public inbox for linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
To: Damien Wyart <damien.wyart@free.fr>
Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>, Mike Galbraith <efault@gmx.de>,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	paulmck <paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Subject: Re: Very high CPU load when idle with 3.0-rc1
Date: Mon, 30 May 2011 13:34:51 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <1306755291.1200.2872.camel@twins> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20110530055924.GA9169@brouette>

On Mon, 2011-05-30 at 07:59 +0200, Damien Wyart wrote:
> Hi,
> 
> Testing 3.0-rc1 on a core i7 (4 cores + HT), I get a load average of 9.0
> when idle. No process is shown running or in "D state" in htop. The box
> is behaving normal, no impression of lag or slowness.
> 
> Not sure what other info to include, I guess this should be quite easy
> to reproduce.


---
Subject: rcu: Cure load woes

Commit cc3ce5176d83 (rcu: Start RCU kthreads in TASK_INTERRUPTIBLE
state) fudges a sleeping task' state, resulting in the scheduler seeing
a TASK_UNINTERRUPTIBLE task going to sleep, but a TASK_INTERRUPTIBLE
task waking up. The result is unbalanced load calculation.

The problem that patch tried to address is that the RCU threads could
stay in UNINTERRUPTIBLE state for quite a while and triggering the hung
task detector due to on-demand wake-ups.

Cure the problem differently by always giving the tasks at least one
wake-up once the CPU is fully up and running, this will kick them out of
the initial UNINTERRUPTIBLE state and into the regular INTERRUPTIBLE
wait state.

The alternative would be teaching kthread_create() to start threads as
INTERRUPTIBLE but that needs a tad more thought.

Reported-by: Damien Wyart <damien.wyart@free.fr>
Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl>
---
 kernel/rcutree.c        |   54 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-------
 kernel/rcutree_plugin.h |   11 ++++++++-
 2 files changed, 56 insertions(+), 9 deletions(-)

diff --git a/kernel/rcutree.c b/kernel/rcutree.c
index 77a7671..89419ff 100644
--- a/kernel/rcutree.c
+++ b/kernel/rcutree.c
@@ -1648,7 +1648,6 @@ static int __cpuinit rcu_spawn_one_cpu_kthread(int cpu)
 	if (IS_ERR(t))
 		return PTR_ERR(t);
 	kthread_bind(t, cpu);
-	set_task_state(t, TASK_INTERRUPTIBLE);
 	per_cpu(rcu_cpu_kthread_cpu, cpu) = cpu;
 	WARN_ON_ONCE(per_cpu(rcu_cpu_kthread_task, cpu) != NULL);
 	per_cpu(rcu_cpu_kthread_task, cpu) = t;
@@ -1756,7 +1755,6 @@ static int __cpuinit rcu_spawn_one_node_kthread(struct rcu_state *rsp,
 		if (IS_ERR(t))
 			return PTR_ERR(t);
 		raw_spin_lock_irqsave(&rnp->lock, flags);
-		set_task_state(t, TASK_INTERRUPTIBLE);
 		rnp->node_kthread_task = t;
 		raw_spin_unlock_irqrestore(&rnp->lock, flags);
 		sp.sched_priority = 99;
@@ -1765,6 +1763,8 @@ static int __cpuinit rcu_spawn_one_node_kthread(struct rcu_state *rsp,
 	return rcu_spawn_one_boost_kthread(rsp, rnp, rnp_index);
 }
 
+static void rcu_wake_one_boost_kthread(struct rcu_node *rnp);
+
 /*
  * Spawn all kthreads -- called as soon as the scheduler is running.
  */
@@ -1772,18 +1772,30 @@ static int __init rcu_spawn_kthreads(void)
 {
 	int cpu;
 	struct rcu_node *rnp;
+	struct task_struct *t;
 
 	rcu_kthreads_spawnable = 1;
 	for_each_possible_cpu(cpu) {
 		per_cpu(rcu_cpu_has_work, cpu) = 0;
-		if (cpu_online(cpu))
+		if (cpu_online(cpu)) {
 			(void)rcu_spawn_one_cpu_kthread(cpu);
+			t = per_cpu(rcu_cpu_kthread_task, cpu);
+			if (t)
+				wake_up_process(t);
+		}
 	}
 	rnp = rcu_get_root(rcu_state);
 	(void)rcu_spawn_one_node_kthread(rcu_state, rnp);
+	if (rnp->node_kthread_task)
+		wake_up_process(rnp->node_kthread_task);
 	if (NUM_RCU_NODES > 1) {
-		rcu_for_each_leaf_node(rcu_state, rnp)
+		rcu_for_each_leaf_node(rcu_state, rnp) {
 			(void)rcu_spawn_one_node_kthread(rcu_state, rnp);
+			t = rnp->node_kthread_task;
+			if (t)
+				wake_up_process(t);
+			rcu_wake_one_boost_kthread(rnp);
+		}
 	}
 	return 0;
 }
@@ -2188,14 +2200,14 @@ rcu_init_percpu_data(int cpu, struct rcu_state *rsp, int preemptible)
 	raw_spin_unlock_irqrestore(&rsp->onofflock, flags);
 }
 
-static void __cpuinit rcu_online_cpu(int cpu)
+static void __cpuinit rcu_prepare_cpu(int cpu)
 {
 	rcu_init_percpu_data(cpu, &rcu_sched_state, 0);
 	rcu_init_percpu_data(cpu, &rcu_bh_state, 0);
 	rcu_preempt_init_percpu_data(cpu);
 }
 
-static void __cpuinit rcu_online_kthreads(int cpu)
+static void __cpuinit rcu_prepare_kthreads(int cpu)
 {
 	struct rcu_data *rdp = per_cpu_ptr(rcu_state->rda, cpu);
 	struct rcu_node *rnp = rdp->mynode;
@@ -2209,6 +2221,31 @@ static void __cpuinit rcu_online_kthreads(int cpu)
 }
 
 /*
+ * kthread_create() creates threads in TASK_UNINTERRUPTIBLE state,
+ * but the RCU threads are woken on demand, and if demand is low this
+ * could be a while triggering the hung task watchdog.
+ *
+ * In order to avoid this, poke all tasks once the CPU is fully
+ * up and running.
+ */
+static void __cpuinit rcu_online_kthreads(int cpu)
+{
+	struct rcu_data *rdp = per_cpu_ptr(rcu_state->rda, cpu);
+	struct rcu_node *rnp = rdp->mynode;
+	struct task_struct *t;
+
+	t = per_cpu(rcu_cpu_kthread_task, cpu);
+	if (t)
+		wake_up_process(t);
+
+	t = rnp->node_kthread_task;
+	if (t)
+		wake_up_process(t);
+
+	rcu_wake_one_boost_kthread(rnp);
+}
+
+/*
  * Handle CPU online/offline notification events.
  */
 static int __cpuinit rcu_cpu_notify(struct notifier_block *self,
@@ -2221,10 +2258,11 @@ static int __cpuinit rcu_cpu_notify(struct notifier_block *self,
 	switch (action) {
 	case CPU_UP_PREPARE:
 	case CPU_UP_PREPARE_FROZEN:
-		rcu_online_cpu(cpu);
-		rcu_online_kthreads(cpu);
+		rcu_prepare_cpu(cpu);
+		rcu_prepare_kthreads(cpu);
 		break;
 	case CPU_ONLINE:
+		rcu_online_kthreads(cpu);
 	case CPU_DOWN_FAILED:
 		rcu_node_kthread_setaffinity(rnp, -1);
 		rcu_cpu_kthread_setrt(cpu, 1);
diff --git a/kernel/rcutree_plugin.h b/kernel/rcutree_plugin.h
index a767b7d..2910de7 100644
--- a/kernel/rcutree_plugin.h
+++ b/kernel/rcutree_plugin.h
@@ -1295,7 +1295,6 @@ static int __cpuinit rcu_spawn_one_boost_kthread(struct rcu_state *rsp,
 	if (IS_ERR(t))
 		return PTR_ERR(t);
 	raw_spin_lock_irqsave(&rnp->lock, flags);
-	set_task_state(t, TASK_INTERRUPTIBLE);
 	rnp->boost_kthread_task = t;
 	raw_spin_unlock_irqrestore(&rnp->lock, flags);
 	sp.sched_priority = RCU_KTHREAD_PRIO;
@@ -1303,6 +1302,12 @@ static int __cpuinit rcu_spawn_one_boost_kthread(struct rcu_state *rsp,
 	return 0;
 }
 
+static void __cpuinit rcu_wake_one_boost_kthread(struct rcu_node *rnp)
+{
+	if (rnp->boost_kthread_task)
+		wake_up_process(rnp->boost_thread_task);
+}
+
 #else /* #ifdef CONFIG_RCU_BOOST */
 
 static void rcu_initiate_boost(struct rcu_node *rnp, unsigned long flags)
@@ -1326,6 +1331,10 @@ static int __cpuinit rcu_spawn_one_boost_kthread(struct rcu_state *rsp,
 	return 0;
 }
 
+static void __cpuinit rcu_wake_one_boost_kthread(struct rcu_node *rnp)
+{
+}
+
 #endif /* #else #ifdef CONFIG_RCU_BOOST */
 
 #ifndef CONFIG_SMP


  reply	other threads:[~2011-05-30 11:35 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 22+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2011-05-30  5:59 Very high CPU load when idle with 3.0-rc1 Damien Wyart
2011-05-30 11:34 ` Peter Zijlstra [this message]
2011-05-30 12:17   ` Ingo Molnar
2011-05-30 13:10   ` Mike Galbraith
2011-05-30 16:23   ` Paul E. McKenney
2011-05-30 16:41     ` Paul E. McKenney
2011-05-30 16:47       ` Peter Zijlstra
2011-05-30 16:46     ` Peter Zijlstra
2011-05-30 21:29       ` Paul E. McKenney
2011-05-30 21:35         ` Peter Zijlstra
2011-05-31  1:45           ` Paul E. McKenney
2011-05-30 17:19     ` Peter Zijlstra
2011-05-30 21:28       ` Paul E. McKenney
2011-05-30 21:33         ` Peter Zijlstra
2011-05-31  1:45           ` Paul E. McKenney
2011-06-01 11:05             ` Peter Zijlstra
2011-06-01 14:37               ` Paul E. McKenney
2011-06-01 16:58                 ` Peter Zijlstra
2011-06-01 18:19                   ` Paul E. McKenney
2011-05-31 12:30   ` [tip:core/urgent] rcu: Cure load woes tip-bot for Peter Zijlstra
2011-05-30 11:50 ` Very high CPU load when idle with 3.0-rc1 Damien Wyart
2011-05-30 12:22 ` Morten P.D. Stevens

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=1306755291.1200.2872.camel@twins \
    --to=peterz@infradead.org \
    --cc=damien.wyart@free.fr \
    --cc=efault@gmx.de \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mingo@elte.hu \
    --cc=paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox