From: Thomas Meyer <thomas@m3y3r.de>
To: Ian Kent <raven@themaw.net>
Cc: Al Viro <viro@ZenIV.linux.org.uk>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
dhowells@redhat.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Force same size of struct autofs_v5_packet on x86 and x86_64
Date: Sun, 18 Sep 2011 10:01:42 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1316332908.5814.22.camel@localhost.localdomain> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1316169496.8502.6.camel@perseus.themaw.net>
Am Freitag, den 16.09.2011, 18:38 +0800 schrieb Ian Kent:
> On Fri, 2011-09-16 at 11:19 +0100, Al Viro wrote:
> > On Fri, Sep 16, 2011 at 12:06:38PM +0200, Thomas Meyer wrote:
> > > autofs_v5_packet is 300 bytes on x86 and 304 bytes on x86_64.
> > > This difference is wrong and leads to a hang in systemd when running
> > > a x86 userspace on an x86_64 kernel.
> >
> > NAK.
> >
> > You are talking about the userland ABI. With existing users. Changing
> > it might help systemd (what the hell is it doing with autofs, anyway?),
> > but breaking existing binaries (you know, ones that *do* have some business
> > dealing with autofs) is not acceptable.
>
> That's right.
>
> Certainly my mistake (made a long time ago) and when I realized it I
> decided I would need to handle it in user space for the same reasons Al
> has mentioned.
>
btw. where are the padding bytes are added? how to tell gcc to display
this?
with kind regards
thomas
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2011-09-18 8:01 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2011-09-16 10:06 [PATCH] Force same size of struct autofs_v5_packet on x86 and x86_64 Thomas Meyer
2011-09-16 10:19 ` Al Viro
2011-09-16 10:38 ` Ian Kent
2011-09-18 8:01 ` Thomas Meyer [this message]
2011-09-19 3:52 ` Ian Kent
2011-09-19 6:10 ` Al Viro
2011-09-19 9:30 ` Thomas Meyer
2011-09-19 15:27 ` Al Viro
2011-09-20 3:07 ` Ian Kent
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1316332908.5814.22.camel@localhost.localdomain \
--to=thomas@m3y3r.de \
--cc=dhowells@redhat.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=raven@themaw.net \
--cc=viro@ZenIV.linux.org.uk \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox