From: Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>
To: rjw@sisk.pl, menage@google.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Cc: arnd@arndb.de, oleg@redhat.com, Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>
Subject: [PATCH 05/16] freezer: rename thaw_process() to __thaw_task() and simplify the implementation
Date: Fri, 19 Aug 2011 16:16:11 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1313763382-12341-6-git-send-email-tj@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1313763382-12341-1-git-send-email-tj@kernel.org>
thaw_process() now has only internal users - system and cgroup
freezers. Remove the unnecessary return value, rename, unexport and
collapse __thaw_process() into it. This will help further updates to
the freezer code.
Signed-off-by: Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>
Cc: Paul Menage <menage@google.com>
---
include/linux/freezer.h | 3 +--
kernel/cgroup_freezer.c | 7 +++----
kernel/freezer.c | 30 +++++++++++-------------------
kernel/power/process.c | 2 +-
4 files changed, 16 insertions(+), 26 deletions(-)
diff --git a/include/linux/freezer.h b/include/linux/freezer.h
index 8ee31e5..80a455d 100644
--- a/include/linux/freezer.h
+++ b/include/linux/freezer.h
@@ -45,7 +45,7 @@ static inline bool should_send_signal(struct task_struct *p)
}
/* Takes and releases task alloc lock using task_lock() */
-extern int thaw_process(struct task_struct *p);
+extern void __thaw_task(struct task_struct *t);
extern bool __refrigerator(bool check_kthr_stop);
extern int freeze_processes(void);
@@ -167,7 +167,6 @@ static inline int frozen(struct task_struct *p) { return 0; }
static inline int freezing(struct task_struct *p) { return 0; }
static inline void set_freeze_flag(struct task_struct *p) {}
static inline void clear_freeze_flag(struct task_struct *p) {}
-static inline int thaw_process(struct task_struct *p) { return 1; }
static inline bool __refrigerator(bool check_kthr_stop) { return false; }
static inline int freeze_processes(void) { BUG(); return 0; }
diff --git a/kernel/cgroup_freezer.c b/kernel/cgroup_freezer.c
index e691818..e7fa0ec 100644
--- a/kernel/cgroup_freezer.c
+++ b/kernel/cgroup_freezer.c
@@ -130,7 +130,7 @@ struct cgroup_subsys freezer_subsys;
* write_lock css_set_lock (cgroup iterator start)
* task->alloc_lock
* read_lock css_set_lock (cgroup iterator start)
- * task->alloc_lock (inside thaw_process(), prevents race with refrigerator())
+ * task->alloc_lock (inside __thaw_task(), prevents race with refrigerator())
* sighand->siglock
*/
static struct cgroup_subsys_state *freezer_create(struct cgroup_subsys *ss,
@@ -300,9 +300,8 @@ static void unfreeze_cgroup(struct cgroup *cgroup, struct freezer *freezer)
struct task_struct *task;
cgroup_iter_start(cgroup, &it);
- while ((task = cgroup_iter_next(cgroup, &it))) {
- thaw_process(task);
- }
+ while ((task = cgroup_iter_next(cgroup, &it)))
+ __thaw_task(task);
cgroup_iter_end(cgroup, &it);
freezer->state = CGROUP_THAWED;
diff --git a/kernel/freezer.c b/kernel/freezer.c
index 656492c..f5db7fd 100644
--- a/kernel/freezer.c
+++ b/kernel/freezer.c
@@ -145,18 +145,8 @@ void cancel_freezing(struct task_struct *p)
}
}
-static int __thaw_process(struct task_struct *p)
-{
- if (frozen(p)) {
- p->flags &= ~PF_FROZEN;
- return 1;
- }
- clear_freeze_flag(p);
- return 0;
-}
-
/*
- * Wake up a frozen process
+ * Wake up a frozen task
*
* task_lock() is needed to prevent the race with refrigerator() which may
* occur if the freezing of tasks fails. Namely, without the lock, if the
@@ -164,15 +154,17 @@ static int __thaw_process(struct task_struct *p)
* refrigerator() could call frozen_process(), in which case the task would be
* frozen and no one would thaw it.
*/
-int thaw_process(struct task_struct *p)
+void __thaw_task(struct task_struct *p)
{
+ bool was_frozen;
+
task_lock(p);
- if (__thaw_process(p) == 1) {
- task_unlock(p);
- wake_up_process(p);
- return 1;
- }
+ if ((was_frozen = frozen(p)))
+ p->flags &= ~PF_FROZEN;
+ else
+ clear_freeze_flag(p);
task_unlock(p);
- return 0;
+
+ if (was_frozen)
+ wake_up_process(p);
}
-EXPORT_SYMBOL(thaw_process);
diff --git a/kernel/power/process.c b/kernel/power/process.c
index 0cf3a27..bec09c3 100644
--- a/kernel/power/process.c
+++ b/kernel/power/process.c
@@ -176,7 +176,7 @@ static void thaw_tasks(bool nosig_only)
if (cgroup_freezing_or_frozen(p))
continue;
- thaw_process(p);
+ __thaw_task(p);
} while_each_thread(g, p);
read_unlock(&tasklist_lock);
}
--
1.7.6
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2011-08-19 14:19 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 79+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2011-08-19 14:16 [PATCHSET] freezer: fix various bugs and simplify implementation Tejun Heo
2011-08-19 14:16 ` [PATCH 01/16] freezer: fix current->state restoration race in refrigerator() Tejun Heo
2011-08-19 15:52 ` Oleg Nesterov
2011-08-19 16:11 ` Tejun Heo
2011-08-19 21:08 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2011-08-20 8:13 ` Tejun Heo
2011-08-19 14:16 ` [PATCH 02/16] freezer: don't unnecessarily set PF_NOFREEZE explicitly Tejun Heo
2011-08-19 16:43 ` Gustavo Padovan
2011-08-22 15:05 ` Samuel Ortiz
2011-08-19 14:16 ` [PATCH 03/16] freezer: unexport refrigerator() and update try_to_freeze() slightly Tejun Heo
2011-08-19 14:16 ` [PATCH 04/16] freezer: implement and use kthread_freezable_should_stop() Tejun Heo
2011-08-19 20:07 ` Henrique de Moraes Holschuh
2011-08-21 19:14 ` Oleg Nesterov
2011-08-22 9:53 ` Tejun Heo
2011-08-23 15:42 ` Oleg Nesterov
2011-08-19 14:16 ` Tejun Heo [this message]
2011-08-19 15:37 ` [PATCH 05/16] freezer: rename thaw_process() to __thaw_task() and simplify the implementation Paul Menage
2011-08-24 2:28 ` Matt Helsley
2011-08-19 14:16 ` [PATCH 06/16] freezer: make exiting tasks properly unfreezable Tejun Heo
2011-08-23 15:52 ` Oleg Nesterov
2011-08-23 19:44 ` Tejun Heo
2011-08-24 14:14 ` Oleg Nesterov
2011-08-25 15:59 ` Tejun Heo
2011-08-25 16:56 ` Oleg Nesterov
2011-08-25 21:01 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2011-08-25 21:54 ` Tejun Heo
2011-08-26 21:09 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2011-08-27 10:35 ` Tejun Heo
2011-08-27 10:51 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2011-08-27 11:02 ` Tejun Heo
2011-08-27 12:22 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2011-08-25 21:52 ` Tejun Heo
2011-08-24 22:34 ` Matt Helsley
2011-08-25 15:25 ` Oleg Nesterov
2011-08-25 16:11 ` Tejun Heo
2011-08-19 14:16 ` [PATCH 07/16] freezer: don't distinguish nosig tasks on thaw Tejun Heo
2011-08-19 21:14 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2011-08-20 8:10 ` Tejun Heo
2011-08-20 8:39 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2011-08-19 14:16 ` [PATCH 08/16] freezer: use dedicated lock instead of task_lock() + memory barrier Tejun Heo
2011-08-28 17:51 ` Oleg Nesterov
2011-08-28 18:21 ` Oleg Nesterov
2011-08-29 7:20 ` Tejun Heo
2011-08-19 14:16 ` [PATCH 09/16] freezer: make freezing indicate freeze condition in effect Tejun Heo
2011-08-28 17:56 ` Oleg Nesterov
2011-08-29 7:31 ` Tejun Heo
2011-08-29 17:44 ` Oleg Nesterov
2011-08-19 14:16 ` [PATCH 10/16] freezer: fix set_freezable[_with_signal]() race Tejun Heo
2011-08-28 18:01 ` Oleg Nesterov
2011-08-29 7:38 ` Tejun Heo
2011-08-19 14:16 ` [PATCH 11/16] freezer: kill PF_FREEZING Tejun Heo
2011-08-19 14:16 ` [PATCH 12/16] freezer: clean up freeze_processes() failure path Tejun Heo
2011-08-28 18:09 ` Oleg Nesterov
2011-08-29 7:28 ` Tejun Heo
2011-08-29 7:40 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2011-08-19 14:16 ` [PATCH 13/16] cgroup_freezer: prepare for removal of TIF_FREEZE Tejun Heo
2011-08-19 15:40 ` Paul Menage
2011-08-28 17:39 ` Oleg Nesterov
2011-08-29 6:30 ` Tejun Heo
2011-08-19 14:16 ` [PATCH 14/16] freezer: make freezing() test freeze conditions in effect instead " Tejun Heo
2011-08-19 15:43 ` Paul Menage
2011-08-29 15:49 ` Oleg Nesterov
2011-08-29 15:56 ` Oleg Nesterov
2011-08-29 16:30 ` Oleg Nesterov
2011-08-29 16:17 ` Oleg Nesterov
2011-08-19 14:16 ` [PATCH 15/16] freezer: remove now unused TIF_FREEZE Tejun Heo
2011-08-19 14:16 ` [PATCH 16/16] freezer: remove should_send_signal() and update frozen() Tejun Heo
2011-08-19 14:23 ` [PATCHSET] freezer: fix various bugs and simplify implementation Tejun Heo
2011-08-19 15:34 ` Paul Menage
2011-08-19 16:25 ` Tejun Heo
2011-08-24 1:10 ` Matt Helsley
2011-08-19 21:00 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2011-08-20 8:14 ` Tejun Heo
2011-09-05 8:52 ` [BUG] CPU hotplug, freezer: Freezing of tasks failed after 20.00 seconds Srivatsa S. Bhat
2011-09-05 14:15 ` Tejun Heo
2011-09-06 5:08 ` Tejun Heo
2011-09-06 6:01 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2011-10-02 19:13 ` Srivatsa S. Bhat
2011-10-02 19:33 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1313763382-12341-6-git-send-email-tj@kernel.org \
--to=tj@kernel.org \
--cc=arnd@arndb.de \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=menage@google.com \
--cc=oleg@redhat.com \
--cc=rjw@sisk.pl \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox