From: Joe Perches <joe@perches.com>
To: David Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
Cc: eric.dumazet@gmail.com, vladislav.yasevich@hp.com,
sri@us.ibm.com, linux-sctp@vger.kernel.org,
netdev@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 18/24] sctp: Remove unnecessary OOM logging messages
Date: Wed, 31 Aug 2011 17:25:11 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1314836711.27632.34.camel@Joe-Laptop> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20110829.181520.933815499847625814.davem@davemloft.net>
On Mon, 2011-08-29 at 18:15 -0400, David Miller wrote:
> From: Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@gmail.com>
> Date: Mon, 29 Aug 2011 23:51:21 +0200
> > Le lundi 29 août 2011 à 23:43 +0200, Eric Dumazet a écrit :
> >> Furthermore, a failed vmalloc() is not guaranteed to emit an OOM
> >> message, is it ?
> > It currently displays a message without context :
> > vmap allocation for size XXXXXX failed: use vmalloc=<size> to increase
> > size.
> > So we dont know which part of the kernel asked this allocation.
> > Please dont remove existing error messages after failed vmalloc() calls.
> Indeed.
> Joe, these vmalloc() and also the __GFP_NOWARN cases will need to be
> attended to and this series resubmitted as such.
No worries.
Andrew Morton picked up a patch I posted that
changes vmalloc to be similar to kmalloc when
the pointer returned is NULL (OOM). It now
uses dump_stack for those cases.
https://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/1114682/
I'll keep all the current vmalloc failure messages
for now and resubmit in a day or two this series
with acks. Not batman or netfilter though as they
were picked up by their maintainers.
A month or two after the vmalloc patch hits
mainline and/or wider testing, and it's deemed
acceptable, removing vmalloc site specific OOM
messages should be appropriate.
Anyone object?
I plan on submitting drivers/net OOM removals
next week.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2011-09-01 0:25 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 48+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2011-08-29 21:17 [PATCH 00/24] net: Remove unnecessary OOM logging messages Joe Perches
2011-08-29 21:17 ` [PATCH 01/24] 802: " Joe Perches
2011-08-29 21:17 ` [PATCH 02/24] 9p: " Joe Perches
2011-08-29 21:17 ` [PATCH 03/24] atm: " Joe Perches
2011-08-29 21:17 ` [PATCH 04/24] ax25: " Joe Perches
2011-08-29 22:42 ` Joerg Reuter
2011-08-29 21:17 ` [PATCH 05/24] batman-adv: " Joe Perches
2011-08-30 10:58 ` [B.A.T.M.A.N.] " Marek Lindner
2011-08-29 21:17 ` [PATCH 06/24] netfilter: " Joe Perches
2011-08-30 12:46 ` Patrick McHardy
2011-08-30 16:13 ` Joe Perches
2011-08-30 17:55 ` David Miller
2011-08-31 10:13 ` Patrick McHardy
2011-10-11 0:15 ` Pablo Neira Ayuso
2011-08-29 21:17 ` [PATCH 07/24] can: " Joe Perches
2011-08-31 17:11 ` Oliver Hartkopp
2011-08-29 21:17 ` [PATCH 08/24] ceph: " Joe Perches
2011-08-29 21:17 ` [PATCH 09/24] decnet: " Joe Perches
2011-08-29 21:17 ` [PATCH 10/24] econet: " Joe Perches
2011-08-29 21:17 ` [PATCH 11/24] iucv: " Joe Perches
2011-08-29 21:17 ` [PATCH 12/24] mac80211: " Joe Perches
2011-08-29 21:17 ` [PATCH 13/24] netrom: " Joe Perches
2011-08-29 21:17 ` [PATCH 14/24] rds: " Joe Perches
2011-08-29 21:17 ` [PATCH 15/24] rfkill: " Joe Perches
2011-08-29 21:17 ` [PATCH 16/24] rose: " Joe Perches
2011-08-29 21:17 ` [PATCH 17/24] sched: " Joe Perches
2011-08-30 22:27 ` jamal
2011-08-29 21:17 ` [PATCH 18/24] sctp: " Joe Perches
2011-08-29 21:29 ` Vladislav Yasevich
2011-08-29 21:43 ` Eric Dumazet
2011-08-29 21:51 ` Eric Dumazet
2011-08-29 22:15 ` David Miller
2011-09-01 0:25 ` Joe Perches [this message]
2011-08-30 1:21 ` Joe Perches
2011-08-29 21:17 ` [PATCH 19/24] sunrpc: " Joe Perches
2011-08-29 21:36 ` Myklebust, Trond
2011-08-29 21:37 ` David Miller
2011-08-29 21:54 ` Boaz Harrosh
2011-08-29 22:03 ` David Miller
2011-08-29 23:25 ` Myklebust, Trond
2011-08-29 23:33 ` Boaz Harrosh
2011-08-30 2:35 ` David Miller
2011-08-29 22:08 ` Myklebust, Trond
2011-08-29 21:17 ` [PATCH 20/24] tipc: " Joe Perches
2011-08-29 21:17 ` [PATCH 21/24] wanrouter: " Joe Perches
2011-08-29 21:17 ` [PATCH 22/24] wireless: " Joe Perches
2011-08-29 21:17 ` [PATCH 23/24] x25: " Joe Perches
2011-08-29 21:17 ` [PATCH 24/24] net: " Joe Perches
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1314836711.27632.34.camel@Joe-Laptop \
--to=joe@perches.com \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=eric.dumazet@gmail.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-sctp@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=sri@us.ibm.com \
--cc=vladislav.yasevich@hp.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox