From: Artem Bityutskiy <dedekind1@gmail.com>
To: David Wagner <david.wagner@free-electrons.com>
Cc: Matthieu CASTET <matthieu.castet@parrot.com>,
"dwmw2@infradead.org" <dwmw2@infradead.org>,
"linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
"linux-mtd@lists.infradead.org" <linux-mtd@lists.infradead.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] UBI: new module ubiblk: block layer on top of UBI
Date: Wed, 29 Jun 2011 09:25:47 +0300 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1309328751.23597.109.camel@sauron> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <4E09F3F1.7080109@free-electrons.com>
On Tue, 2011-06-28 at 17:32 +0200, David Wagner wrote:
> On 06/28/2011 04:50 PM, Matthieu CASTET wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> [...]
> > Also what are the advantage against gluebi + mtdblock_ro ?
>
> The main advantage is a reduced number of layers ; I must say I cannot
> see much more for now. I could add that the Kconfig help of gluebi
> advises not to use it except when needed by legacy software.
Well, I think Matthieu has a valid poit, you should try to come up with
a set of advantages, otherwise why would this drivers be needed? Why
would people spend time reviewing it? May be less memcpy's? Do we do an
extra memcpy in gluebi? If yes, can we avoid doing this. Anyway, please,
try to sell this driver a bit better.
--
Best Regards,
Artem Bityutskiy
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2011-06-29 6:25 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 53+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2011-06-24 13:34 [RFC] ubiblk: read-only block layer on top of UBI david.wagner
2011-06-24 13:34 ` [PATCH] UBI: new module ubiblk: " david.wagner
2011-06-27 19:26 ` Artem Bityutskiy
2011-06-28 11:35 ` David Wagner
2011-06-29 6:52 ` Artem Bityutskiy
2011-06-28 14:50 ` Matthieu CASTET
2011-06-28 15:32 ` David Wagner
2011-06-29 6:25 ` Artem Bityutskiy [this message]
2011-06-24 13:45 ` [Addendum][RFC] ubiblk: read-only " David Wagner
2011-06-27 19:14 ` [RFC] " Artem Bityutskiy
2011-06-28 15:24 ` [RFC PATCHv2] UBI: new module ubiblk: " david.wagner
2011-06-29 6:54 ` Artem Bityutskiy
2011-07-26 12:27 ` [PATCH] " David Wagner
2011-07-26 12:34 ` Christoph Hellwig
2011-07-26 12:58 ` David Wagner
2011-07-28 6:14 ` Artem Bityutskiy
2011-08-15 11:56 ` Artem Bityutskiy
2011-08-17 13:17 ` [PATCHv3] " david.wagner
2011-08-17 14:20 ` [PATCH] Tools for controling ubiblk David Wagner
2011-08-22 7:39 ` [PATCHv3] UBI: new module ubiblk: block layer on top of UBI Artem Bityutskiy
2011-08-22 7:42 ` Artem Bityutskiy
2011-08-24 16:23 ` Arnd Bergmann
2011-08-25 7:06 ` Artem Bityutskiy
2011-08-25 15:12 ` Arnd Bergmann
2011-09-01 12:55 ` David Wagner
2011-09-06 3:44 ` Artem Bityutskiy
2011-09-06 4:10 ` Artem Bityutskiy
2011-09-06 4:29 ` Artem Bityutskiy
2011-09-08 15:26 ` Arnd Bergmann
2011-09-09 11:53 ` Artem Bityutskiy
2011-09-09 12:02 ` Artem Bityutskiy
2011-09-09 14:25 ` Arnd Bergmann
2011-09-09 15:27 ` Artem Bityutskiy
2011-09-09 14:41 ` David Wagner
2011-09-09 14:51 ` Arnd Bergmann
2011-09-11 10:18 ` Artem Bityutskiy
2011-09-11 10:35 ` David Wagner
2011-08-24 16:15 ` [PATCHv4] " david.wagner
2011-08-24 16:21 ` [PATCH] document ubiblk's usage of the same ioctl magic as a part " David Wagner
2011-09-06 4:58 ` Artem Bityutskiy
2011-09-06 4:55 ` [PATCHv4] UBI: new module ubiblk: block layer on top " Artem Bityutskiy
2011-09-12 9:51 ` [PATCHv5] " David Wagner
2011-09-19 4:50 ` Artem Bityutskiy
2011-09-22 7:58 ` [PATCHv6] " David Wagner
2011-09-23 10:58 ` Artem Bityutskiy
2011-09-26 12:58 ` David Wagner
2011-09-26 9:17 ` Ricard Wanderlof
2011-09-26 12:38 ` [PATCHv7] " David Wagner
2011-09-26 13:20 ` Artem Bityutskiy
2011-09-26 14:25 ` [PATCHv8] " David Wagner
2011-09-26 14:36 ` Artem Bityutskiy
2011-09-26 14:40 ` [PATCHv9] " David Wagner
2011-10-01 14:08 ` Artem Bityutskiy
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1309328751.23597.109.camel@sauron \
--to=dedekind1@gmail.com \
--cc=david.wagner@free-electrons.com \
--cc=dwmw2@infradead.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mtd@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=matthieu.castet@parrot.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox