public inbox for linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Mike Galbraith <efault@gmx.de>
To: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>,
	Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
	Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>,
	Yong Zhang <yong.zhang0@gmail.com>,
	Hillf Danton <dhillf@gmail.com>, Mike Galbraith <efault@gmx.de>
Subject: Re: [RFC][PATCH 4/7] sched, rt: Fix rq->rt.pushable_tasks bug in push_rt_task()
Date: Fri, 17 Jun 2011 04:33:25 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <1308278005.15063.12.camel@marge.simson.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20110617015919.136959032@goodmis.org>

On Thu, 2011-06-16 at 21:55 -0400, Steven Rostedt wrote:
> plain text document attachment
> (0004-sched-rt-Fix-rq-rt.pushable_tasks-bug-in-push_rt_tas.patch)
> From: Hillf Danton <dhillf@gmail.com>
> 
> Do not call dequeue_pushable_task() when failing to push an eligible
> task, as it remains pushable, merely not at this particular moment.
> 
> Cc: Yong Zhang <yong.zhang0@gmail.com>
> Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
> Signed-off-by: Hillf Danton <dhillf@gmail.com>
> Signed-off-by: Mike Galbraith <mgalbraith@gmx.de>

Mixing addresses doesn't work.  Less bouncy SOB.

Signed-off-by: Mike Galbraith <efault@gmx.de>


> Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/1306895385.4791.26.camel@marge.simson.net
> Signed-off-by: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org>
> ---
>  kernel/sched_rt.c |   15 ++++++++-------
>  1 files changed, 8 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/kernel/sched_rt.c b/kernel/sched_rt.c
> index a6f1f64..7737d41 100644
> --- a/kernel/sched_rt.c
> +++ b/kernel/sched_rt.c
> @@ -1378,6 +1378,7 @@ static int push_rt_task(struct rq *rq)
>  {
>  	struct task_struct *next_task;
>  	struct rq *lowest_rq;
> +	int ret = 0;
>  
>  	if (!rq->rt.overloaded)
>  		return 0;
> @@ -1410,7 +1411,7 @@ retry:
>  	if (!lowest_rq) {
>  		struct task_struct *task;
>  		/*
> -		 * find lock_lowest_rq releases rq->lock
> +		 * find_lock_lowest_rq releases rq->lock
>  		 * so it is possible that next_task has migrated.
>  		 *
>  		 * We need to make sure that the task is still on the same
> @@ -1420,12 +1421,11 @@ retry:
>  		task = pick_next_pushable_task(rq);
>  		if (task_cpu(next_task) == rq->cpu && task == next_task) {
>  			/*
> -			 * If we get here, the task hasn't moved at all, but
> -			 * it has failed to push.  We will not try again,
> -			 * since the other cpus will pull from us when they
> -			 * are ready.
> +			 * The task hasn't migrated, and is still the next
> +			 * eligible task, but we failed to find a run-queue
> +			 * to push it to.  Do not retry in this case, since
> +			 * other cpus will pull from us when ready.
>  			 */
> -			dequeue_pushable_task(rq, next_task);
>  			goto out;
>  		}
>  
> @@ -1444,6 +1444,7 @@ retry:
>  	deactivate_task(rq, next_task, 0);
>  	set_task_cpu(next_task, lowest_rq->cpu);
>  	activate_task(lowest_rq, next_task, 0);
> +	ret = 1;
>  
>  	resched_task(lowest_rq->curr);
>  
> @@ -1452,7 +1453,7 @@ retry:
>  out:
>  	put_task_struct(next_task);
>  
> -	return 1;
> +	return ret;
>  }
>  
>  static void push_rt_tasks(struct rq *rq)



  reply	other threads:[~2011-06-17  2:33 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 16+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2011-06-17  1:55 [RFC][PATCH 0/7] sched: various updates to the scheduler Steven Rostedt
2011-06-17  1:55 ` [RFC][PATCH 1/7] sched: Fix need_resched() when checking peempt Steven Rostedt
2011-06-17  1:55 ` [RFC][PATCH 2/7] sched: Remove noop in next_prio() Steven Rostedt
2011-06-17  1:55 ` [RFC][PATCH 3/7] sched: Remove noop in lowest_flag_domain() Steven Rostedt
2011-06-17  1:55 ` [RFC][PATCH 4/7] sched, rt: Fix rq->rt.pushable_tasks bug in push_rt_task() Steven Rostedt
2011-06-17  2:33   ` Mike Galbraith [this message]
2011-06-17  2:41     ` Steven Rostedt
2011-06-17  1:55 ` [RFC][PATCH 5/7] sched: Remove resetting exec_start in put_prev_task_rt() Steven Rostedt
2011-06-17  1:55 ` [RFC][PATCH 6/7] sched: Balance RT tasks when forked as well Steven Rostedt
2011-07-26 12:25   ` Peter Zijlstra
2011-07-26 12:35     ` Steven Rostedt
2011-07-26 12:36       ` Peter Zijlstra
2011-07-26 12:50         ` Steven Rostedt
2011-08-14 16:05   ` [tip:sched/core] " tip-bot for Steven Rostedt
2011-06-17  1:55 ` [RFC][PATCH 7/7] sched: Use pushable_tasks to determine next highest prio Steven Rostedt
2011-06-17  2:40 ` [RFC][PATCH 0/7] sched: various updates to the scheduler Steven Rostedt

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=1308278005.15063.12.camel@marge.simson.net \
    --to=efault@gmx.de \
    --cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=dhillf@gmail.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mingo@elte.hu \
    --cc=peterz@infradead.org \
    --cc=rostedt@goodmis.org \
    --cc=yong.zhang0@gmail.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox