From: Dan Williams <dcbw@redhat.com>
To: Valdis.Kletnieks@vt.edu
Cc: "Gábor Stefanik" <netrolller.3d@gmail.com>,
"Pavel Ivanov" <paivanof@gmail.com>,
"Luis R. Rodriguez" <lrodriguez@atheros.com>,
"Jouni Malinen" <jmalinen@atheros.com>,
"Vasanthakumar Thiagarajan" <vasanth@atheros.com>,
"Senthil Balasubramanian" <senthilkumar@atheros.com>,
linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org, ath9k-devel@venema.h4ckr.net,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] ath9k: make driver usable standalone
Date: Thu, 18 Aug 2011 14:18:09 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1313695090.23920.2.camel@dcbw.foobar.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <24649.1313621503@turing-police.cc.vt.edu>
On Wed, 2011-08-17 at 18:51 -0400, Valdis.Kletnieks@vt.edu wrote:
> On Wed, 17 Aug 2011 18:25:49 +0200, Gábor Stefanik said:
>
> > Iwconfig and iwlist are themselves deprecated. Iw is the new wireless
> > configuration tool.
>
> Somebody better tell Fedora Rawhide - as of the version released on July 27,
> their 'initscripts' RPM was still using iwconfig in /etc/sysconfig/network-scripts/ifup-wireless
>
> So don't be quite so fast to be declaring WIRELESS_EXT dead just yet.
Given that nobody has stepped up to write patches to convert them to use
iw (or wpa_supplicant in the *correct* manner), and that for the most
part wifi on Fedora goes through NetworkManager and/or wpa_supplicant,
it's not surprising. I don't have any particular interest in keeping
the existing ifup-wireless iwconfig hackery around, instead if it's
converted at all, it should be converted to use wpa_supplicant instead,
in the manner in which I've described in the various bug reports that
keep coming up. That means not just pointing wpa_supplicant at a config
file, but instead keeping the options in the ifcfg file and writing out
a temporary wpa_supplicant config on-the-fly so that it integrates with
existing administrator expectations and workflow.
Dan
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2011-08-18 19:15 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 16+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2011-08-17 3:28 [PATCH] ath9k: make driver usable standalone Pavel Ivanov
2011-08-17 5:57 ` Gábor Stefanik
2011-08-17 15:56 ` Pavel Ivanov
2011-08-17 16:25 ` Gábor Stefanik
2011-08-17 22:51 ` Valdis.Kletnieks
2011-08-17 23:20 ` Larry Finger
2011-08-18 19:18 ` Dan Williams [this message]
2011-08-18 4:01 ` Pavel Ivanov
2011-08-18 5:19 ` Adrian Chadd
2011-08-18 19:20 ` Dan Williams
2011-08-18 19:30 ` Pavel Ivanov
2011-08-18 20:35 ` Dan Williams
2011-08-18 22:56 ` Pavel Ivanov
2011-08-19 1:25 ` Johannes Berg
2011-08-19 4:27 ` Pavel Ivanov
2011-08-18 21:26 ` Luis R. Rodriguez
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1313695090.23920.2.camel@dcbw.foobar.com \
--to=dcbw@redhat.com \
--cc=Valdis.Kletnieks@vt.edu \
--cc=ath9k-devel@venema.h4ckr.net \
--cc=jmalinen@atheros.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=lrodriguez@atheros.com \
--cc=netrolller.3d@gmail.com \
--cc=paivanof@gmail.com \
--cc=senthilkumar@atheros.com \
--cc=vasanth@atheros.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox