From: "Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Cc: mingo@elte.hu, laijs@cn.fujitsu.com, dipankar@in.ibm.com,
akpm@linux-foundation.org, mathieu.desnoyers@polymtl.ca,
josh@joshtriplett.org, niv@us.ibm.com, tglx@linutronix.de,
peterz@infradead.org, rostedt@goodmis.org,
Valdis.Kletnieks@vt.edu, dhowells@redhat.com,
eric.dumazet@gmail.com, darren@dvhart.com, patches@linaro.org,
"Paul E. McKenney" <paul.mckenney@linaro.org>,
"Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Subject: [PATCH tip/core/rcu 23/55] rcu: Simplify quiescent-state accounting
Date: Tue, 6 Sep 2011 11:00:17 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1315332049-2604-23-git-send-email-paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20110906180015.GA2560@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
From: Paul E. McKenney <paul.mckenney@linaro.org>
There is often a delay between the time that a CPU passes through a
quiescent state and the time that this quiescent state is reported to the
RCU core. It is quite possible that the grace period ended before the
quiescent state could be reported, for example, some other CPU might have
deduced that this CPU passed through dyntick-idle mode. It is critically
important that quiescent state be counted only against the grace period
that was in effect at the time that the quiescent state was detected.
Previously, this was handled by recording the number of the last grace
period to complete when passing through a quiescent state. The RCU
core then checks this number against the current value, and rejects
the quiescent state if there is a mismatch. However, one additional
possibility must be accounted for, namely that the quiescent state was
recorded after the prior grace period completed but before the current
grace period started. In this case, the RCU core must reject the
quiescent state, but the recorded number will match. This is handled
when the CPU becomes aware of a new grace period -- at that point,
it invalidates any prior quiescent state.
This works, but is a bit indirect. The new approach records the current
grace period, and the RCU core checks to see (1) that this is still the
current grace period and (2) that this grace period has not yet ended.
This approach simplifies reasoning about correctness, and this commit
changes over to this new approach.
Signed-off-by: Paul E. McKenney <paul.mckenney@linaro.org>
Signed-off-by: Paul E. McKenney <paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
---
Documentation/RCU/trace.txt | 34 ++++++++++++++++----------------
kernel/rcutree.c | 44 +++++++++++++++++++++---------------------
kernel/rcutree.h | 6 ++--
kernel/rcutree_plugin.h | 6 ++--
kernel/rcutree_trace.c | 8 +++---
5 files changed, 49 insertions(+), 49 deletions(-)
diff --git a/Documentation/RCU/trace.txt b/Documentation/RCU/trace.txt
index a67af0a..aaf65f6 100644
--- a/Documentation/RCU/trace.txt
+++ b/Documentation/RCU/trace.txt
@@ -33,23 +33,23 @@ rcu/rcuboost:
The output of "cat rcu/rcudata" looks as follows:
rcu_sched:
- 0 c=20972 g=20973 pq=1 pqc=20972 qp=0 dt=545/1/0 df=50 of=0 ri=0 ql=163 qs=NRW. kt=0/W/0 ktl=ebc3 b=10 ci=153737 co=0 ca=0
- 1 c=20972 g=20973 pq=1 pqc=20972 qp=0 dt=967/1/0 df=58 of=0 ri=0 ql=634 qs=NRW. kt=0/W/1 ktl=58c b=10 ci=191037 co=0 ca=0
- 2 c=20972 g=20973 pq=1 pqc=20972 qp=0 dt=1081/1/0 df=175 of=0 ri=0 ql=74 qs=N.W. kt=0/W/2 ktl=da94 b=10 ci=75991 co=0 ca=0
- 3 c=20942 g=20943 pq=1 pqc=20942 qp=1 dt=1846/0/0 df=404 of=0 ri=0 ql=0 qs=.... kt=0/W/3 ktl=d1cd b=10 ci=72261 co=0 ca=0
- 4 c=20972 g=20973 pq=1 pqc=20972 qp=0 dt=369/1/0 df=83 of=0 ri=0 ql=48 qs=N.W. kt=0/W/4 ktl=e0e7 b=10 ci=128365 co=0 ca=0
- 5 c=20972 g=20973 pq=1 pqc=20972 qp=0 dt=381/1/0 df=64 of=0 ri=0 ql=169 qs=NRW. kt=0/W/5 ktl=fb2f b=10 ci=164360 co=0 ca=0
- 6 c=20972 g=20973 pq=1 pqc=20972 qp=0 dt=1037/1/0 df=183 of=0 ri=0 ql=62 qs=N.W. kt=0/W/6 ktl=d2ad b=10 ci=65663 co=0 ca=0
- 7 c=20897 g=20897 pq=1 pqc=20896 qp=0 dt=1572/0/0 df=382 of=0 ri=0 ql=0 qs=.... kt=0/W/7 ktl=cf15 b=10 ci=75006 co=0 ca=0
+ 0 c=20972 g=20973 pq=1 pgp=20973 qp=0 dt=545/1/0 df=50 of=0 ri=0 ql=163 qs=NRW. kt=0/W/0 ktl=ebc3 b=10 ci=153737 co=0 ca=0
+ 1 c=20972 g=20973 pq=1 pgp=20973 qp=0 dt=967/1/0 df=58 of=0 ri=0 ql=634 qs=NRW. kt=0/W/1 ktl=58c b=10 ci=191037 co=0 ca=0
+ 2 c=20972 g=20973 pq=1 pgp=20973 qp=0 dt=1081/1/0 df=175 of=0 ri=0 ql=74 qs=N.W. kt=0/W/2 ktl=da94 b=10 ci=75991 co=0 ca=0
+ 3 c=20942 g=20943 pq=1 pgp=20942 qp=1 dt=1846/0/0 df=404 of=0 ri=0 ql=0 qs=.... kt=0/W/3 ktl=d1cd b=10 ci=72261 co=0 ca=0
+ 4 c=20972 g=20973 pq=1 pgp=20973 qp=0 dt=369/1/0 df=83 of=0 ri=0 ql=48 qs=N.W. kt=0/W/4 ktl=e0e7 b=10 ci=128365 co=0 ca=0
+ 5 c=20972 g=20973 pq=1 pgp=20973 qp=0 dt=381/1/0 df=64 of=0 ri=0 ql=169 qs=NRW. kt=0/W/5 ktl=fb2f b=10 ci=164360 co=0 ca=0
+ 6 c=20972 g=20973 pq=1 pgp=20973 qp=0 dt=1037/1/0 df=183 of=0 ri=0 ql=62 qs=N.W. kt=0/W/6 ktl=d2ad b=10 ci=65663 co=0 ca=0
+ 7 c=20897 g=20897 pq=1 pgp=20896 qp=0 dt=1572/0/0 df=382 of=0 ri=0 ql=0 qs=.... kt=0/W/7 ktl=cf15 b=10 ci=75006 co=0 ca=0
rcu_bh:
- 0 c=1480 g=1480 pq=1 pqc=1479 qp=0 dt=545/1/0 df=6 of=0 ri=1 ql=0 qs=.... kt=0/W/0 ktl=ebc3 b=10 ci=0 co=0 ca=0
- 1 c=1480 g=1480 pq=1 pqc=1479 qp=0 dt=967/1/0 df=3 of=0 ri=1 ql=0 qs=.... kt=0/W/1 ktl=58c b=10 ci=151 co=0 ca=0
- 2 c=1480 g=1480 pq=1 pqc=1479 qp=0 dt=1081/1/0 df=6 of=0 ri=1 ql=0 qs=.... kt=0/W/2 ktl=da94 b=10 ci=0 co=0 ca=0
- 3 c=1480 g=1480 pq=1 pqc=1479 qp=0 dt=1846/0/0 df=8 of=0 ri=1 ql=0 qs=.... kt=0/W/3 ktl=d1cd b=10 ci=0 co=0 ca=0
- 4 c=1480 g=1480 pq=1 pqc=1479 qp=0 dt=369/1/0 df=6 of=0 ri=1 ql=0 qs=.... kt=0/W/4 ktl=e0e7 b=10 ci=0 co=0 ca=0
- 5 c=1480 g=1480 pq=1 pqc=1479 qp=0 dt=381/1/0 df=4 of=0 ri=1 ql=0 qs=.... kt=0/W/5 ktl=fb2f b=10 ci=0 co=0 ca=0
- 6 c=1480 g=1480 pq=1 pqc=1479 qp=0 dt=1037/1/0 df=6 of=0 ri=1 ql=0 qs=.... kt=0/W/6 ktl=d2ad b=10 ci=0 co=0 ca=0
