From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1752404Ab1GOOaJ (ORCPT ); Fri, 15 Jul 2011 10:30:09 -0400 Received: from shadbolt.e.decadent.org.uk ([88.96.1.126]:32868 "EHLO shadbolt.e.decadent.org.uk" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752314Ab1GOOaF (ORCPT ); Fri, 15 Jul 2011 10:30:05 -0400 Subject: megaraid vs i2o for PCI device ID 101e:1960 From: Ben Hutchings To: Neela Syam Kolli Cc: 632187@bugs.debian.org, operator@ins.uni-bonn.de, Vasily Averin , LKML In-Reply-To: <4E1EB3E8.1090503@ins.uni-bonn.de> References: <4E0C5B57.2020104@ins.uni-bonn.de> <4E0D8BAE.1000004@ins.uni-bonn.de> <1310531358.8783.249.camel@localhost> <4E1E989A.2090307@ins.uni-bonn.de> <4E1EB3E8.1090503@ins.uni-bonn.de> Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg="pgp-sha512"; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="=-MrrhC4TuTahaRyxn5r5l" Date: Fri, 15 Jul 2011 15:29:56 +0100 Message-ID: <1310740196.8783.288.camel@localhost> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Evolution 2.32.3 X-SA-Exim-Connect-IP: 2001:470:1f08:1539:21c:bfff:fe03:f805 X-SA-Exim-Mail-From: ben@decadent.org.uk X-SA-Exim-Scanned: No (on shadbolt.decadent.org.uk); SAEximRunCond expanded to false Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org --=-MrrhC4TuTahaRyxn5r5l Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Thu, 2011-07-14 at 11:16 +0200, Alexander Schier wrote: > On 07/14/2011 09:19 AM, Alexander Schier wrote: > > Hi! > > > > On 07/13/2011 06:29 AM, Ben Hutchings wrote: > >> Can you try adding 'blacklist=3Di2o_core' to the kernel parameters, so > >> only the megaraid driver is used? > > We will try this. > Now it works, when i2o_core is blacklisted. Alexander reported in that the kernel took a very long time to boot, and the log showed first i2o_core and then megaraid failing to probe a device (ID 101e:1960). But above he reports that megaraid is able to probe it successfully if i2o_core didn't break it first. Should this device be blacklisted from i2o_core? Are there likely other MegaRAID devices that use the I2O PCI class but don't work with this generic driver? Ben. --=20 Ben Hutchings Absolutum obsoletum. (If it works, it's out of date.) - Stafford Beer --=-MrrhC4TuTahaRyxn5r5l Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" Content-Description: This is a digitally signed message part -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.11 (GNU/Linux) iQIVAwUATiBO3ee/yOyVhhEJAQqc/Q/+O4y0d1FLVpzF1DttJZloUmC5QbUiEY5M ZMrkleQriZfa0n6WuKAfvWO67Uqxf4LqcPYH6R/sb6to162Vbx39/oYaAxv5ZY+c Cz37x0UIHxZ5983XLKFhLwKRaSnJs7v7+8IkitrT9DA6S027Eq56BMbqXyKaxRyD QdXxbAUvmDhNpqr5prrxA5ePF7nIUJsW7zz6T2KITcWEU2lDxxuGvL1P+tr6c+/y sosHfW5AlMvJmsCwx7LobP0+w2hLeqeoKeSj2+TOqZCHRCxgPv9AYL314kCcmPCu OdmChstR5hDJ/i5XLQV6EioH5MrngSobOF6+Of77L6vwh/A7xRB+LiQoWnLa/ozi p6zwYsjeeJZ8bo/k879jEEcKCpJR+lRLyhz3VjVb/MUidC7/M9JHPsnjeRfivE+C RUIr+ORnSU40XIkyZ8wRsrnO8UXmS3whmfH6FBHt1bXLHRTdmFc/tWxn2QzMxBrf ZkS3up2awZSNryhoG1PZDVZthmQhS4fTBfXOf6ERTu8OMoKKweT6UXnOC1K3e7v2 JCWO306StYbUVt2MGGiEa5qr/s+y+ACH3QGa+9UvcCfVXWucm4O0Zv1V78xW8j7r yxx+Y8LXnWi9U+4G3dwWPiNODWDznYZy1eI1VKQQWmjnRdKE2RGilFDELYxnlIUH MoihPhecUtM= =Cz/5 -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --=-MrrhC4TuTahaRyxn5r5l--