Re: [RFC][PATCH] Randomize kernel base address on boot

[Dan Rosenberg <drosenberg@vsecurity.com>]

On Tue, 2011-05-31 at 21:55 +0200, Ingo Molnar wrote:
> * Dan Rosenberg <drosenberg@vsecurity.com> wrote:
> 
> > Just for the record, I've put this patch on hold until there's some 
> > more consensus about whether boot-time randomization of the 
> > physical kernel address is the best approach. [...]
> 
> Well, if you use the suggestion i made: to skip the e820 map fiddling 
> altogether and just allocate half a megabyte of 'hole' at the end of 
> the kernel image - which would allow the kernel to be randomized 
> freely upwards by 0-128 pages - then the 'dynamic' versus 'static' 
> solution could be used at once!
> 
> The 'static' method would use the same hole, just at install time, 
> while the 'dynamic' method would use it during bootup.
> 
> Also, if this method is used then most of the controversy about the 
> dynamic approach goes away (which was the memory maps interpretation 
> fragility).
> 
> Your last patch would need only minor modifications to get the hole 
> added: you'd need to add the tail-hole in the linker map:
> 
>    arch/x86/kernel/vmlinux.lds.S
> 
> So ... could you *please* not shelf this idea just because people 
> used lkml for what it was invented: argued with each other rather 
> forcefully? :-)
> 

Don't worry, I haven't shelved the idea...I just wanted to see more of
the on-going conversation before investing a substantial amount of time
on a potentially infeasible solution.  I'll give this approach a shot.

-Dan

> Thanks,
> 
> 	Ingo