From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1754714Ab1IMOxM (ORCPT ); Tue, 13 Sep 2011 10:53:12 -0400 Received: from casper.infradead.org ([85.118.1.10]:38168 "EHLO casper.infradead.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1754346Ab1IMOxL convert rfc822-to-8bit (ORCPT ); Tue, 13 Sep 2011 10:53:11 -0400 Subject: Re: [PATCH 00/11 v5] cgroups: Task counter subsystem From: Peter Zijlstra To: Frederic Weisbecker Cc: Andrew Morton , LKML , Paul Menage , Li Zefan , Johannes Weiner , Aditya Kali , Oleg Nesterov , Kay Sievers , Tim Hockin , Tejun Heo , Containers Date: Tue, 13 Sep 2011 16:49:20 +0200 In-Reply-To: <20110913143749.GA23424@somewhere> References: <1315869091-18933-1-git-send-email-fweisbec@gmail.com> <1315924371.5977.16.camel@twins> <20110913143749.GA23424@somewhere> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8BIT X-Mailer: Evolution 3.0.3- Message-ID: <1315925360.5977.17.camel@twins> Mime-Version: 1.0 Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Tue, 2011-09-13 at 16:37 +0200, Frederic Weisbecker wrote: > Because cgroup_task_limit.c sounds way too much generic to be > self-explanatory. Uhm, why? That's exactly what it does, no? It limits the number of tasks.