Re: [PATCH 04/32] nohz: Separate idle sleeping time accounting from nohz switching

Frederic Weisbecker
2011-08-29T17:01:52Z

On Mon, Aug 29, 2011 at 04:23:29PM +0200, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> On Mon, 2011-08-15 at 17:52 +0200, Frederic Weisbecker wrote:
> > +extern void tick_nohz_exit_idle(void);
> > +extern void tick_nohz_irq_exit(void);
>
> For consistencies sake, pick either tick_nohz_exit_*() or
> tick_nohz_*_exit() but don't go mix and match (I prefer the former).

Agreed, I will.

> Also, there isn't a matching irq_enter() callback..

Yeah, probably tick_check_nohz() should be renamed accordingly.