From: "Alex,Shi" <alex.shi@intel.com>
To: Christoph Lameter <christoph@lameter.com>
Cc: Christoph Lameter <cl@linux.com>,
"penberg@kernel.org" <penberg@kernel.org>,
"linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
"Huang, Ying" <ying.huang@intel.com>,
"Li, Shaohua" <shaohua.li@intel.com>,
"Chen, Tim C" <tim.c.chen@intel.com>,
"linux-mm@kvack.org" <linux-mm@kvack.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] slub Discard slab page only when node partials > minimum setting
Date: Thu, 15 Sep 2011 09:32:43 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1316050363.8425.483.camel@debian> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CALmdxiMuF6Q0W4ZdvhK5c4fQs8wUjcVGWYGWBjJi7WOfLYX=Gw@mail.gmail.com>
On Tue, 2011-09-13 at 23:04 +0800, Christoph Lameter wrote:
> Sorry to be that late with a response but my email setup is screwed
> up.
>
> I was more thinking about the number of slab pages in the partial
> caches rather than the size of the objects itself being an issue. I
> believe that was /sys/kernel/slab/*/cpu_partial.
>
> That setting could be tuned further before merging. An increase there
> causes additional memory to be caught in the partial list. But it
> reduces the node lock pressure further.
>
Yeah, I think so. The more cpu partial page, the quicker to getting
slabs. Maybe it's better to considerate the system memory size to set
them. Do you has some plan or suggestions on tunning?
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2011-09-15 1:26 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 18+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
[not found] <1315188460.31737.5.camel@debian>
[not found] ` <alpine.DEB.2.00.1109061914440.18646@router.home>
[not found] ` <1315357399.31737.49.camel@debian>
[not found] ` <alpine.DEB.2.00.1109062022100.20474@router.home>
[not found] ` <4E671E5C.7010405@cs.helsinki.fi>
[not found] ` <6E3BC7F7C9A4BF4286DD4C043110F30B5D00DA333C@shsmsx502.ccr.corp.intel.com>
[not found] ` <alpine.DEB.2.00.1109071003240.9406@router.home>
2011-09-08 0:43 ` [PATCH] slub Discard slab page only when node partials > minimum setting Alex,Shi
2011-09-08 1:34 ` Shaohua Li
2011-09-08 2:24 ` Alex,Shi
2011-09-15 5:40 ` Pekka Enberg
2011-09-15 6:03 ` Alex,Shi
2011-09-08 18:37 ` Christoph Lameter
2011-09-09 8:45 ` Alex,Shi
2011-09-11 11:41 ` Christoph Lameter
2011-09-13 8:29 ` Alex,Shi
[not found] ` <CALmdxiMuF6Q0W4ZdvhK5c4fQs8wUjcVGWYGWBjJi7WOfLYX=Gw@mail.gmail.com>
2011-09-15 1:32 ` Alex,Shi [this message]
[not found] ` <CALmdxiMrDNDvhAmi88-0-1KBdyTwExZPy3Fh9_5TxB+XhK7vjw@mail.gmail.com>
2011-09-15 2:00 ` Alex,Shi
[not found] ` <1316765880.4188.34.camel@debian>
[not found] ` <alpine.DEB.2.00.1109231500580.15559@router.home>
2011-09-29 9:53 ` Alex,Shi
2011-09-29 14:32 ` Christoph Lameter
2011-10-02 12:47 ` Shi, Alex
2011-10-03 15:21 ` Christoph Lameter
2011-10-09 6:28 ` Alex,Shi
2011-10-10 17:12 ` Christoph Lameter
[not found] ` <CAOJsxLFcvWXcXZGWUrwzAE2rA8SmObrWaeg6ZYV8RfDG=nNCiA@mail.gmail.com>
2011-09-15 6:16 ` Alex,Shi
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1316050363.8425.483.camel@debian \
--to=alex.shi@intel.com \
--cc=christoph@lameter.com \
--cc=cl@linux.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=penberg@kernel.org \
--cc=shaohua.li@intel.com \
--cc=tim.c.chen@intel.com \
--cc=ying.huang@intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).