public inbox for linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
* [PATCH] ACPI: check mutex release status
@ 2011-09-26 11:39 Davidlohr Bueso
  2011-09-26 12:59 ` Lin Ming
  0 siblings, 1 reply; 2+ messages in thread
From: Davidlohr Bueso @ 2011-09-26 11:39 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Len Brown; +Cc: lkml, linux-acpi

From: Davidlohr Bueso <dave@gnu.org>

If this is not done we have a bogus ACPI_FAILURE() call.

Signed-off-by: Davidlohr Bueso <dave@gnu.org>
---
 drivers/acpi/acpica/nsload.c |    2 +-
 1 files changed, 1 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/acpi/acpica/nsload.c b/drivers/acpi/acpica/nsload.c
index 5f7dc69..f3070fd 100644
--- a/drivers/acpi/acpica/nsload.c
+++ b/drivers/acpi/acpica/nsload.c
@@ -115,7 +115,7 @@ acpi_ns_load_table(u32 table_index, struct acpi_namespace_node *node)
 	}
 
       unlock:
-	(void)acpi_ut_release_mutex(ACPI_MTX_NAMESPACE);
+	status = acpi_ut_release_mutex(ACPI_MTX_NAMESPACE);
 
 	if (ACPI_FAILURE(status)) {
 		return_ACPI_STATUS(status);
-- 
1.7.4.1




^ permalink raw reply related	[flat|nested] 2+ messages in thread

* Re: [PATCH] ACPI: check mutex release status
  2011-09-26 11:39 [PATCH] ACPI: check mutex release status Davidlohr Bueso
@ 2011-09-26 12:59 ` Lin Ming
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 2+ messages in thread
From: Lin Ming @ 2011-09-26 12:59 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: dave; +Cc: Len Brown, lkml, linux-acpi

On Mon, Sep 26, 2011 at 7:39 PM, Davidlohr Bueso <dave@gnu.org> wrote:
> From: Davidlohr Bueso <dave@gnu.org>
>
> If this is not done we have a bogus ACPI_FAILURE() call.
>
> Signed-off-by: Davidlohr Bueso <dave@gnu.org>
> ---
>  drivers/acpi/acpica/nsload.c |    2 +-
>  1 files changed, 1 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/acpi/acpica/nsload.c b/drivers/acpi/acpica/nsload.c
> index 5f7dc69..f3070fd 100644
> --- a/drivers/acpi/acpica/nsload.c
> +++ b/drivers/acpi/acpica/nsload.c
> @@ -115,7 +115,7 @@ acpi_ns_load_table(u32 table_index, struct acpi_namespace_node *node)
>        }
>
>       unlock:
> -       (void)acpi_ut_release_mutex(ACPI_MTX_NAMESPACE);
> +       status = acpi_ut_release_mutex(ACPI_MTX_NAMESPACE);

No,

The status maybe set before the "goto unlock" statement.

Lin Ming

>
>        if (ACPI_FAILURE(status)) {
>                return_ACPI_STATUS(status);
> --
> 1.7.4.1

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 2+ messages in thread

end of thread, other threads:[~2011-09-26 12:59 UTC | newest]

Thread overview: 2+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2011-09-26 11:39 [PATCH] ACPI: check mutex release status Davidlohr Bueso
2011-09-26 12:59 ` Lin Ming

This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox