Re: [PATCH 2/5] writeback: dirty position control

Peter Zijlstra
2011-08-26T13:19:08Z

On Fri, 2011-08-26 at 21:13 +0800, Wu Fengguang wrote:
> We got similar result as in the read disturber case, even though one
> disturbs N and the other impacts writeout bandwith. The original
> patchset is consistently performing much better :)

It does indeed, and I figure on these timescales it makes sense to
assumes N is a constant. Fair enough, thanks!