From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1752591Ab1G2Q7M (ORCPT ); Fri, 29 Jul 2011 12:59:12 -0400 Received: from merlin.infradead.org ([205.233.59.134]:60983 "EHLO merlin.infradead.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752476Ab1G2Q7L convert rfc822-to-8bit (ORCPT ); Fri, 29 Jul 2011 12:59:11 -0400 Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/7] perf, x86: Implement IBS initialization From: Peter Zijlstra To: Robert Richter Cc: Ingo Molnar , Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo , LKML In-Reply-To: <1311860812-28748-3-git-send-email-robert.richter@amd.com> References: <1311860812-28748-1-git-send-email-robert.richter@amd.com> <1311860812-28748-3-git-send-email-robert.richter@amd.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8BIT Date: Fri, 29 Jul 2011 18:58:45 +0200 Message-ID: <1311958725.5890.410.camel@twins> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Evolution 2.30.3 Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Thu, 2011-07-28 at 15:46 +0200, Robert Richter wrote: > +static int perf_ibs_add(struct perf_event *event, int flags) > +{ > + pr_info("Adding event %p (config=%016llx) to pmu %s (type=%d) on cpu %d\n", > + event, event->attr.config, perf_ibs.name, event->attr.type, event->oncpu); > + return 0; > +} > + > +static void perf_ibs_del(struct perf_event *event, int flags) > +{ > + pr_info("Removing event %p (config=%016llx) to pmu %s (type=%d) on cpu %d\n", > + event, event->attr.config, perf_ibs.name, event->attr.type, event->oncpu); > +} While I see you remove them later on, I do find it somewhat strange to have them here. This is user triggerable code in the context switch path, lots of nasty can come from this.