public inbox for linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
To: Don Zickus <dzickus@redhat.com>
Cc: x86@kernel.org, Andi Kleen <andi@firstfloor.org>,
	Robert Richter <robert.richter@amd.com>,
	ying.huang@intel.com, LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	jason.wessel@windriver.com
Subject: Re: [RFC][PATCH 4/6] x86, nmi:  add in logic to handle multiple events and unknown NMIs
Date: Mon, 22 Aug 2011 16:22:15 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <1314022935.24275.35.camel@twins> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1313786266-9585-5-git-send-email-dzickus@redhat.com>

On Fri, 2011-08-19 at 16:37 -0400, Don Zickus wrote:
> @@ -260,6 +260,8 @@ unknown_nmi_error(unsigned char reason, struct pt_regs *regs)
>         pr_emerg("Dazed and confused, but trying to continue\n");
>  }
>  
> +DEFINE_PER_CPU(bool, swallow_nmi);
> +
>  static notrace __kprobes void default_do_nmi(struct pt_regs *regs)
>  {
>         unsigned char reason = 0;
> @@ -271,8 +273,28 @@ static notrace __kprobes void default_do_nmi(struct pt_regs *regs)
>          * NMI can not be detected/processed on other CPUs.
>          */
>         handled = nmi_handle(NMI_LOCAL, regs);
> -       if (handled)
> +       if (handled) {
> +               /*
> +                * When handling multiple NMI events, we are not
> +                * sure if the second NMI was dropped (because of
> +                * too many NMIs), piggy-backed on the same NMI
> +                * (perf) or is queued right behind this NMI.
> +                * In the last case, we may accidentally get an
> +                * unknown NMI because the event is already handled.
> +                * Flag for this condition and swallow it later.
> +                *
> +                * FIXME: This detection has holes in it mainly
> +                * because we can't tell _when_ the next NMI comes
> +                * in.  A multi-handled NMI event followed by an 
> +                * unknown NMI a second later, clearly should not
> +                * be swallowed.
> +                */
> +               if (handled > 1)
> +                       __this_cpu_write(swallow_nmi, true);
> +               else
> +                       __this_cpu_write(swallow_nmi, false);
>                 return;
> +       }
>  
>         /* Non-CPU-specific NMI: NMI sources can be processed on any CPU */
>         raw_spin_lock(&nmi_reason_lock);
> @@ -296,6 +318,8 @@ static notrace __kprobes void default_do_nmi(struct pt_regs *regs)
>         raw_spin_unlock(&nmi_reason_lock);
>  
>         unknown_nmi_error(reason, regs);
> +
> +       __this_cpu_write(swallow_nmi, false);
>  } 

All writes, no reads... the actual dropping of NMIs got lost and now
lives in patch 5 which purports to be about statistics only.

  reply	other threads:[~2011-08-22 14:23 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 26+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2011-08-19 20:37 [RFC][PATCH 0/6] x86, nmi: new NMI handling routines Don Zickus
2011-08-19 20:37 ` [RFC][PATCH 1/6] x86, nmi: split out nmi from traps.c Don Zickus
2011-08-19 20:37 ` [RFC][PATCH 2/6] x86, nmi: create new NMI handler routines Don Zickus
2011-08-22 14:13   ` Peter Zijlstra
2011-08-22 15:21     ` Don Zickus
2011-08-22 15:26       ` Peter Zijlstra
2011-08-22 15:41         ` Don Zickus
2011-08-22 15:31       ` Peter Zijlstra
2011-08-22 14:16   ` Peter Zijlstra
2011-08-22 15:23     ` Don Zickus
2011-08-23 14:14     ` Don Zickus
2011-08-23 14:17       ` Peter Zijlstra
2011-08-24 17:04   ` Paul E. McKenney
2011-08-24 17:44     ` Don Zickus
2011-08-24 17:51       ` Peter Zijlstra
2011-08-24 18:16         ` Don Zickus
2011-08-24 18:19           ` Peter Zijlstra
2011-08-24 19:16             ` Paul E. McKenney
2011-08-19 20:37 ` [RFC][PATCH 3/6] x86, nmi: wire up NMI handlers to new routines Don Zickus
2011-08-19 20:37 ` [RFC][PATCH 4/6] x86, nmi: add in logic to handle multiple events and unknown NMIs Don Zickus
2011-08-22 14:22   ` Peter Zijlstra [this message]
2011-08-22 15:25     ` Don Zickus
2011-08-19 20:37 ` [RFC][PATCH 5/6] x86, nmi: track NMI usage stats Don Zickus
2011-08-19 20:37 ` [RFC][PATCH 6/6] x86, nmi: print out NMI stats in /proc/interrupts Don Zickus
2011-08-22 14:27   ` Peter Zijlstra
2011-08-22 15:28     ` Don Zickus

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=1314022935.24275.35.camel@twins \
    --to=peterz@infradead.org \
    --cc=andi@firstfloor.org \
    --cc=dzickus@redhat.com \
    --cc=jason.wessel@windriver.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=robert.richter@amd.com \
    --cc=x86@kernel.org \
    --cc=ying.huang@intel.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox