From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1754861Ab1HYRc4 (ORCPT ); Thu, 25 Aug 2011 13:32:56 -0400 Received: from casper.infradead.org ([85.118.1.10]:44975 "EHLO casper.infradead.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1753697Ab1HYRcz convert rfc822-to-8bit (ORCPT ); Thu, 25 Aug 2011 13:32:55 -0400 Subject: Re: [BUG] perf_event: semantic of PERF_SAMPLE_READ unclear From: Peter Zijlstra To: Stephane Eranian Cc: LKML , mingo@elte.hu, Robert Richter , Vince Weaver Date: Thu, 25 Aug 2011 19:32:40 +0200 In-Reply-To: References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8BIT X-Mailer: Evolution 3.0.2- Message-ID: <1314293560.27911.38.camel@twins> Mime-Version: 1.0 Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Thu, 2011-08-25 at 19:19 +0200, Stephane Eranian wrote: > But the difficulty is that > we cannot grab any locks, not sure we need one given the call path. Nah we should be able to simply iterate all siblings and update them in-place, since its group members they should all be co-scheduled. The only difficulty is cross pmu group members..