From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1752068Ab1IWTzs (ORCPT ); Fri, 23 Sep 2011 15:55:48 -0400 Received: from casper.infradead.org ([85.118.1.10]:39014 "EHLO casper.infradead.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751402Ab1IWTzr convert rfc822-to-8bit (ORCPT ); Fri, 23 Sep 2011 15:55:47 -0400 Subject: Re: [RFC] Introduce greedy hrtimer walk on idle From: Peter Zijlstra To: Venkatesh Pallipadi Cc: Thomas Gleixner , Ingo Molnar , Arjan van de Ven , Suresh Siddha , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Date: Fri, 23 Sep 2011 21:55:18 +0200 In-Reply-To: <1316804080-6396-1-git-send-email-venki@google.com> References: <1316804080-6396-1-git-send-email-venki@google.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8BIT X-Mailer: Evolution 3.0.3- Message-ID: <1316807718.9084.48.camel@twins> Mime-Version: 1.0 Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Fri, 2011-09-23 at 11:54 -0700, Venkatesh Pallipadi wrote: > Comments? One of the reasons we didn't do it before was added cost to hrtimer_{add,del}, did you measure workloads that are heavy on that?