From: Mike Galbraith <efault@gmx.de>
To: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>,
Yong Zhang <yong.zhang0@gmail.com>,
Hillf Danton <dhillf@gmail.com>, Mike Galbraith <efault@gmx.de>
Subject: Re: [RFC][PATCH 4/7] sched, rt: Fix rq->rt.pushable_tasks bug in push_rt_task()
Date: Fri, 17 Jun 2011 04:33:25 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1308278005.15063.12.camel@marge.simson.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20110617015919.136959032@goodmis.org>
On Thu, 2011-06-16 at 21:55 -0400, Steven Rostedt wrote:
> plain text document attachment
> (0004-sched-rt-Fix-rq-rt.pushable_tasks-bug-in-push_rt_tas.patch)
> From: Hillf Danton <dhillf@gmail.com>
>
> Do not call dequeue_pushable_task() when failing to push an eligible
> task, as it remains pushable, merely not at this particular moment.
>
> Cc: Yong Zhang <yong.zhang0@gmail.com>
> Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
> Signed-off-by: Hillf Danton <dhillf@gmail.com>
> Signed-off-by: Mike Galbraith <mgalbraith@gmx.de>
Mixing addresses doesn't work. Less bouncy SOB.
Signed-off-by: Mike Galbraith <efault@gmx.de>
> Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/1306895385.4791.26.camel@marge.simson.net
> Signed-off-by: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org>
> ---
> kernel/sched_rt.c | 15 ++++++++-------
> 1 files changed, 8 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/kernel/sched_rt.c b/kernel/sched_rt.c
> index a6f1f64..7737d41 100644
> --- a/kernel/sched_rt.c
> +++ b/kernel/sched_rt.c
> @@ -1378,6 +1378,7 @@ static int push_rt_task(struct rq *rq)
> {
> struct task_struct *next_task;
> struct rq *lowest_rq;
> + int ret = 0;
>
> if (!rq->rt.overloaded)
> return 0;
> @@ -1410,7 +1411,7 @@ retry:
> if (!lowest_rq) {
> struct task_struct *task;
> /*
> - * find lock_lowest_rq releases rq->lock
> + * find_lock_lowest_rq releases rq->lock
> * so it is possible that next_task has migrated.
> *
> * We need to make sure that the task is still on the same
> @@ -1420,12 +1421,11 @@ retry:
> task = pick_next_pushable_task(rq);
> if (task_cpu(next_task) == rq->cpu && task == next_task) {
> /*
> - * If we get here, the task hasn't moved at all, but
> - * it has failed to push. We will not try again,
> - * since the other cpus will pull from us when they
> - * are ready.
> + * The task hasn't migrated, and is still the next
> + * eligible task, but we failed to find a run-queue
> + * to push it to. Do not retry in this case, since
> + * other cpus will pull from us when ready.
> */
> - dequeue_pushable_task(rq, next_task);
> goto out;
> }
>
> @@ -1444,6 +1444,7 @@ retry:
> deactivate_task(rq, next_task, 0);
> set_task_cpu(next_task, lowest_rq->cpu);
> activate_task(lowest_rq, next_task, 0);
> + ret = 1;
>
> resched_task(lowest_rq->curr);
>
> @@ -1452,7 +1453,7 @@ retry:
> out:
> put_task_struct(next_task);
>
> - return 1;
> + return ret;
> }
>
> static void push_rt_tasks(struct rq *rq)
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2011-06-17 2:33 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 16+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2011-06-17 1:55 [RFC][PATCH 0/7] sched: various updates to the scheduler Steven Rostedt
2011-06-17 1:55 ` [RFC][PATCH 1/7] sched: Fix need_resched() when checking peempt Steven Rostedt
2011-06-17 1:55 ` [RFC][PATCH 2/7] sched: Remove noop in next_prio() Steven Rostedt
2011-06-17 1:55 ` [RFC][PATCH 3/7] sched: Remove noop in lowest_flag_domain() Steven Rostedt
2011-06-17 1:55 ` [RFC][PATCH 4/7] sched, rt: Fix rq->rt.pushable_tasks bug in push_rt_task() Steven Rostedt
2011-06-17 2:33 ` Mike Galbraith [this message]
2011-06-17 2:41 ` Steven Rostedt
2011-06-17 1:55 ` [RFC][PATCH 5/7] sched: Remove resetting exec_start in put_prev_task_rt() Steven Rostedt
2011-06-17 1:55 ` [RFC][PATCH 6/7] sched: Balance RT tasks when forked as well Steven Rostedt
2011-07-26 12:25 ` Peter Zijlstra
2011-07-26 12:35 ` Steven Rostedt
2011-07-26 12:36 ` Peter Zijlstra
2011-07-26 12:50 ` Steven Rostedt
2011-08-14 16:05 ` [tip:sched/core] " tip-bot for Steven Rostedt
2011-06-17 1:55 ` [RFC][PATCH 7/7] sched: Use pushable_tasks to determine next highest prio Steven Rostedt
2011-06-17 2:40 ` [RFC][PATCH 0/7] sched: various updates to the scheduler Steven Rostedt
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1308278005.15063.12.camel@marge.simson.net \
--to=efault@gmx.de \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=dhillf@gmail.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@elte.hu \
--cc=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=rostedt@goodmis.org \
--cc=yong.zhang0@gmail.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox