From: Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>
To: x86@kernel.org, mingo@elte.hu, akpm@linux-foundation.org,
torvalds@linux-foundation.org, suresh.b.siddha@intel.com,
a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Cc: Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>
Subject: [PATCH 2/3] stop_machine: reorganize stop_cpus() implementation
Date: Tue, 14 Jun 2011 19:06:57 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1308071218-5912-3-git-send-email-tj@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1308071218-5912-1-git-send-email-tj@kernel.org>
Split __stop_cpus() into stop_cpus_queue() and stop_cpus_locked().
The former handles only the queueing part. The latter uses the queue
function and is functionally equivalent to __stop_cpus().
The reorganization is to help future improvements to stop_machine()
and doesn't introduce any behavior difference.
Signed-off-by: Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>
Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
Cc: Suresh Siddha <suresh.b.siddha@intel.com>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl>
---
kernel/stop_machine.c | 20 ++++++++++++++------
1 files changed, 14 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
diff --git a/kernel/stop_machine.c b/kernel/stop_machine.c
index 3d3f47d..198973f 100644
--- a/kernel/stop_machine.c
+++ b/kernel/stop_machine.c
@@ -136,10 +136,11 @@ void stop_one_cpu_nowait(unsigned int cpu, cpu_stop_fn_t fn, void *arg,
static DEFINE_MUTEX(stop_cpus_mutex);
static DEFINE_PER_CPU(struct cpu_stop_work, stop_cpus_work);
-int __stop_cpus(const struct cpumask *cpumask, cpu_stop_fn_t fn, void *arg)
+static void stop_cpus_queue(const struct cpumask *cpumask,
+ cpu_stop_fn_t fn, void *arg,
+ struct cpu_stop_done *done)
{
struct cpu_stop_work *work;
- struct cpu_stop_done done;
unsigned int cpu;
/* initialize works and done */
@@ -147,9 +148,8 @@ int __stop_cpus(const struct cpumask *cpumask, cpu_stop_fn_t fn, void *arg)
work = &per_cpu(stop_cpus_work, cpu);
work->fn = fn;
work->arg = arg;
- work->done = &done;
+ work->done = done;
}
- cpu_stop_init_done(&done, cpumask_weight(cpumask));
/*
* Disable preemption while queueing to avoid getting
@@ -161,7 +161,15 @@ int __stop_cpus(const struct cpumask *cpumask, cpu_stop_fn_t fn, void *arg)
cpu_stop_queue_work(&per_cpu(cpu_stopper, cpu),
&per_cpu(stop_cpus_work, cpu));
preempt_enable();
+}
+static int stop_cpus_locked(const struct cpumask *cpumask,
+ cpu_stop_fn_t fn, void *arg)
+{
+ struct cpu_stop_done done;
+
+ cpu_stop_init_done(&done, cpumask_weight(cpumask));
+ stop_cpus_queue(cpumask, fn, arg, &done);
wait_for_completion(&done.completion);
return done.executed ? done.ret : -ENOENT;
}
@@ -200,7 +208,7 @@ int stop_cpus(const struct cpumask *cpumask, cpu_stop_fn_t fn, void *arg)
/* static works are used, process one request at a time */
mutex_lock(&stop_cpus_mutex);
- ret = __stop_cpus(cpumask, fn, arg);
+ ret = stop_cpus_locked(cpumask, fn, arg);
mutex_unlock(&stop_cpus_mutex);
return ret;
}
@@ -230,7 +238,7 @@ int try_stop_cpus(const struct cpumask *cpumask, cpu_stop_fn_t fn, void *arg)
/* static works are used, process one request at a time */
if (!mutex_trylock(&stop_cpus_mutex))
return -EAGAIN;
- ret = __stop_cpus(cpumask, fn, arg);
+ ret = stop_cpus_locked(cpumask, fn, arg);
mutex_unlock(&stop_cpus_mutex);
return ret;
}
--
1.7.5.2
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2011-06-14 17:07 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 16+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2011-06-14 17:06 [PATCHSET] stop_machine: implement stop_machine_from_offline_cpu() Tejun Heo
2011-06-14 17:06 ` [PATCH 1/3] stop_machine: kill __stop_machine() Tejun Heo
2011-06-16 12:12 ` Peter Zijlstra
2011-06-16 12:44 ` Tejun Heo
2011-06-16 17:37 ` Suresh Siddha
2011-06-16 17:55 ` Peter Zijlstra
2011-06-16 18:17 ` Suresh Siddha
2011-06-16 18:28 ` Tejun Heo
2011-06-16 18:36 ` Peter Zijlstra
2011-06-16 18:44 ` Suresh Siddha
2011-06-16 18:28 ` Peter Zijlstra
2011-06-14 17:06 ` Tejun Heo [this message]
2011-06-14 17:06 ` [PATCH 3/3] stop_machine: implement stop_machine_from_offline_cpu() Tejun Heo
2011-06-16 12:10 ` [PATCHSET] " Peter Zijlstra
2011-06-16 12:15 ` Tejun Heo
2011-06-16 17:21 ` Suresh Siddha
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1308071218-5912-3-git-send-email-tj@kernel.org \
--to=tj@kernel.org \
--cc=a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@elte.hu \
--cc=suresh.b.siddha@intel.com \
--cc=torvalds@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=x86@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox