public inbox for linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
To: John Stultz <john.stultz@linaro.org>
Cc: lkml <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	"Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@sisk.pl>,
	arve@android.com, markgross@thegnar.org,
	Alan Stern <stern@rowland.harvard.edu>,
	amit.kucheria@linaro.org, farrowg@sg.ibm.com,
	"Dmitry Fink (Palm GBU)" <Dmitry.Fink@palm.com>,
	linux-pm@lists.linux-foundation.org, khilman@ti.com,
	Magnus Damm <damm@opensource.se>,
	mjg@redhat.com, Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/6] [RFC] Proposal for optimistic suspend idea.
Date: Mon, 26 Sep 2011 22:16:04 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <1317068164.1763.39.camel@twins> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1317064434-1829-1-git-send-email-john.stultz@linaro.org>

On Mon, 2011-09-26 at 12:13 -0700, John Stultz wrote:
> 
> For now, I'd just be interested in what folks think about the concept with
> regards to the wakelock discussions. Where it might not be sufficient? Or
> what other disadvantages might it have? Are there any varients to this
> idea that would be better? 

I would like to know why people still think wakelocks are remotely sane?

>From where I'm sitting they're utter crap.. _WHY_ do you need to suspend
anything? What's wrong with regular idle?

So no, you've got a massive major NAK for anything touching the
scheduler for this utter braindamage.

  parent reply	other threads:[~2011-09-26 20:17 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 28+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2011-09-26 19:13 [PATCH 0/6] [RFC] Proposal for optimistic suspend idea John Stultz
2011-09-26 19:13 ` [PATCH 1/6] [RFC] suspend: Block suspend when wakeups are in-progress John Stultz
2011-09-26 19:13 ` [PATCH 2/6] [RFC] sched: Add support for SCHED_STAYAWAKE flag John Stultz
2011-09-26 19:13 ` [PATCH 3/6] [RFC] rtc: rtc-cmos: Add pm_stay_awake/pm_relax calls around IRQ John Stultz
2011-10-01 21:31   ` NeilBrown
2011-09-26 19:13 ` [PATCH 4/6] [RFC] rtc: interface: Add pm_stay_awake/pm_relax chaining rtc workqueue processing John Stultz
2011-09-26 19:13 ` [PATCH 5/6] [RFC] alarmtimer: Add pm_stay_awake /pm_relax calls John Stultz
2011-09-26 19:13 ` [PATCH 6/6] [RFC] alarmtimer: Deboost on nanosleep John Stultz
2011-09-26 20:16 ` Peter Zijlstra [this message]
2011-09-26 22:27   ` [PATCH 0/6] [RFC] Proposal for optimistic suspend idea John Stultz
2011-09-27 10:37     ` Peter Zijlstra
2011-09-27 22:56       ` John Stultz
2011-09-28  7:51         ` Peter Zijlstra
2011-09-28  7:57           ` Richard Cochran
2011-09-28  8:02             ` Peter Zijlstra
2011-09-28  8:19         ` Peter Zijlstra
2011-09-29  3:07           ` John Stultz
2011-09-28  8:19         ` Peter Zijlstra
2011-09-29  3:27           ` John Stultz
2011-09-28  8:40         ` Peter Zijlstra
2011-09-28  8:59         ` Peter Zijlstra
2011-09-29  3:45           ` John Stultz
2011-09-28  9:16         ` Peter Zijlstra
2011-09-28 10:45           ` Borislav Petkov
2011-09-28 21:02         ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2011-09-28  0:09     ` Thomas Gleixner
2011-09-28  1:19       ` John Stultz
2011-09-28  8:18         ` Thomas Gleixner

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=1317068164.1763.39.camel@twins \
    --to=peterz@infradead.org \
    --cc=Dmitry.Fink@palm.com \
    --cc=amit.kucheria@linaro.org \
    --cc=arve@android.com \
    --cc=damm@opensource.se \
    --cc=farrowg@sg.ibm.com \
    --cc=john.stultz@linaro.org \
    --cc=khilman@ti.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-pm@lists.linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=markgross@thegnar.org \
    --cc=mjg@redhat.com \
    --cc=rjw@sisk.pl \
    --cc=stern@rowland.harvard.edu \
    --cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox