From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1751981Ab1IFQTS (ORCPT ); Tue, 6 Sep 2011 12:19:18 -0400 Received: from casper.infradead.org ([85.118.1.10]:43217 "EHLO casper.infradead.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751923Ab1IFQTJ convert rfc822-to-8bit (ORCPT ); Tue, 6 Sep 2011 12:19:09 -0400 Subject: Re: [PATCH 17/18] writeback: fix dirtied pages accounting on redirty From: Peter Zijlstra To: Wu Fengguang Cc: linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org, Andrew Morton , Jan Kara , Christoph Hellwig , Dave Chinner , Greg Thelen , Minchan Kim , Vivek Goyal , Andrea Righi , linux-mm , LKML Date: Tue, 06 Sep 2011 18:18:56 +0200 In-Reply-To: <20110904020916.841463184@intel.com> References: <20110904015305.367445271@intel.com> <20110904020916.841463184@intel.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8BIT X-Mailer: Evolution 3.0.2- Message-ID: <1315325936.14232.22.camel@twins> Mime-Version: 1.0 Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Sun, 2011-09-04 at 09:53 +0800, Wu Fengguang wrote: > De-account the accumulative dirty counters on page redirty. > > Page redirties (very common in ext4) will introduce mismatch between > counters (a) and (b) > > a) NR_DIRTIED, BDI_DIRTIED, tsk->nr_dirtied > b) NR_WRITTEN, BDI_WRITTEN > > This will introduce systematic errors in balanced_rate and result in > dirty page position errors (ie. the dirty pages are no longer balanced > around the global/bdi setpoints). > So wtf is ext4 doing? Shouldn't a page stay dirty until its written out? That is, should we really frob around this behaviour or fix ext4 because its on crack?