Re: [git pull] x86 fixes

Andrew Morton
2008-05-07T20:10:39Z

On Wed, 7 May 2008 15:48:18 -0400
Andres Salomon <dilinger@queued.net> wrote:

> On Wed, 7 May 2008 21:08:40 +0200 (CEST)
> Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de> wrote:
>
> > On Wed, 7 May 2008, Andres Salomon wrote:
> > > > Sorry, this should not have gone mainline. We had your patch
> > > > queued (via Andrew) and it had testing failures, which we sent to
> > > > you. One workaround was that build patch. When we dropped your
> > > > patch we forgot to remove the workaround as well.
> > > >
> > >
> > > Will it be removed, then? I haven't seen any explanation of its
> > > benefits, and Adrian's point about not catching build failures in
> > > olpc_battery is valid.
> >
> > Yes, it's scheduled for the next pull request. What's the state of the
> > build failures of your original patch ?
> >
> > Thanks,
> > tglx
>
>
> They're queued up in Andrew's tree, I believe. You were also CC'd;
> Message-ID: <20080504104756.3d7b6842@ephemeral>. It wasn't CC'd to
> lkml, unfortunately.

These?

x86-geode-cache-results-from-geode_has_vsa2-and-uninline.patch
x86-geode-define-geode_has_vsa2-even-if-config_mgeode_lx-is-not-set.patch

I have them queued up as for-git-x86. I'll send them over..