0200, Arnd Bergmann wrote: > > > On Friday 30 May 2014 22:29:13 Hiroshi Doyu wrote: > > > > The disadvantage of this is that this limits the max number of streamIDs > > > > to support. If # of streamID is increased later more than 64, this > > > > format cannot cover any more. You have to predict the max # of streamIDs > > > > in advance if steamID is statically assigned. > > > > > > > > > > Well, the iommu specific binding could allow a variable #address-cells. > > > That way, you just need to know the number of stream IDs for that instance > > > of the iommu. > > > > That sounds fairly complicated to me. I don't see what that buys us over > > the clarity and simplicity that the above explicit notation gives us. Is > > it not more common for a device to have a single master rather than a > > whole bunch of them? > > I've never seen a device upstream of an ARM SMMU with a single stream-id; > they always seem to have a whole bunch of them. Calxeda's SATA controller > had 10 IDs, for example, and a PL330 DMA controller tends to have at least > 3. What are those good for? Would we just always use the first one? Arnd