public inbox for linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl>
To: Mike Galbraith <mgalbraith@suse.de>
Cc: LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	Nikhil Rao <ncrao@google.com>, Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
Subject: Re: [patch] sched, cgroups: fix MIN_SHARES on 64 bit boxen
Date: Sat, 04 Jun 2011 13:24:49 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <1307186689.2353.4648.camel@twins> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1307179796.25172.3.camel@marge.simson.net>

On Sat, 2011-06-04 at 11:29 +0200, Mike Galbraith wrote:
> c8b28116 claimed to have no user-visible effect, but allows setting cpu.shares
> to < MIN_SHARES, which the user then indeed sees.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Mike Galbraith <efault@gmx.de>
> ---
>  kernel/sched.c |    2 +-
>  1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
> 
> Index: linux-2.6/kernel/sched.c
> ===================================================================
> --- linux-2.6.orig/kernel/sched.c
> +++ linux-2.6/kernel/sched.c
> @@ -292,7 +292,7 @@ static DEFINE_SPINLOCK(task_group_lock);
>   * (The default weight is 1024 - so there's no practical
>   *  limitation from this.)
>   */
> -#define MIN_SHARES	2
> +#define MIN_SHARES	(scale_load(2))
>  #define MAX_SHARES	(1UL << (18 + SCHED_LOAD_RESOLUTION))
>  
>  static int root_task_group_load = ROOT_TASK_GROUP_LOAD;

Hurm, but that destroys most of the gains from that patch, the whole
point was being able to have finer graunlarities, but now
calc_cfs_shares() and effective_load() are clipped the coarse
granularity.

So maybe explicitly change the MIN_SHARES usage in
sched_group_set_shares(). That wants to become a clamp user anyway,
something like:

shares = clamp(shares, scale_load(MIN_SHARES), scale_load(MAX_SHARES));

That way MAX_SHARES can also loose its SCHED_LOAD_RESOLUTION factor and
bring is back in line with MIN_SHARES.

  reply	other threads:[~2011-06-04 11:25 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2011-06-04  9:29 [patch] sched, cgroups: fix MIN_SHARES on 64 bit boxen Mike Galbraith
2011-06-04 11:24 ` Peter Zijlstra [this message]
2011-06-04 13:03   ` Mike Galbraith
2011-07-01 15:15     ` [tip:sched/urgent] sched, cgroups: Fix MIN_SHARES on 64-bit boxen tip-bot for Mike Galbraith

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=1307186689.2353.4648.camel@twins \
    --to=a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mgalbraith@suse.de \
    --cc=mingo@elte.hu \
    --cc=ncrao@google.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox