From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1756359Ab1JALgz (ORCPT ); Sat, 1 Oct 2011 07:36:55 -0400 Received: from mail-bw0-f46.google.com ([209.85.214.46]:34720 "EHLO mail-bw0-f46.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751375Ab1JALgr (ORCPT ); Sat, 1 Oct 2011 07:36:47 -0400 Subject: Re: [PATCH] jffs2/security.c: local functions should be static From: Artem Bityutskiy Reply-To: dedekind1@gmail.com To: H Hartley Sweeten Cc: Linux Kernel , dwmw2@infradead.org, linux-mtd Date: Sat, 01 Oct 2011 14:39:47 +0300 In-Reply-To: <201109231556.15973.hartleys@visionengravers.com> References: <201109231556.15973.hartleys@visionengravers.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" X-Mailer: Evolution 3.0.3 (3.0.3-1.fc15) Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-ID: <1317469194.19426.86.camel@sauron> Mime-Version: 1.0 Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Fri, 2011-09-23 at 15:56 -0700, H Hartley Sweeten wrote: > Quiets the sparse noise: > > warning: symbol 'jffs2_initxattrs' was not declared. Should it be static? > > Signed-off-by: H Hartley Sweeten > Cc: David Woodhouse Against which tree is this patch? My l2-mtd-2.6 tree does not have this function, and it is based on Linux 3.1-rc2. -- Best Regards, Artem Bityutskiy