From: James Bottomley <James.Bottomley@HansenPartnership.com>
To: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
Cc: Parag Warudkar <parag.lkml@gmail.com>,
Jens Axboe <jaxboe@fusionio.com>,
"linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
"akpm@linux-foundation.org" <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
Linux SCSI List <linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] SCSI IOCTL: Check for device deletion [was Re: __elv_add_request OOPS]
Date: Wed, 25 May 2011 20:06:04 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1306371965.1641.79.camel@mulgrave.site> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <BANLkTi=YW91=mj6KVUia6ykgEJ8DNEmbUA@mail.gmail.com>
On Wed, 2011-05-25 at 18:01 -0700, Linus Torvalds wrote:
> On Wed, May 25, 2011 at 5:35 PM, James Bottomley
> <James.Bottomley@hansenpartnership.com> wrote: > > Jens, can you look
> at this, please ... would you prefer a separate DEAD > test instead?
> Incidentally, this is in addition to the other DEAD test > you still
> haven't applied ...
>
> Ugh.
>
> Can you please just always set STOPPED at the same time you set DEAD?
Well, Jens wondered the same thing in this thread:
http://marc.info/?l=linux-scsi&m=130632292705404
It's just an RFC patch to see if I can fix an oops ... how it's
ultimately implemented will be up to Jens.
James
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2011-05-26 1:06 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 31+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2011-05-24 4:29 __elv_add_request OOPS Parag Warudkar
2011-05-24 10:44 ` Jens Axboe
2011-05-25 1:41 ` [PATCH] SCSI IOCTL: Check for device deletion [was Re: __elv_add_request OOPS] Parag Warudkar
2011-05-25 7:37 ` Jens Axboe
2011-05-25 18:44 ` Parag Warudkar
2011-05-25 18:55 ` Linus Torvalds
2011-05-25 19:02 ` Jens Axboe
2011-05-25 19:13 ` Linus Torvalds
2011-05-25 19:17 ` Jens Axboe
2011-05-25 19:52 ` Parag Warudkar
2011-05-25 20:03 ` Linus Torvalds
2011-05-25 20:18 ` Parag Warudkar
2011-05-25 20:26 ` Linus Torvalds
2011-05-25 20:42 ` Parag Warudkar
2011-05-25 20:52 ` James Bottomley
2011-05-25 23:00 ` Parag Warudkar
2011-05-25 23:14 ` Linus Torvalds
2011-05-25 23:45 ` Parag Warudkar
2011-05-25 23:52 ` Linus Torvalds
[not found] ` <1306370123.1641.76.camel@mulgrave.site>
2011-05-26 1:01 ` Linus Torvalds
2011-05-26 1:06 ` James Bottomley [this message]
2011-05-26 1:43 ` Parag Warudkar
2011-05-27 3:53 ` James Bottomley
2011-05-27 5:43 ` Jens Axboe
2011-05-27 20:21 ` James Bottomley
2011-05-28 12:42 ` Jens Axboe
2011-06-08 6:50 ` Torsten Hilbrich
2011-05-25 20:20 ` James Bottomley
2011-05-25 20:22 ` Parag Warudkar
2011-05-25 20:29 ` James Bottomley
2011-05-25 20:26 ` __elv_add_request OOPS James Bottomley
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1306371965.1641.79.camel@mulgrave.site \
--to=james.bottomley@hansenpartnership.com \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=jaxboe@fusionio.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=parag.lkml@gmail.com \
--cc=torvalds@linux-foundation.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox