public inbox for linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
To: Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@gmail.com>
Cc: David Oliver <david@rgmadvisors.com>,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	Shawn Bohrer <sbohrer@rgmadvisors.com>,
	Zachary Vonler <zvonler@rgmadvisors.com>,
	KOSAKI Motohiro <kosaki.motohiro@jp.fujitsu.com>,
	Hugh Dickins <hughd@google.com>,
	Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
	Darren Hart <dvhart@linux.intel.com>, Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
Subject: Re: Change in functionality of futex() system call.
Date: Mon, 06 Jun 2011 18:11:12 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <1307376672.2322.167.camel@twins> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1307373819.3098.40.camel@edumazet-laptop>

On Mon, 2011-06-06 at 17:23 +0200, Eric Dumazet wrote:
> Le lundi 06 juin 2011 à 09:28 -0500, David Oliver a écrit :
> > Hello,
> > 
> > The functionality of the futex() system call appears to have changed
> > between versions 2.6.18 and 2.6.32.28.
> > 
> > Specifically, performing a FUTEX_WAIT on a read-only mapped location
> > results in an EFAULT. Although other operations, such as FUTEX_WAKE,
> > are only meaningful for writable locations, FUTEX_WAIT is useful for
> > processes with read-only access to a memory-mapped file.
> > 
> > The code below illustrates the changed behavior (each of the EXPECT
> > operations succeed on the older kernel, the ASSERTs pass in each
> > case), assuming the file /tmp/futex_test exists and contains int(42).
> > 
> > With the older kernel, the syscall() suspends until another process
> > changes the file and issues a FUTEX_WAKE, whereas the new behavior is
> > for an EFAULT error, independent of the file contents.
> > 
> > Let me know if you need further clarification.
> > 
> > Cheers!
> > 
> > David Oliver.
> > 
> > 
> > #include <errno.h>
> > #include <fcntl.h>
> > #include <stdint.h>
> > typedef uint32_t u32;   // for futex.h
> > #include <linux/futex.h>
> > #include <sys/mman.h>
> > #include <sys/syscall.h>
> > #include <unistd.h>
> > #include "gtest/gtest.h" // test framework to illustrate issue.
> > 
> > 
> > TEST(Futex, futex_in_read_only_file_is_ok) {
> >   int fd = open("/tmp/futex_test", O_RDONLY);
> >   ASSERT_GE(fd, 0);
> >   int* futex = static_cast<int *>(mmap(0, sizeof(int), PROT_READ,
> > MAP_SHARED, fd, 0));
> >   ASSERT_NE((int *)(0), futex);
> > 
> >   int rc = syscall(SYS_futex, futex, FUTEX_WAIT, 42, 0, 0, 0);
> > 
> >   EXPECT_NE(-1, rc);              // fails.
> >   if (rc == -1) {
> >       EXPECT_NE(errno, EFAULT);   // fails.
> >   }
> > }
> > 
> 
> Right you are, this came from commit 7485d0d3758e8e6491a5 (futexes:
> Remove rw parameter from get_futex_key()) in 2.6.33
> 
> commit 7485d0d3758e8e6491a5c9468114e74dc050785d
> Author: KOSAKI Motohiro <kosaki.motohiro@jp.fujitsu.com>
> Date:   Tue Jan 5 16:32:43 2010 +0900
> 
>     futexes: Remove rw parameter from get_futex_key()
>     
>     Currently, futexes have two problem:
>     
>     A) The current futex code doesn't handle private file mappings properly.
>     
>     get_futex_key() uses PageAnon() to distinguish file and
>     anon, which can cause the following bad scenario:
>     
>       1) thread-A call futex(private-mapping, FUTEX_WAIT), it
>          sleeps on file mapping object.
>       2) thread-B writes a variable and it makes it cow.
>       3) thread-B calls futex(private-mapping, FUTEX_WAKE), it
>          wakes up blocked thread on the anonymous page. (but it's nothing)
>     
>     B) Current futex code doesn't handle zero page properly.
> 
>     Read mode get_user_pages() can return zero page, but current
>     futex code doesn't handle it at all. Then, zero page makes
>     infinite loop internally.
>     
>     The solution is to use write mode get_user_page() always for
>     page lookup. It prevents the lookup of both file page of private
>     mappings and zero page.
>     
>     Performance concerns:
>     
>     Probaly very little, because glibc always initialize variables
>     for futex before to call futex(). It means glibc users never see
>     the overhead of this patch.
>     
>     Compatibility concerns:
>     
>     This patch has few compatibility issues. After this patch,
>     FUTEX_WAIT require writable access to futex variables (read-only
>     mappings makes EFAULT). But practically it's not a problem,
>     glibc always initalizes variables for futexes explicitly - nobody
>     uses read-only mappings.

Urgh,. maybe something like the below but with more conditionals that
enable the extra logic only for FUTEX_WAIT..

The idea is to try a RO gup() when the RW gup() fails so as not to slow
down the common path of writable anonymous maps and bail when we used
the RO path on anonymous memory.

---
diff --git a/kernel/futex.c b/kernel/futex.c
index fe28dc2..11f2ad1 100644
--- a/kernel/futex.c
+++ b/kernel/futex.c
@@ -234,7 +234,7 @@ get_futex_key(u32 __user *uaddr, int fshared, union futex_key *key)
 	unsigned long address = (unsigned long)uaddr;
 	struct mm_struct *mm = current->mm;
 	struct page *page, *page_head;
-	int err;
+	int err, ro = 0;
 
 	/*
 	 * The futex address must be "naturally" aligned.
@@ -262,6 +262,10 @@ get_futex_key(u32 __user *uaddr, int fshared, union futex_key *key)
 
 again:
 	err = get_user_pages_fast(address, 1, 1, &page);
+	if (err == -EFAULT) {
+		err = get_user_pages_fast(address, 1, 0, &page);
+		ro = 1;
+	}
 	if (err < 0)
 		return err;
 
@@ -316,6 +320,11 @@ again:
 	 * the object not the particular process.
 	 */
 	if (PageAnon(page_head)) {
+		if (ro) {
+			err = -EFAULT;
+			goto out;
+		}
+
 		key->both.offset |= FUT_OFF_MMSHARED; /* ref taken on mm */
 		key->private.mm = mm;
 		key->private.address = address;
@@ -327,9 +336,10 @@ again:
 
 	get_futex_key_refs(key);
 
+out:
 	unlock_page(page_head);
 	put_page(page_head);
-	return 0;
+	return err;
 }
 
 static inline void put_futex_key(union futex_key *key)


  parent reply	other threads:[~2011-06-06 16:11 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 99+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2011-06-06 14:28 Change in functionality of futex() system call David Oliver
2011-06-06 15:23 ` Eric Dumazet
2011-06-06 15:56   ` Shawn Bohrer
2011-06-06 16:11   ` Peter Zijlstra [this message]
2011-06-06 16:16     ` Peter Zijlstra
2011-06-06 16:22       ` Eric Dumazet
2011-06-06 16:29         ` Peter Zijlstra
2011-06-06 16:42           ` Eric Dumazet
2011-06-06 17:05             ` Peter Zijlstra
2011-06-06 17:11               ` Eric Dumazet
2011-06-06 17:27                 ` Steven Rostedt
2011-06-06 17:56                   ` Darren Hart
2011-06-06 18:23                 ` Peter Zijlstra
2011-06-06 18:27                   ` Eric Dumazet
2011-06-25  0:00                     ` Darren Hart
2011-06-27 16:48                     ` Shawn Bohrer
2011-06-06 17:53             ` Darren Hart
2011-06-06 18:11               ` Eric Dumazet
2011-06-07  3:13                 ` Darren Hart
2011-06-07  3:49                   ` Eric Dumazet
2011-06-07 14:44                   ` Andy Lutomirski
2011-06-07 15:56                     ` Darren Hart
2011-06-07 15:58                     ` Eric Dumazet
2011-06-07 18:43                       ` Andrew Lutomirski
2011-06-07 19:01                         ` Darren Hart
2011-06-07 19:04                           ` Andrew Lutomirski
2011-06-07 19:06                         ` Eric Dumazet
2011-06-07 19:10                         ` David Oliver
2011-06-07 19:19                           ` Andrew Lutomirski
2011-06-07 19:33                             ` David Oliver
2011-06-07 19:53                               ` Andrew Lutomirski
2011-06-07 20:04                                 ` David Oliver
2011-06-07 20:12                                   ` Andrew Lutomirski
2011-06-07 22:26                             ` Kyle Moffett
2011-06-08 15:20                               ` David Oliver
2011-06-08 15:21                                 ` Andrew Lutomirski
2011-06-08 16:21                                 ` Darren Hart
2011-06-09 11:37                                   ` KOSAKI Motohiro
2011-06-09 12:05                                     ` Peter Zijlstra
2011-06-09 17:58                                       ` Peter Zijlstra
2011-06-10  3:30                                         ` KOSAKI Motohiro
2011-06-10  3:26                                       ` KOSAKI Motohiro
2011-06-07 18:30                 ` Joel Becker
2011-06-09 12:05                 ` Peter Zijlstra
2011-06-10 12:10       ` KOSAKI Motohiro
2011-06-10 17:29         ` Darren Hart
2011-06-13  2:11           ` KOSAKI Motohiro
2011-06-13 15:50             ` Darren Hart
2011-06-15 18:50         ` Shawn Bohrer
2011-06-15 18:54           ` Darren Hart
2011-06-17 13:40             ` Shawn Bohrer
2011-06-22 19:19             ` [PATCH RFC] futex: Fix regression with read only mappings Shawn Bohrer
2011-06-22 20:14               ` Darren Hart
2011-06-23  2:51                 ` KOSAKI Motohiro
2011-06-23 15:26                   ` Darren Hart
2011-06-23 19:49                     ` Shawn Bohrer
2011-06-24 15:59                       ` [PATCH v2] " Shawn Bohrer
2011-06-25  0:37                         ` Darren Hart
2011-06-25 15:10                           ` KOSAKI Motohiro
2011-06-27 16:40                           ` Shawn Bohrer
2011-06-27 18:15                             ` Peter Zijlstra
2011-06-27 20:41                               ` Darren Hart
2011-06-27 21:08                                 ` Shawn Bohrer
2011-06-27 21:39                                   ` Darren Hart
2011-06-27 22:14                                     ` Shawn Bohrer
2011-06-27 23:17                                       ` Darren Hart
2011-06-27 22:22                                     ` [PATCH v3] " Shawn Bohrer
2011-06-28 10:54                                       ` Peter Zijlstra
2011-06-28 14:52                                         ` Darren Hart
2011-06-28 17:38                                           ` Shawn Bohrer
2011-06-28 20:58                                             ` Darren Hart
2011-06-28 23:55                                             ` Darren Hart
2011-06-29 14:56                                               ` Shawn Bohrer
2011-06-29 15:17                                               ` [PATCH v4] " Shawn Bohrer
2011-06-29 18:41                                                 ` Darren Hart
2011-06-29 23:38                                                 ` Thomas Gleixner
2011-06-30  4:19                                                   ` Darren Hart
2011-06-30 14:02                                                     ` David C. Oliver
2011-06-30 15:41                                                       ` Darren Hart
2011-06-30 16:21                                                         ` [PATCH v5] " Shawn Bohrer
2011-07-12 15:27                                                           ` Shawn Bohrer
2011-07-25 15:20                                                           ` Shawn Bohrer
2011-07-25 19:28                                                             ` Thomas Gleixner
2011-07-26 19:04                                                           ` [tip:core/urgent] " tip-bot for Shawn Bohrer
2011-06-28 10:50                                     ` [PATCH v2] " Peter Zijlstra
2011-06-28 14:19                                       ` Darren Hart
2011-06-28 14:23                                         ` Peter Zijlstra
2011-06-23  3:58                 ` [PATCH RFC] " Shawn Bohrer
2011-06-23  3:23             ` Change in functionality of futex() system call KOSAKI Motohiro
  -- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2011-06-09  0:44 George Spelvin
2011-06-09  3:02 ` Darren Hart
2011-06-09  3:38   ` Andrew Lutomirski
2011-06-09  3:54     ` Eric Dumazet
2011-06-09  4:10       ` Andrew Lutomirski
2011-06-09  5:11         ` Eric Dumazet
2011-06-09 12:12           ` Andrew Lutomirski
2011-06-09  4:43       ` George Spelvin
2011-06-09  5:25         ` Eric Dumazet
2011-06-09  4:44       ` Kyle Moffett

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=1307376672.2322.167.camel@twins \
    --to=peterz@infradead.org \
    --cc=david@rgmadvisors.com \
    --cc=dvhart@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=eric.dumazet@gmail.com \
    --cc=hughd@google.com \
    --cc=kosaki.motohiro@jp.fujitsu.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mingo@elte.hu \
    --cc=sbohrer@rgmadvisors.com \
    --cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
    --cc=zvonler@rgmadvisors.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox