From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1754758Ab1HWC1H (ORCPT ); Mon, 22 Aug 2011 22:27:07 -0400 Received: from mga02.intel.com ([134.134.136.20]:22287 "EHLO mga02.intel.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751743Ab1HWC1E (ORCPT ); Mon, 22 Aug 2011 22:27:04 -0400 X-ExtLoop1: 1 X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.67,351,1309762800"; d="asc'?scan'208";a="40807038" Subject: Re: linux-next: boot test failure (net tree) From: Jeff Kirsher Reply-To: jeffrey.t.kirsher@intel.com To: David Miller Cc: "sfr@canb.auug.org.au" , "netdev@vger.kernel.org" , "linux-next@vger.kernel.org" , "linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" , "mikey@neuling.org" , "torvalds@linux-foundation.org" , "akpm@linux-foundation.org" , "linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org" , "benh@kernel.crashing.org" , "paulus@samba.org" Date: Mon, 22 Aug 2011 19:26:56 -0700 In-Reply-To: <20110822.191348.2099822249437201579.davem@davemloft.net> References: <20110822113032.15087c2e190e2b0c3ee7dfb8@canb.auug.org.au> <20110823114011.a059aea0138b75bfa7eed1ce@canb.auug.org.au> <20110823114129.ceb18da164bf7df3c145941b@canb.auug.org.au> <20110822.191348.2099822249437201579.davem@davemloft.net> Organization: Intel Corporation Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg="pgp-sha1"; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="=-vI3u4LL8ZvB8+NGeDtWS" X-Mailer: Evolution 3.0.2 (3.0.2-3.fc15) Message-ID: <1314066417.2128.215.camel@jtkirshe-mobl> Mime-Version: 1.0 Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org --=-vI3u4LL8ZvB8+NGeDtWS Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Mon, 2011-08-22 at 19:13 -0700, David Miller wrote: > From: Stephen Rothwell > Date: Tue, 23 Aug 2011 11:41:29 +1000 >=20 > > On Tue, 23 Aug 2011 11:40:11 +1000 Stephen Rothwell wrote: > >> > >> On Mon, 22 Aug 2011 11:30:32 +1000 Stephen Rothwell wrote: > >> > > >> > Here's what I am applying as a merge fixup to the net tree today so = that > >> > my ppc64_defconfig builds actually build more or less the same set o= f > >> > drivers as before this rearrangement. > >>=20 > >> And this today: > >=20 > > And this: >=20 > I'm starting to get uncomfortable with this whole situation, and I > feel more and more that these new kconfig guards are not tenable. >=20 > Changing defconfig files might fix the "automated test boot with > defconfig" case but it won't fix the case of someone trying to > automate a build and boot using a different, existing, config file. > It ought to work too, and I do know people really do this. >=20 > And just the fact that we would have to merge all of these defconfig chan= ges > through the networking tree is evidence of how it's really not reasonable > to be doing things this way. >=20 > Jeff, I think we need to revert the dependencies back to what they were > before the drivers/net moves. Could you prepare a patch which does that? >=20 I was just finishing up those patches (not including any defconfig changes) and started looking at a patch to fix/resolve the issues that Stephen is seeing. Let me see what I can come up with tonight to resolve this. --=-vI3u4LL8ZvB8+NGeDtWS Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" Content-Description: This is a digitally signed message part Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.11 (GNU/Linux) iQEcBAABAgAGBQJOUw/wAAoJECTsCADr/EWU9q4H/3UFk+821Pdb0/jiVN0ve+ea IAyxA4WfWT/9y4wW3FSoWGc2YXZygmtYMcSXxqMw4FTFeQbrvFNNRMG0pmklmnwM dc6EQtjP2Zj23jGe4B/a06/XzsJj8ebsoR7/JW8cWrD3Nhcz8+pSxL9hij2tu/ML JCZkmLMyYr5RjBZ6yE8f2ahIuAc/OKKlrrb7xyQz0f/Wgqt29Jif+EgSjlOIyVHO /ud++xCdDbv/rdLEK8gpAiaxoTh+YhopPkt8cXQc6y77AF8L9pvSQ9s3BNerBzJo ZxpQz1LBlM4K6femZzfAVUpSv0Y/37nwmLDcQoITkc700UinJEjxnsJ64QWHphs= =ZIWS -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --=-vI3u4LL8ZvB8+NGeDtWS--