- 7 c=1474 g=1474 pq=1 pqc=1473 qp=0 dt=1572/0/0 df=8 of=0 ri=1 ql=0 qs=.... kt=0/W/7 ktl=cf15 b=10 ci=0 co=0 ca=0
+ 0 c=1480 g=1480 pq=1 pgp=1480 qp=0 dt=545/1/0 df=6 of=0 ri=1 ql=0 qs=.... kt=0/W/0 ktl=ebc3 b=10 ci=0 co=0 ca=0
+ 1 c=1480 g=1480 pq=1 pgp=1480 qp=0 dt=967/1/0 df=3 of=0 ri=1 ql=0 qs=.... kt=0/W/1 ktl=58c b=10 ci=151 co=0 ca=0
+ 2 c=1480 g=1480 pq=1 pgp=1480 qp=0 dt=1081/1/0 df=6 of=0 ri=1 ql=0 qs=.... kt=0/W/2 ktl=da94 b=10 ci=0 co=0 ca=0
+ 3 c=1480 g=1480 pq=1 pgp=1480 qp=0 dt=1846/0/0 df=8 of=0 ri=1 ql=0 qs=.... kt=0/W/3 ktl=d1cd b=10 ci=0 co=0 ca=0
+ 4 c=1480 g=1480 pq=1 pgp=1480 qp=0 dt=369/1/0 df=6 of=0 ri=1 ql=0 qs=.... kt=0/W/4 ktl=e0e7 b=10 ci=0 co=0 ca=0
+ 5 c=1480 g=1480 pq=1 pgp=1480 qp=0 dt=381/1/0 df=4 of=0 ri=1 ql=0 qs=.... kt=0/W/5 ktl=fb2f b=10 ci=0 co=0 ca=0
+ 6 c=1480 g=1480 pq=1 pgp=1480 qp=0 dt=1037/1/0 df=6 of=0 ri=1 ql=0 qs=.... kt=0/W/6 ktl=d2ad b=10 ci=0 co=0 ca=0
+ 7 c=1474 g=1474 pq=1 pgp=1473 qp=0 dt=1572/0/0 df=8 of=0 ri=1 ql=0 qs=.... kt=0/W/7 ktl=cf15 b=10 ci=0 co=0 ca=0
The first section lists the rcu_data structures for rcu_sched, the second
for rcu_bh. Note that CONFIG_TREE_PREEMPT_RCU kernels will have an
@@ -84,7 +84,7 @@ o "pq" indicates that this CPU has passed through a quiescent state
CPU has not yet reported that fact, (2) some other CPU has not
yet reported for this grace period, or (3) both.
-o "pqc" indicates which grace period the last-observed quiescent
+o "pgp" indicates which grace period the last-observed quiescent
state for this CPU corresponds to. This is important for handling
the race between CPU 0 reporting an extended dynticks-idle
quiescent state for CPU 1 and CPU 1 suddenly waking up and
diff --git a/kernel/rcutree.c b/kernel/rcutree.c
index 7e02829..7e2f297 100644
--- a/kernel/rcutree.c
+++ b/kernel/rcutree.c
@@ -159,32 +159,34 @@ static int rcu_gp_in_progress(struct rcu_state *rsp)
* Note a quiescent state. Because we do not need to know
* how many quiescent states passed, just if there was at least
* one since the start of the grace period, this just sets a flag.
+ * The caller must have disabled preemption.
*/
void rcu_sched_qs(int cpu)
{
struct rcu_data *rdp = &per_cpu(rcu_sched_data, cpu);
- rdp->passed_quiesc_completed = rdp->gpnum - 1;
+ rdp->passed_quiesce_gpnum = rdp->gpnum;
barrier();
- if (rdp->passed_quiesc == 0)
+ if (rdp->passed_quiesce == 0)
trace_rcu_grace_period("rcu_sched", rdp->gpnum, "cpuqs");
- rdp->passed_quiesc = 1;
+ rdp->passed_quiesce = 1;
}
void rcu_bh_qs(int cpu)
{
struct rcu_data *rdp = &per_cpu(rcu_bh_data, cpu);
- rdp->passed_quiesc_completed = rdp->gpnum - 1;
+ rdp->passed_quiesce_gpnum = rdp->gpnum;
barrier();
- if (rdp->passed_quiesc == 0)
+ if (rdp->passed_quiesce == 0)
trace_rcu_grace_period("rcu_bh", rdp->gpnum, "cpuqs");
- rdp->passed_quiesc = 1;
+ rdp->passed_quiesce = 1;
}
/*
* Note a context switch. This is a quiescent state for RCU-sched,
* and requires special handling for preemptible RCU.
