linux-kernel.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Lin Ming <ming.m.lin@intel.com>
To: Rakib Mullick <rakib.mullick@gmail.com>
Cc: "linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	"Brown, Len" <len.brown@intel.com>,
	Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
	"linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org" <linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org>,
	"Moore, Robert" <robert.moore@intel.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] acpi: Fix possible recursive locking in hwregs.c
Date: Thu, 22 Sep 2011 12:28:07 +0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <1316665687.9107.10.camel@minggr> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CADZ9YHhk0idJ6DQOfGmHJtY2RrHyk=D_m-wcOgN1rPp7_ommBg@mail.gmail.com>

On Thu, 2011-09-22 at 11:35 +0800, Rakib Mullick wrote:
> On Thu, Sep 22, 2011 at 6:59 AM, Lin Ming <ming.m.lin@intel.com> wrote:
> > On Thu, Sep 22, 2011 at 2:09 AM, Rakib Mullick <rakib.mullick@gmail.com> wrote:
> >> Calling pm-suspend might trigger a recursive lock in it's code path. In function acpi_hw_clear_acpi_status,
> >> acpi_os_release_lock holds the lock acpi_gbl_hardware_lock before calling acpi_hw_register_write(), then
> >> without releasing acpi_gbl_hardware_lock, this function calls acpi_ev_walk_gpe_list, which also tries to
> >> hold acpi_gbl_hardware_lock and thus causes possible recursive lock.
> >
> > No, acpi_ev_walk_gpe_list holds acpi_gbl_gpe_lock.
> >
> Yes, right. Actually, acpi_os_release_lock() tries to hold
> acpi_gbl_gpe_lock without releasing acpi_gbl_hardware_lock. Right?

Do you mean "acpi_ev_walk_gpe_list() tries to hold
acpi_gbl_gpe_lock..."?

We have below locks sequence. I don't see the problem.

acpi_hw_clear_acpi_status:

     <acquire acpi_gbl_hardware_lock>

         acpi_ev_walk_gpe_list:
             <acquire acpi_gbl_gpe_lock>
             ...
             <release acpi_gbl_gpe_lock>
         ...
     <release acpi_gbl_hardware_lock>

> 
> Thanks,
> Rakib



  reply	other threads:[~2011-09-22  4:28 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2011-09-21 18:09 [PATCH] acpi: Fix possible recursive locking in hwregs.c Rakib Mullick
2011-09-22  0:59 ` Lin Ming
2011-09-22  3:35   ` Rakib Mullick
2011-09-22  4:28     ` Lin Ming [this message]
2011-09-22  5:14       ` Rakib Mullick

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=1316665687.9107.10.camel@minggr \
    --to=ming.m.lin@intel.com \
    --cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=len.brown@intel.com \
    --cc=linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=rakib.mullick@gmail.com \
    --cc=robert.moore@intel.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).