From: "Alex,Shi" <alex.shi@intel.com>
To: Nikhil Rao <ncrao@google.com>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>,
"mingo@elte.hu" <mingo@elte.hu>,
"Chen, Tim C" <tim.c.chen@intel.com>,
"Li, Shaohua" <shaohua.li@intel.com>,
"linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
"Brown, Len" <len.brown@intel.com>
Subject: Re: power increase issue on light load
Date: Wed, 29 Jun 2011 14:55:46 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1309330546.14604.97.camel@debian> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1309317764.14604.92.camel@debian>
On Wed, 2011-06-29 at 11:22 +0800, Alex,Shi wrote:
> >
> > Looking at the schedstat data Alex posted:
> > - Distribution of load balances across cores looks about the same.
> > - Load balancer does more idle balances on 3.0-rc4 as compared to
> > 2.6.39 on SMT and NUMA domains. Busy and newidle balances are a mixed
> > bag.
> > - I see far fewer affine wakeups on 3.0-rc4 as compared to 2.6.39.
> > About half as many affine wakeups on SMT and about a quarter as many
> > on NUMA.
> >
> > I'm investigating the impact of the load resolution patchset on
> > effective load and wake affine calculations. This seems to be the most
> > obvious difference from the schedstat data.
> >
> > Alex -- I have a couple of questions about your test setup and results.
> > - What is the impact on throughput of these benchmarks?
>
> both on bltk-office and light load specpower, 10%/20%/30% load, the
> throughput almost have no change on my NHM-EP server and t410 laptop.
> > - Would it be possible to get a "perf sched" trace on these two kernels?
I tried the 'perf sched record' and then 'perf sched trace' as usage
show. but in fact, the 'perf sched' doesn't support 'trace' command now.
since the 'perf sched record' is using 'perf record -e sched:xxx' to do
record. I used 'perf record' directly. The follow info collected in 300'
on my NHM-EP for benchmark bltk-office.
[alexs@lkp-ne01 ~]$ grep -e Events.*sched
linux-2.6/perf-report-3.0.0-rc5
# Events: 11K sched:sched_wakeup
# Events: 1K sched:sched_wakeup_new
# Events: 24K sched:sched_switch
# Events: 3K sched:sched_migrate_task
# Events: 851 sched:sched_process_free
# Events: 1K sched:sched_process_exit
# Events: 1K sched:sched_process_wait
# Events: 1K sched:sched_process_fork
# Events: 12K sched:sched_stat_wait
# Events: 9K sched:sched_stat_sleep
# Events: 452 sched:sched_stat_iowait
# Events: 16K sched:sched_stat_runtime
[alexs@lkp-ne01 ~]$
[alexs@lkp-ne01 ~]$
[alexs@lkp-ne01 ~]$ grep -e
Events.*sched /mnt/linux-2.6.39/perf-report-2.6.39
# Events: 5K sched:sched_wakeup
# Events: 615 sched:sched_wakeup_new
# Events: 11K sched:sched_switch
# Events: 2K sched:sched_migrate_task
# Events: 541 sched:sched_process_free
# Events: 692 sched:sched_process_exit
# Events: 1K sched:sched_process_wait
# Events: 615 sched:sched_process_fork
# Events: 6K sched:sched_stat_wait
# Events: 4K sched:sched_stat_sleep
# Events: 178 sched:sched_stat_iowait
# Events: 9K sched:sched_stat_runtime
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2011-06-29 6:55 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 17+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2011-06-23 2:43 power increase issue on light load Alex,Shi
2011-06-23 9:02 ` Peter Zijlstra
2011-06-24 0:41 ` Alex,Shi
2011-06-28 0:02 ` Alex,Shi
2011-06-28 14:59 ` Peter Zijlstra
2011-06-28 17:13 ` Nikhil Rao
2011-06-29 2:30 ` Nikhil Rao
2011-06-29 3:22 ` Alex,Shi
2011-06-29 6:55 ` Alex,Shi [this message]
2011-06-30 0:26 ` Nikhil Rao
2011-06-30 8:38 ` Alex,Shi
2011-06-30 0:07 ` Nikhil Rao
2011-06-30 8:34 ` Alex,Shi
2011-07-01 5:44 ` Ming Lei
2011-07-01 18:00 ` Nikhil Rao
2011-07-01 23:51 ` Ming Lei
2011-07-04 0:45 ` Alex,Shi
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1309330546.14604.97.camel@debian \
--to=alex.shi@intel.com \
--cc=len.brown@intel.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@elte.hu \
--cc=ncrao@google.com \
--cc=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=shaohua.li@intel.com \
--cc=tim.c.chen@intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox