From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1756859Ab1INPju (ORCPT ); Wed, 14 Sep 2011 11:39:50 -0400 Received: from casper.infradead.org ([85.118.1.10]:54685 "EHLO casper.infradead.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1753543Ab1INPjt convert rfc822-to-8bit (ORCPT ); Wed, 14 Sep 2011 11:39:49 -0400 Subject: Re: [RFC][PATCH 1/3] sched: Provide delayed wakeup list From: Peter Zijlstra To: Darren Hart Cc: Ingo Molnar , Thomas Gleixner , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Steven Rostedt , Manfred Spraul , David Miller , Eric Dumazet , Mike Galbraith , Michel Lespinasse Date: Wed, 14 Sep 2011 17:39:34 +0200 In-Reply-To: <4E70C9B3.5080503@linux.intel.com> References: <20110914133034.687048806@chello.nl> <20110914133750.739484417@chello.nl> <4E70C9B3.5080503@linux.intel.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8BIT X-Mailer: Evolution 3.0.3- Message-ID: <1316014774.5040.29.camel@twins> Mime-Version: 1.0 Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Wed, 2011-09-14 at 08:35 -0700, Darren Hart wrote: > Missing here is what the value of state should be when > calling wake_up_list. Depends on what all you want to wake up :-) Would a reference to the comment of try_to_wake_up() be good enough?