From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1755085Ab1JCKFc (ORCPT ); Mon, 3 Oct 2011 06:05:32 -0400 Received: from merlin.infradead.org ([205.233.59.134]:35874 "EHLO merlin.infradead.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1754845Ab1JCKFO convert rfc822-to-8bit (ORCPT ); Mon, 3 Oct 2011 06:05:14 -0400 Subject: Re: [PATCH] CPU hotplug, freezer: Fix bugs in CPU hotplug call path From: Peter Zijlstra To: "Srivatsa S. Bhat" Cc: "Rafael J. Wysocki" , pavel@ucw.cz, len.brown@intel.com, mingo@elte.hu, akpm@linux-foundation.org, suresh.b.siddha@intel.com, lucas.demarchi@profusion.mobi, linux-pm@lists.linux-foundation.org, rusty@rustcorp.com.au, vatsa@linux.vnet.ibm.com, ashok.raj@intel.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org In-Reply-To: <4E88BF33.10407@linux.vnet.ibm.com> References: <4E88BF33.10407@linux.vnet.ibm.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8BIT Date: Mon, 03 Oct 2011 12:03:35 +0200 Message-ID: <1317636215.12973.16.camel@twins> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Evolution 3.0.3- Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Mon, 2011-10-03 at 01:14 +0530, Srivatsa S. Bhat wrote: > +static atomic_t tasks_frozen = ATOMIC_INIT(0); > + > +void set_tasks_frozen_flag(void) > +{ > + atomic_set(&tasks_frozen, 1); > +} > + > +void clear_tasks_frozen_flag(void) > +{ > + atomic_set(&tasks_frozen, 0); > +} > + > +int tasks_are_frozen(void) > +{ > + int ret; > + ret = atomic_read(&tasks_frozen); > + return ret; > +} What's the point of using atomic_t here? Neither set nor read are actually atomic ops.