+ * The caller must have disabled preemption.
*/
void rcu_note_context_switch(int cpu)
{
@@ -694,7 +696,7 @@ static void __note_new_gpnum(struct rcu_state *rsp, struct rcu_node *rnp, struct
trace_rcu_grace_period(rsp->name, rdp->gpnum, "cpustart");
if (rnp->qsmask & rdp->grpmask) {
rdp->qs_pending = 1;
- rdp->passed_quiesc = 0;
+ rdp->passed_quiesce = 0;
} else
rdp->qs_pending = 0;
}
@@ -1027,7 +1029,7 @@ rcu_report_qs_rnp(unsigned long mask, struct rcu_state *rsp,
* based on quiescent states detected in an earlier grace period!
*/
static void
-rcu_report_qs_rdp(int cpu, struct rcu_state *rsp, struct rcu_data *rdp, long lastcomp)
+rcu_report_qs_rdp(int cpu, struct rcu_state *rsp, struct rcu_data *rdp, long lastgp)
{
unsigned long flags;
unsigned long mask;
@@ -1035,17 +1037,15 @@ rcu_report_qs_rdp(int cpu, struct rcu_state *rsp, struct rcu_data *rdp, long las
rnp = rdp->mynode;
raw_spin_lock_irqsave(&rnp->lock, flags);
- if (lastcomp != rnp->completed) {
+ if (lastgp != rnp->gpnum || rnp->completed == rnp->gpnum) {
/*
- * Someone beat us to it for this grace period, so leave.
- * The race with GP start is resolved by the fact that we
- * hold the leaf rcu_node lock, so that the per-CPU bits
- * cannot yet be initialized -- so we would simply find our
- * CPU's bit already cleared in rcu_report_qs_rnp() if this
- * race occurred.
+ * The grace period in which this quiescent state was
+ * recorded has ended, so don't report it upwards.
+ * We will instead need a new quiescent state that lies
+ * within the current grace period.
*/
- rdp->passed_quiesc = 0; /* try again later! */
+ rdp->passed_quiesce = 0; /* need qs for new gp. */
raw_spin_unlock_irqrestore(&rnp->lock, flags);
return;
}
@@ -1089,14 +1089,14 @@ rcu_check_quiescent_state(struct rcu_state *rsp, struct rcu_data *rdp)
* Was there a quiescent state since the beginning of the grace
* period? If no, then exit and wait for the next call.
*/
- if (!rdp->passed_quiesc)
+ if (!rdp->passed_quiesce)
return;
/*
* Tell RCU we are done (but rcu_report_qs_rdp() will be the
* judge of that).
*/
- rcu_report_qs_rdp(rdp->cpu, rsp, rdp, rdp->passed_quiesc_completed);
+ rcu_report_qs_rdp(rdp->cpu, rsp, rdp, rdp->passed_quiesce_gpnum);
}
#ifdef CONFIG_HOTPLUG_CPU
@@ -1712,7 +1712,7 @@ static int __rcu_pending(struct rcu_state *rsp, struct rcu_data *rdp)
check_cpu_stall(rsp, rdp);
/* Is the RCU core waiting for a quiescent state from this CPU? */
- if (rdp->qs_pending && !rdp->passed_quiesc) {
+ if (rdp->qs_pending && !rdp->passed_quiesce) {
/*
* If force_quiescent_state() coming soon and this CPU
@@ -1724,7 +1724,7 @@ static int __rcu_pending(struct rcu_state *rsp, struct rcu_data *rdp)
ULONG_CMP_LT(ACCESS_ONCE(rsp->jiffies_force_qs) - 1,
jiffies))
set_need_resched();
- } else if (rdp->qs_pending && rdp->passed_quiesc) {
+ } else if (rdp->qs_pending && rdp->passed_quiesce) {
rdp->n_rp_report_qs++;
return 1;
}
@@ -1907,7 +1907,7 @@ rcu_init_percpu_data(int cpu, struct rcu_state *rsp, int preemptible)
/* Set up local state, ensuring consistent view of global state. */
raw_spin_lock_irqsave(&rnp->lock, flags);
- rdp->passed_quiesc = 0; /* We could be racing with new GP, */
+ rdp->passed_quiesce = 0; /* We could be racing with new GP, */
rdp->qs_pending = 1; /* so set up to respond to current GP. */
rdp->beenonline = 1; /* We have now been online. */
rdp->preemptible = preemptible;
@@ -1935,7 +1935,7 @@ rcu_init_percpu_data(int cpu, struct rcu_state *rsp, int preemptible)
if (rnp == rdp->mynode) {
rdp->gpnum = rnp->completed; /* if GP in progress... */
rdp->completed = rnp->completed;
- rdp->passed_quiesc_completed = rnp->completed - 1;
+ rdp->passed_quiesce_gpnum = rnp->gpnum - 1;
trace_rcu_grace_period(rsp->name, rdp->gpnum, "cpuonl");
}
raw_spin_unlock(&rnp->lock); /* irqs already disabled. */
diff --git a/kernel/rcutree.h b/kernel/rcutree.h
index d11a006..51638b6 100644
--- a/kernel/rcutree.h
+++ b/kernel/rcutree.h
@@ -230,9 +230,9 @@ struct rcu_data {
/* in order to detect GP end. */
unsigned long gpnum; /* Highest gp number that this CPU */
/* is aware of having started. */
- unsigned long passed_quiesc_completed;
- /* Value of completed at time of qs. */
- bool passed_quiesc; /* User-mode/idle loop etc. */
+ unsigned long passed_quiesce_gpnum;
+ /* gpnum at time of quiescent state. */
+ bool passed_quiesce; /* User-mode/idle loop etc. */
bool qs_pending; /* Core waits for quiesc state. */
bool beenonline; /* CPU online at least once. */
bool preemptible; /* Preemptible RCU? */
diff --git a/kernel/rcutree_plugin.h b/kernel/rcutree_plugin.h
index bdb2e82..4bac5a2 100644
--- a/kernel/rcutree_plugin.h
+++ b/kernel/rcutree_plugin.h
@@ -122,11 +122,11 @@ static void rcu_preempt_qs(int cpu)
{
struct rcu_data *rdp = &per_cpu(rcu_preempt_data, cpu);
- rdp->passed_quiesc_completed = rdp->gpnum - 1;
+ rdp->passed_quiesce_gpnum = rdp->gpnum;
barrier();
- if (rdp->passed_quiesc == 0)
+ if (rdp->passed_quiesce == 0)
trace_rcu_grace_period("rcu_preempt", rdp->gpnum, "cpuqs");
- rdp->passed_quiesc = 1;
+ rdp->passed_quiesce = 1;
current->rcu_read_unlock_special &= ~RCU_READ_UNLOCK_NEED_QS;
}
diff --git a/kernel/rcutree_trace.c b/kernel/rcutree_trace.c
index e623564..3f739cf3 100644
--- a/kernel/rcutree_trace.c
+++ b/kernel/rcutree_trace.c
@@ -61,11 +61,11 @@ static void print_one_rcu_data(struct seq_file *m, struct rcu_data *rdp)
{
if (!rdp->beenonline)
return;
- seq_printf(m, "%3d%cc=%lu g=%lu pq=%d pqc=%lu qp=%d",
+ seq_printf(m, "%3d%cc=%lu g=%lu pq=%d pgp=%lu qp=%d",
rdp->cpu,
cpu_is_offline(rdp->cpu) ? '!' : ' ',
rdp->completed, rdp->gpnum,
- rdp->passed_quiesc, rdp->passed_quiesc_completed,
+ rdp->passed_quiesce, rdp->passed_quiesce_gpnum,
rdp->qs_pending);
#ifdef CONFIG_NO_HZ
seq_printf(m, " dt=%d/%d/%d df=%lu",
@@ -139,7 +139,7 @@ static void print_one_rcu_data_csv(struct seq_file *m, struct rcu_data *rdp)
rdp->cpu,
cpu_is_offline(rdp->cpu) ? "\"N\"" : "\"Y\"",
rdp->completed, rdp->gpnum,
- rdp->passed_quiesc, rdp->passed_quiesc_completed,
+ rdp->passed_quiesce, rdp->passed_quiesce_gpnum,
rdp->qs_pending);
#ifdef CONFIG_NO_HZ
seq_printf(m, ",%d,%d,%d,%lu",
@@ -170,7 +170,7 @@ static void print_one_rcu_data_csv(struct seq_file *m, struct rcu_data *rdp)
static int show_rcudata_csv(struct seq_file *m, void *unused)
{
- seq_puts(m, "\"CPU\",\"Online?\",\"c\",\"g\",\"pq\",\"pqc\",\"pq\",");
+ seq_puts(m, "\"CPU\",\"Online?\",\"c\",\"g\",\"pq\",\"pgp\",\"pq\",");
#ifdef CONFIG_NO_HZ
seq_puts(m, "\"dt\",\"dt nesting\",\"dt NMI nesting\",\"df\",");
#endif /* #ifdef CONFIG_NO_HZ */
--
1.7.3.2
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2011-09-07 6:22 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 98+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2011-09-06 18:00 [PATCH tip/core/rcu 0/55] Preview of RCU changes for 3.2 Paul E. McKenney
2011-09-06 17:59 ` [PATCH tip/core/rcu 01/55] rcu: Use kthread_create_on_node() Paul E. McKenney
2011-09-06 17:59 ` [PATCH tip/core/rcu 02/55] rcu: Avoid unnecessary self-wakeup of per-CPU kthreads Paul E. McKenney
2011-09-06 17:59 ` [PATCH tip/core/rcu 03/55] rcu: Update documentation to flag RCU_BOOST trace information Paul E. McKenney
2011-09-06 17:59 ` [PATCH tip/core/rcu 04/55] rcu: Restore checks for blocking in RCU read-side critical sections Paul E. McKenney
2011-09-06 17:59 ` [PATCH tip/core/rcu 05/55] rcu: Move rcu_head definition to types.h Paul E. McKenney
2011-09-07 18:31 ` Paul Gortmaker
2011-09-07 22:11 ` Paul E. McKenney
2011-09-06 18:00 ` [PATCH tip/core/rcu 06/55] rcu: Update rcutorture documentation Paul E. McKenney
2011-09-06 18:00 ` [PATCH tip/core/rcu 07/55] rcu: Fix mismatched variable in rcutree_trace.c Paul E. McKenney
2011-09-06 18:00 ` [PATCH tip/core/rcu 08/55] rcu: Abstract common code for RCU grace-period-wait primitives Paul E. McKenney
2011-09-06 18:00 ` [PATCH tip/core/rcu 09/55] rcu: Catch rcutorture up to new RCU API additions Paul E. McKenney
2011-09-06 18:00 ` [PATCH tip/core/rcu 10/55] rcu: Fix RCU's NMI documentation Paul E. McKenney
2011-09-06 18:00 ` [PATCH tip/core/rcu 11/55] rcu: Drive configuration directly from SMP and PREEMPT Paul E. McKenney
2011-09-06 18:00 ` [PATCH tip/core/rcu 12/55] rcu: Fix pathnames in documentation Paul E. McKenney
2011-09-06 18:00 ` [PATCH tip/core/rcu 13/55] rcu: Don't destroy rcu_torture_boost() callback until it is done Paul E. McKenney
2011-09-06 18:00 ` [PATCH tip/core/rcu 14/55] rcu: Add event-tracing for RCU callback invocation Paul E. McKenney
2011-09-06 18:00 ` [PATCH tip/core/rcu 15/55] rcu: Event-trace markers for computing RCU CPU utilization Paul E. McKenney
2011-09-06 18:00 ` [PATCH tip/core/rcu 16/55] rcu: Put names into TINY_RCU structures under RCU_TRACE Paul E. McKenney
2011-09-06 18:00 ` [PATCH tip/core/rcu 17/55] rcu: Add RCU type to callback-invocation tracing Paul E. McKenney
2011-09-06 18:00 ` [PATCH tip/core/rcu 18/55] rcu: Update comments to reflect softirqs vs. kthreads Paul E. McKenney
2011-09-06 18:00 ` [PATCH tip/core/rcu 19/55] rcu: Move RCU_BOOST declarations to allow compiler checking Paul E. McKenney
2011-09-06 18:00 ` [PATCH tip/core/rcu 20/55] rcu: Add event-trace markers to TREE_RCU kthreads Paul E. McKenney
2011-09-06 18:00 ` [PATCH tip/core/rcu 21/55] rcu: Make TINY_RCU also use softirq for RCU_BOOST=n Paul E. McKenney
2011-09-06 18:00 ` [PATCH tip/core/rcu 22/55] rcu: Add grace-period, quiescent-state, and call_rcu trace events Paul E. McKenney
2011-10-17 1:33 ` Josh Triplett
2011-10-24 12:02 ` Paul E. McKenney
2011-09-06 18:00 ` Paul E. McKenney [this message]
2011-09-06 18:00 ` [PATCH tip/core/rcu 24/55] rcu: Not necessary to pass rcu_read_lock_held() to rcu_dereference_protected() Paul E. McKenney
2011-09-06 18:00 ` [PATCH tip/core/rcu 25/55] rcu: Update documentation for additional RCU lockdep functions Paul E. McKenney
2011-09-06 18:00 ` [PATCH tip/core/rcu 26/55] rcu: Remove unused and redundant interfaces Paul E. McKenney
2011-09-06 18:00 ` [PATCH tip/core/rcu 27/55] rcu: Allow rcutorture's stat_interval parameter to be changed at runtime Paul E. McKenney
2011-09-06 18:00 ` [PATCH tip/core/rcu 28/55] rcu: Document interpretation of RCU-lockdep splats Paul E. McKenney
2011-09-06 18:00 ` [PATCH tip/core/rcu 29/55] nohz: Remove nohz_cpu_mask Paul E. McKenney
2011-09-06 18:00 ` [PATCH tip/core/rcu 30/55] rcu: Eliminate in_irq() checks in rcu_enter_nohz() Paul E. McKenney
2011-09-06 18:00 ` [PATCH tip/core/rcu 31/55] rcu: Make rcu_implicit_dynticks_qs() locals be correct size Paul E. McKenney
2011-10-17 1:43 ` Josh Triplett
2011-10-24 12:00 ` Paul E. McKenney
2011-09-06 18:00 ` [PATCH tip/core/rcu 32/55] rcu: Make rcu_assign_pointer() unconditionally insert a memory barrier Paul E. McKenney
2011-09-06 18:00 ` [PATCH tip/core/rcu 33/55] rcu: Improve rcu_assign_pointer() and RCU_INIT_POINTER() documentation Paul E. McKenney
2011-09-06 18:00 ` [PATCH tip/core/rcu 34/55] rcu: Move __rcu_read_unlock()'s barrier() within if-statement Paul E. McKenney
2011-09-06 18:00 ` [PATCH tip/core/rcu 35/55] rcu: Dump local stack if cannot dump all CPUs' stacks Paul E. McKenney
2011-09-06 18:00 ` [PATCH tip/core/rcu 36/55] rcu: Prevent early boot set_need_resched() from __rcu_pending() Paul E. McKenney
2011-10-17 1:49 ` Josh Triplett
2011-10-24 12:07 ` Paul E. McKenney
2011-09-06 18:00 ` [PATCH tip/core/rcu 37/55] rcu: Simplify unboosting checks Paul E. McKenney
2011-09-06 18:00 ` [PATCH tip/core/rcu 38/55] rcu: Prohibit grace periods during early boot Paul E. McKenney
2011-10-17 1:51 ` Josh Triplett
2011-09-06 18:00 ` [PATCH tip/core/rcu 39/55] rcu: Suppress NMI backtraces when stall ends before dump Paul E. McKenney
2011-09-06 18:00 ` [PATCH tip/core/rcu 40/55] rcu: Avoid having just-onlined CPU resched itself when RCU is idle Paul E. McKenney
2011-09-06 18:00 ` [PATCH tip/core/rcu 41/55] rcu: Permit rt_mutex_unlock() with irqs disabled Paul E. McKenney
2011-09-18 4:09 ` Yong Zhang
2011-09-19 4:14 ` Paul E. McKenney
2011-09-19 5:49 ` Yong Zhang
2011-09-20 14:57 ` Paul E. McKenney
2011-09-06 18:00 ` [PATCH tip/core/rcu 42/55] rcu: Make rcu_torture_fqs() exit loops at end of test Paul E. McKenney
2011-10-17 1:53 ` Josh Triplett
2011-10-24 12:10 ` Paul E. McKenney
2011-09-06 18:00 ` [PATCH tip/core/rcu 43/55] rcu: Make rcu_torture_boost() " Paul E. McKenney
2011-09-06 18:00 ` [PATCH tip/core/rcu 44/55] rcu: wire up RCU_BOOST_PRIO for rcutree Paul E. McKenney
2011-09-13 12:02 ` Mike Galbraith
2011-09-13 15:34 ` Paul E. McKenney
2011-09-13 16:04 ` Mike Galbraith
2011-09-13 20:50 ` Paul E. McKenney
2011-10-17 1:55 ` Josh Triplett
2011-09-06 18:00 ` [PATCH tip/core/rcu 45/55] rcu: check for entering dyntick-idle mode while in read-side critical section Paul E. McKenney
2011-09-06 18:00 ` [PATCH tip/core/rcu 46/55] rcu: Remove rcu_needs_cpu_flush() to avoid false quiescent states Paul E. McKenney
2011-09-06 18:00 ` [PATCH tip/core/rcu 47/55] rcu: Move propagation of ->completed from rcu_start_gp() to rcu_report_qs_rsp() Paul E. McKenney
2011-09-06 18:00 ` [PATCH tip/core/rcu 48/55] powerpc: strengthen value-returning-atomics memory barriers Paul E. McKenney
2011-09-09 17:23 ` Olof Johansson
2011-09-09 17:34 ` Paul E. McKenney
2011-09-09 18:43 ` Olof Johansson
2011-09-06 18:00 ` [PATCH tip/core/rcu 49/55] rcu: Detect illegal rcu dereference in extended quiescent state Paul E. McKenney
2011-09-06 18:00 ` [PATCH tip/core/rcu 50/55] rcu: Inform the user about dynticks-idle mode on PROVE_RCU warning Paul E. McKenney
2011-09-06 18:00 ` [PATCH tip/core/rcu 51/55] rcu: Warn when rcu_read_lock() is used in extended quiescent state Paul E. McKenney
2011-09-06 18:00 ` [PATCH tip/core/rcu 52/55] rcu: Remove one layer of abstraction from PROVE_RCU checking Paul E. McKenney
2011-09-06 18:00 ` [PATCH tip/core/rcu 53/55] rcu: Warn when srcu_read_lock() is used in an extended quiescent state Paul E. McKenney
2011-10-04 21:03 ` Frederic Weisbecker
2011-10-04 23:40 ` Paul E. McKenney
2011-10-04 23:42 ` Frederic Weisbecker
2011-09-06 18:00 ` [PATCH tip/core/rcu 54/55] rcu: Make srcu_read_lock_held() call common lockdep-enabled function Paul E. McKenney
2011-10-17 2:03 ` Josh Triplett
2011-10-24 12:34 ` Paul E. McKenney
2011-09-06 18:00 ` [PATCH tip/core/rcu 55/55] powerpc: Work around tracing from dyntick-idle mode Paul E. McKenney
2011-09-07 10:00 ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2011-09-07 13:44 ` Paul E. McKenney
2011-09-13 19:13 ` Frederic Weisbecker
2011-09-13 19:50 ` Paul E. McKenney
2011-09-13 20:49 ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2011-09-15 14:53 ` Frederic Weisbecker
2011-09-16 12:24 ` Frederic Weisbecker
2011-09-07 14:39 ` [PATCH tip/core/rcu 0/55] Preview of RCU changes for 3.2 Lin Ming
2011-09-08 17:41 ` Paul E. McKenney
2011-09-08 19:23 ` Thomas Gleixner
2011-09-08 20:48 ` Paul E. McKenney
2011-09-12 16:24 ` Paul E. McKenney
2011-10-17 2:06 ` Josh Triplett
2011-10-24 12:35 ` Paul E. McKenney
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1315332049-2604-23-git-send-email-paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
--to=paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
--cc=Valdis.Kletnieks@vt.edu \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=darren@dvhart.com \
--cc=dhowells@redhat.com \
--cc=dipankar@in.ibm.com \
--cc=eric.dumazet@gmail.com \
--cc=josh@joshtriplett.org \
--cc=laijs@cn.fujitsu.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mathieu.desnoyers@polymtl.ca \
--cc=mingo@elte.hu \
--cc=niv@us.ibm.com \
--cc=patches@linaro.org \
--cc=paul.mckenney@linaro.org \
--cc=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=rostedt@goodmis.org \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).