From: Badari Pulavarty <pbadari@us.ibm.com>
To: Liu Yuan <namei.unix@gmail.com>
Cc: Stefan Hajnoczi <stefanha@gmail.com>,
"Michael S. Tsirkin" <mst@redhat.com>,
Rusty Russell <rusty@rustcorp.com.au>,
Avi Kivity <avi@redhat.com>,
kvm@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
Khoa Huynh <khoa@us.ibm.com>
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH]vhost-blk: In-kernel accelerator for virtio block device
Date: Wed, 10 Aug 2011 13:37:47 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1313008667.9603.14.camel@badari-desktop> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <4E41EAC5.8060001@gmail.com>
On Wed, 2011-08-10 at 10:19 +0800, Liu Yuan wrote:
> On 08/09/2011 01:16 AM, Badari Pulavarty wrote:
> > On 8/8/2011 12:31 AM, Liu Yuan wrote:
> >> On 08/08/2011 01:04 PM, Badari Pulavarty wrote:
> >>> On 8/7/2011 6:35 PM, Liu Yuan wrote:
> >>>> On 08/06/2011 02:02 AM, Badari Pulavarty wrote:
> >>>>> On 8/5/2011 4:04 AM, Liu Yuan wrote:
> >>>>>> On 08/05/2011 05:58 AM, Badari Pulavarty wrote:
> >>>>>>> Hi Liu Yuan,
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>> I started testing your patches. I applied your kernel patch to 3.0
> >>>>>>> and applied QEMU to latest git.
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>> I passed 6 blockdevices from the host to guest (4 vcpu, 4GB RAM).
> >>>>>>> I ran simple "dd" read tests from the guest on all block devices
> >>>>>>> (with various blocksizes, iflag=direct).
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>> Unfortunately, system doesn't stay up. I immediately get into
> >>>>>>> panic on the host. I didn't get time to debug the problem.
> >>>>>>> Wondering
> >>>>>>> if you have seen this issue before and/or you have new patchset
> >>>>>>> to try ?
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>> Let me know.
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>> Thanks,
> >>>>>>> Badari
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> Okay, it is actually a bug pointed out by MST on the other
> >>>>>> thread, that it needs a mutex for completion thread.
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> Now would you please this attachment?This patch only applies to
> >>>>>> kernel part, on top of v1 kernel patch.
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> This patch mainly moves completion thread into vhost thread as a
> >>>>>> function. As a result, both requests submitting and completion
> >>>>>> signalling is in the same thread.
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> Yuan
> >>>>>
> >>>>> Unfortunately, "dd" tests (4 out of 6) in the guest hung. I see
> >>>>> following messages
> >>>>>
> >>>>> virtio_blk virtio2: requests: id 0 is not a head !
> >>>>> virtio_blk virtio3: requests: id 1 is not a head !
> >>>>> virtio_blk virtio5: requests: id 1 is not a head !
> >>>>> virtio_blk virtio1: requests: id 1 is not a head !
> >>>>>
> >>>>> I still see host panics. I will collect the host panic and see if
> >>>>> its still same or not.
> >>>>>
> >>>>> Thanks,
> >>>>> Badari
> >>>>>
> >>>>>
> >>>> Would you please show me how to reproduce it step by step? I tried
> >>>> dd with two block device attached, but didn't get hung nor panic.
> >>>>
> >>>> Yuan
> >>>
> >>> I did 6 "dd"s on 6 block devices..
> >>>
> >>> dd if=/dev/vdb of=/dev/null bs=1M iflag=direct &
> >>> dd if=/dev/vdc of=/dev/null bs=1M iflag=direct &
> >>> dd if=/dev/vdd of=/dev/null bs=1M iflag=direct &
> >>> dd if=/dev/vde of=/dev/null bs=1M iflag=direct &
> >>> dd if=/dev/vdf of=/dev/null bs=1M iflag=direct &
> >>> dd if=/dev/vdg of=/dev/null bs=1M iflag=direct &
> >>>
> >>> I can reproduce the problem with in 3 minutes :(
> >>>
> >>> Thanks,
> >>> Badari
> >>>
> >>>
> >> Ah...I made an embarrassing mistake that I tried to 'free()' an
> >> kmem_cache object.
> >>
> >> Would you please revert the vblk-for-kernel-2 patch and apply the new
> >> one attached in this letter?
> >>
> > Hmm.. My version of the code seems to have kzalloc() for used_info. I
> > don't have a version
> > that is using kmem_cache_alloc(). Would it be possible for you to send
> > out complete patch
> > (with all the fixes applied) for me to try ? This will avoid all the
> > confusion ..
> >
> > Thanks,
> > Badari
> >
>
> Okay, please apply the attached patch to the vanilla kernel. :)
It looks like the patch wouldn't work for testing multiple devices.
vhost_blk_open() does
+ used_info_cachep = KMEM_CACHE(used_info, SLAB_HWCACHE_ALIGN |
SLAB_PANIC);
When opening second device, we get panic since used_info_cachep is
already created. Just to make progress I moved this call to
vhost_blk_init().
I don't see any host panics now. With single block device (dd),
it seems to work fine. But when I start testing multiple block
devices I quickly run into hangs in the guest. I see following
messages in the guest from virtio_ring.c:
virtio_blk virtio2: requests: id 0 is not a head !
virtio_blk virtio1: requests: id 0 is not a head !
virtio_blk virtio4: requests: id 1 is not a head !
virtio_blk virtio3: requests: id 39 is not a head !
Thanks,
Badari
prev parent reply other threads:[~2011-08-10 20:32 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 42+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2011-07-28 14:29 [RFC PATCH]vhost-blk: In-kernel accelerator for virtio block device Liu Yuan
2011-07-28 14:29 ` [RFC PATCH] vhost-blk: An in-kernel accelerator for virtio-blk Liu Yuan
2011-07-28 14:47 ` Christoph Hellwig
2011-07-29 11:19 ` Liu Yuan
2011-07-28 15:18 ` Stefan Hajnoczi
2011-07-28 15:22 ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2011-07-29 15:09 ` Liu Yuan
2011-08-01 6:25 ` Liu Yuan
2011-08-01 8:12 ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2011-08-01 8:55 ` Liu Yuan
2011-08-01 10:26 ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2011-08-11 19:59 ` Dongsu Park
2011-08-12 8:56 ` Alan Cox
2011-07-28 14:29 ` [RFC PATCH] vhost: Enable vhost-blk support Liu Yuan
2011-07-28 15:44 ` [RFC PATCH]vhost-blk: In-kernel accelerator for virtio block device Stefan Hajnoczi
2011-07-29 4:48 ` Stefan Hajnoczi
2011-07-29 7:59 ` Liu Yuan
2011-07-29 10:55 ` Christoph Hellwig
2011-07-29 7:22 ` Liu Yuan
2011-07-29 9:06 ` Stefan Hajnoczi
2011-07-29 12:01 ` Liu Yuan
2011-07-29 12:29 ` Stefan Hajnoczi
2011-07-29 12:50 ` Stefan Hajnoczi
2011-07-29 14:45 ` Liu Yuan
2011-07-29 14:50 ` Liu Yuan
2011-07-29 15:25 ` Sasha Levin
2011-08-01 8:17 ` Avi Kivity
2011-08-01 9:18 ` Liu Yuan
2011-08-01 9:37 ` Avi Kivity
2011-07-29 18:12 ` Badari Pulavarty
2011-08-01 5:46 ` Liu Yuan
2011-08-01 8:12 ` Christoph Hellwig
2011-08-04 21:58 ` Badari Pulavarty
2011-08-05 7:56 ` Liu Yuan
2011-08-05 11:04 ` Liu Yuan
2011-08-05 18:02 ` Badari Pulavarty
2011-08-08 1:35 ` Liu Yuan
2011-08-08 5:04 ` Badari Pulavarty
2011-08-08 7:31 ` Liu Yuan
2011-08-08 17:16 ` Badari Pulavarty
2011-08-10 2:19 ` Liu Yuan
2011-08-10 20:37 ` Badari Pulavarty [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1313008667.9603.14.camel@badari-desktop \
--to=pbadari@us.ibm.com \
--cc=avi@redhat.com \
--cc=khoa@us.ibm.com \
--cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mst@redhat.com \
--cc=namei.unix@gmail.com \
--cc=rusty@rustcorp.com.au \
--cc=stefanha@gmail.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox