public inbox for linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@kernel.crashing.org>
To: Alan Cox <alan@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk>
Cc: "linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: tty vs workqueue oddities
Date: Thu, 02 Jun 2011 17:17:25 +1000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <1306999045.29297.55.camel@pasglop> (raw)

Hi Alan !

Current upstream (but that's been around for at least 2 or 3 days) seems
to have a strange behaviour on one of my powerbooks. Something like
"dmesg" or "cat" of a large file in an X terminal "hangs" the machine
litterally for minutes. It generally recovers, so not always.

Network is unresponsive as well.

My attempts at stopping it into xmon always landed in process_one_work()
or flush_to_ldisc() from what I can tell, and a simple ftrace run shows
something that looks like an -enormous- lot of:

     kworker/0:1-258   [000]   412.105871: flush_to_ldisc <-process_one_work
     kworker/0:1-258   [000]   412.105871: tty_ldisc_ref <-flush_to_ldisc
     kworker/0:1-258   [000]   412.105872: n_tty_receive_buf <-flush_to_ldisc
     kworker/0:1-258   [000]   412.105872: kill_fasync <-n_tty_receive_buf
     kworker/0:1-258   [000]   412.105873: __wake_up <-n_tty_receive_buf
     kworker/0:1-258   [000]   412.105873: __wake_up_common <-__wake_up
     kworker/0:1-258   [000]   412.105874: default_wake_function <-__wake_up_common
     kworker/0:1-258   [000]   412.105874: try_to_wake_up <-default_wake_function
     kworker/0:1-258   [000]   412.105874: tty_throttle <-n_tty_receive_buf
     kworker/0:1-258   [000]   412.105875: mutex_lock <-tty_throttle
     kworker/0:1-258   [000]   412.105875: mutex_unlock <-tty_throttle
     kworker/0:1-258   [000]   412.105876: schedule_work <-flush_to_ldisc
     kworker/0:1-258   [000]   412.105876: queue_work <-schedule_work
     kworker/0:1-258   [000]   412.105877: queue_work_on <-queue_work
     kworker/0:1-258   [000]   412.105877: __queue_work <-queue_work_on
     kworker/0:1-258   [000]   412.105878: insert_work <-__queue_work
     kworker/0:1-258   [000]   412.105878: tty_ldisc_deref <-flush_to_ldisc
     kworker/0:1-258   [000]   412.105879: put_ldisc <-tty_ldisc_deref
     kworker/0:1-258   [000]   412.105879: __wake_up <-put_ldisc
     kworker/0:1-258   [000]   412.105880: __wake_up_common <-__wake_up
     kworker/0:1-258   [000]   412.105880: cwq_dec_nr_in_flight <-process_one_work
     kworker/0:1-258   [000]   412.105880: process_one_work <-worker_thread

   and repeat that sequence more/less identical ad nauseum

Sometimes it breaks out and makes progress, usually after a few mn.

2.6.39 is fine. I'm going to attempt a bisection but it's a bit slow on
those machines and I'm running out of time today, so I wanted to shoot
that to you in case it rings a bell.

Cheers,
Ben.



             reply	other threads:[~2011-06-02  7:19 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 16+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2011-06-02  7:17 Benjamin Herrenschmidt [this message]
2011-06-02  8:37 ` tty breakage in X (Was: tty vs workqueue oddities) Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2011-06-02  9:30   ` Andreas Schwab
2011-06-02 10:07   ` Alan Cox
2011-06-03  0:56     ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2011-06-03  6:17       ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2011-06-03  6:56         ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2011-06-03  9:36           ` Linus Torvalds
2011-06-05 14:37             ` Guillaume Chazarain
2011-06-06 14:24               ` Guillaume Chazarain
2011-06-08  2:44                 ` Linus Torvalds
2011-06-08  3:31                   ` Linus Torvalds
2011-06-08  8:31                     ` Guillaume Chazarain
2011-06-08  8:28                   ` Felipe Balbi
2011-06-08  9:04                   ` Alan Cox
2011-06-02 10:03 ` tty vs workqueue oddities Alan Cox

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=1306999045.29297.55.camel@pasglop \
    --to=benh@kernel.crashing.org \
    --cc=alan@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox