From: Joe Perches <joe@perches.com>
To: Jason Baron <jbaron@redhat.com>
Cc: gregkh@suse.de, jim.cromie@gmail.com, bvanassche@acm.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 09/11 re-post] dynamic_debug: consolidate repetitive struct _ddebug descriptor definitions
Date: Thu, 11 Aug 2011 23:39:24 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1313131164.27549.18.camel@Joe-Laptop> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20110811205253.GC6670@redhat.com>
On Thu, 2011-08-11 at 16:52 -0400, Jason Baron wrote:
> Replace the repetitive struct _ddebug descriptor definitions with
> a new DECLARE_DYNAMIC_DEBUG_METADATA(name, fmt) macro.
[]
> diff --git a/include/linux/dynamic_debug.h b/include/linux/dynamic_debug.h
[]
> @@ -54,33 +54,28 @@ extern int __dynamic_netdev_dbg(struct _ddebug *descriptor,
> const char *fmt, ...)
> __attribute__ ((format (printf, 3, 4)));
>
> +#define DECLARE_DYNAMIC_DEBUG_METADATA(name, fmt) \
> + static struct _ddebug name \
> + __used \
> + __attribute__((section("__verbose"), aligned(8))) = \
> + { KBUILD_MODNAME, __func__, __FILE__, fmt, __LINE__, \
> + _DPRINTK_FLAGS_DEFAULT }
Hey again Jason.
>From a kernel coding style consistency POV, shouldn't
this use c99 named initializers?
#define DECLARE_DYNAMIC_DEBUG_METADATA(name, fmt) \
static struct _ddebug name = { \
.modname = KBUILD_MODNAME, \
.function = __func__, \
.filename = __FILE__, \
.format = fmt, \
.lineno = __LINE__, \
.flags = _DPRINTK_FLAGS_DEFAULT, \
.enabled = false, \
} __used __aligned(8) __attribute__((section("__verbose")))
If the pr_debug/dynamic_debug inversion is done,
the .enabled flag should be set on as well when
-DDEBUG is set, correct?
> #define dynamic_pr_debug(fmt, ...) do { \
> - static struct _ddebug descriptor \
> - __used \
> - __attribute__((section("__verbose"), aligned(8))) = \
> - { KBUILD_MODNAME, __func__, __FILE__, fmt, __LINE__, \
> - _DPRINTK_FLAGS_DEFAULT }; \
> + DECLARE_DYNAMIC_DEBUG_METADATA(descriptor, fmt); \
> if (unlikely(descriptor.enabled)) \
> - __dynamic_pr_debug(&descriptor, pr_fmt(fmt), ##__VA_ARGS__); \
> + __dynamic_pr_debug(&descriptor, pr_fmt(fmt), ##__VA_ARGS__);\
> } while (0)
Perhaps
#define dynamic_pr_debug(fmt, ...) \
do { \
DECLARE_DYNAMIC_DEBUG_METADATA(descriptor, fmt); \
if (unlikely(descriptor.enabled)) \
__dynamic_pr_debug(&descriptor, pr_fmt(fmt), \
##__VA_ARGS__); \
} while (0)
Lastly, are the unlikely()s really useful?
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2011-08-12 6:39 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 29+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2011-08-11 18:36 [PATCH 00/11] various fixes v3 Jason Baron
2011-08-11 18:36 ` [PATCH 01/11] dynamic_debug: Add __dynamic_dev_dbg Jason Baron
2011-08-11 18:36 ` [PATCH 02/11] dynamic_debug: Consolidate prefix output to single routine Jason Baron
2011-08-11 18:36 ` [PATCH 03/11] dynamic_debug: Remove uses of KERN_CONT in dynamic_emit_prefix Jason Baron
2011-08-11 18:36 ` [PATCH 04/11] dynamic_debug: Convert printks to pr_<level> Jason Baron
2011-08-11 18:36 ` [PATCH 05/11] dynamic_debug: remove unused control variables Jason Baron
2011-08-11 18:36 ` [PATCH 06/11] dynamic_debug: add Jason Baron as maintainer Jason Baron
2011-08-11 18:36 ` [PATCH 07/11] dynamic_debug: make netdev_dbg() call __netdev_printk() Jason Baron
2011-09-01 14:57 ` [PATCH ] dynamic_debug: call __netdev_printk only for CONFIG_NET Arnd Bergmann
2011-09-01 15:18 ` Jason Baron
2011-09-18 8:27 ` Greg KH
2011-09-18 17:21 ` Randy Dunlap
2011-09-18 18:27 ` Greg KH
2011-09-18 18:42 ` Randy Dunlap
2011-09-19 13:48 ` Jason Baron
2011-09-19 16:49 ` Randy Dunlap
2011-08-11 18:36 ` [PATCH 08/11] dynamic_debug: make netif_dbg() call __netdev_printk() Jason Baron
2011-08-11 18:36 ` [PATCH 09/11] dynamic_debug: consolidate repetitive struct _ddebug descriptor definitions Jason Baron
2011-08-11 19:02 ` Joe Perches
2011-08-11 20:52 ` [PATCH 09/11 re-post] " Jason Baron
2011-08-12 6:39 ` Joe Perches [this message]
2011-08-15 20:44 ` [PATCH 09/11 re-post take #2] " Jason Baron
2011-08-15 23:12 ` Joe Perches
2011-08-16 13:59 ` Jason Baron
2011-08-11 18:37 ` [PATCH 10/11] dynamic_debug: remove num_enabled accounting Jason Baron
2011-08-11 18:37 ` [PATCH 11/11] dynamic_debug: use a single printk() to emit msgs Jason Baron
2011-08-23 1:32 ` [PATCH 00/11] various fixes v3 Greg KH
2011-08-23 13:54 ` Jason Baron
2011-08-23 15:15 ` Greg KH
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1313131164.27549.18.camel@Joe-Laptop \
--to=joe@perches.com \
--cc=bvanassche@acm.org \
--cc=gregkh@suse.de \
--cc=jbaron@redhat.com \
--cc=jim.cromie@gmail.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox