From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1753783Ab1H2OZq (ORCPT ); Mon, 29 Aug 2011 10:25:46 -0400 Received: from merlin.infradead.org ([205.233.59.134]:44265 "EHLO merlin.infradead.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1753603Ab1H2OZj convert rfc822-to-8bit (ORCPT ); Mon, 29 Aug 2011 10:25:39 -0400 Subject: Re: [PATCH 05/32] nohz: Move rcu dynticks idle mode handling to idle enter/exit APIs From: Peter Zijlstra To: Frederic Weisbecker Cc: LKML , Andrew Morton , Anton Blanchard , Avi Kivity , Ingo Molnar , Lai Jiangshan , "Paul E . McKenney" , Paul Menage , Stephen Hemminger , Thomas Gleixner , Tim Pepper Date: Mon, 29 Aug 2011 16:25:22 +0200 In-Reply-To: <1313423549-27093-6-git-send-email-fweisbec@gmail.com> References: <1313423549-27093-1-git-send-email-fweisbec@gmail.com> <1313423549-27093-6-git-send-email-fweisbec@gmail.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8BIT X-Mailer: Evolution 3.0.2- Message-ID: <1314627922.2816.65.camel@twins> Mime-Version: 1.0 Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Mon, 2011-08-15 at 17:52 +0200, Frederic Weisbecker wrote: > To prepare for nohz / idle logic split, pull out the rcu dynticks > idle mode switching to strict idle entry/exit areas. > > So we make the dyntick mode possible without always involving rcu > extended quiescent state. Why is this a good thing? I would be thinking that if we're a userspace bound task and we disable the tick rcu would be finished on this cpu and thus the extended quiescent state is just what we want?