public inbox for linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Mathieu Desnoyers <mathieu.desnoyers@efficios.com>
To: Jonathan Corbet <corbet@lwn.net>, linux-man <linux-man@vger.kernel.org>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>,
	linux-kernel <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
	paulmck <paulmck@kernel.org>, Boqun Feng <boqun.feng@gmail.com>,
	"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@zytor.com>, Paul Turner <pjt@google.com>,
	linux-api <linux-api@vger.kernel.org>,
	Christian Brauner <christian.brauner@ubuntu.com>,
	Florian Weimer <fw@deneb.enyo.de>,
	David Laight <David.Laight@ACULAB.COM>,
	carlos <carlos@redhat.com>, Peter Oskolkov <posk@posk.io>
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH v2 09/11] sched: Introduce per memory space current virtual cpu id
Date: Fri, 25 Feb 2022 13:39:20 -0500 (EST)	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <1317699329.108531.1645814360159.JavaMail.zimbra@efficios.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <8735k6ke34.fsf@meer.lwn.net>

----- On Feb 25, 2022, at 1:15 PM, Jonathan Corbet corbet@lwn.net wrote:

> Mathieu Desnoyers <mathieu.desnoyers@efficios.com> writes:
> 
>> Some effective upper bounds for the number of vcpu ids observable in a process:
>>
>> - sysconf(3) _SC_NPROCESSORS_CONF,
>> - the number of threads which exist concurrently in the process,
>> - the number of cpus in the cpu affinity mask applied by sched_setaffinity,
>>   except in corner-case situations such as cpu hotplug removing all cpus from
>>   the affinity set,
>> - cgroup cpuset "partition" limits,
>>
>> Note that AFAIR non-partition cgroup cpusets allow a cgroup to "borrow"
>> additional cores from the rest of the system if they are idle, therefore
>> allowing the number of concurrent threads to go beyond the specified limit.
>>
>> AFAIR the sched affinity mask is tweaked independently of the cgroup cpuset.
>> Those are two mechanisms both affecting the scheduler task placement.
>>
>> I would expect the user-space code to use some sensible upper bound as a
>> hint about how many per-vcpu data structure elements to expect (and how many
>> to pre-allocate), but have a "lazy initialization" fall-back in case the
>> vcpu id goes up to the number of configured processors - 1. And I suspect
>> that even the number of configured processors may change with CRIU.
>>
>> If the above explanation makes sense (please let me know if I am wrong
>> or missed something), I suspect I should add it to the commit message.
> 
> That helps, thanks.  I do think that something like this belongs in the
> changelog - or, even better, in the upcoming restartable-sequences
> section in the userspace-api documentation :)

Just to confirm, when you say "userspace-api documentation" do you refer to
man pages ?

I did a few attempts at upstreaming a rseq.2 man page in 2020, but I have been
stuck waiting for feedback from Michael Kerrisk since then.

So for the moment I'm maintaining a rseq.2 man page here:

https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/libs/librseq/librseq.git/tree/doc/man/rseq.2

I'd gladly accept some help to improve the documentation of rseq.

Thanks,

Mathieu

> 
> Thanks,
> 
> jon

-- 
Mathieu Desnoyers
EfficiOS Inc.
http://www.efficios.com

  reply	other threads:[~2022-02-25 18:39 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 19+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2022-02-18 21:06 [RFC PATCH v2 00/11] RSEQ node id and virtual cpu id extensions Mathieu Desnoyers
2022-02-18 21:06 ` [RFC PATCH v2 01/11] rseq: Introduce feature size and alignment ELF auxiliary vector entries Mathieu Desnoyers
2022-02-18 21:06 ` [RFC PATCH v2 02/11] rseq: Introduce extensible rseq ABI Mathieu Desnoyers
2022-02-18 21:06 ` [RFC PATCH v2 03/11] rseq: extend struct rseq with numa node id Mathieu Desnoyers
2022-02-18 21:06 ` [RFC PATCH v2 04/11] selftests/rseq: Use ELF auxiliary vector for extensible rseq Mathieu Desnoyers
2022-02-18 21:06 ` [RFC PATCH v2 05/11] selftests/rseq: Implement rseq numa node id field selftest Mathieu Desnoyers
2022-02-18 21:06 ` [RFC PATCH v2 06/11] lib: invert _find_next_bit source arguments Mathieu Desnoyers
2022-02-18 21:06 ` [RFC PATCH v2 07/11] lib: implement find_{first,next}_{zero,one}_and_zero_bit Mathieu Desnoyers
2022-02-18 21:06 ` [RFC PATCH v2 08/11] cpumask: implement cpumask_{first,next}_{zero,one}_and_zero Mathieu Desnoyers
2022-02-18 21:06 ` [RFC PATCH v2 09/11] sched: Introduce per memory space current virtual cpu id Mathieu Desnoyers
2022-02-21 17:38   ` [RFC PATCH v3 " Mathieu Desnoyers
2022-02-25 17:35   ` [RFC PATCH v2 " Jonathan Corbet
2022-02-25 17:56     ` Mathieu Desnoyers
2022-02-25 18:15       ` Jonathan Corbet
2022-02-25 18:39         ` Mathieu Desnoyers [this message]
2022-02-25 19:24           ` Jonathan Corbet
2022-02-25 21:21       ` Mathieu Desnoyers
2022-02-18 21:06 ` [RFC PATCH v2 10/11] rseq: extend struct rseq with per memory space vcpu id Mathieu Desnoyers
2022-02-18 21:06 ` [RFC PATCH v2 11/11] selftests/rseq: Implement rseq vm_vcpu_id field support Mathieu Desnoyers

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=1317699329.108531.1645814360159.JavaMail.zimbra@efficios.com \
    --to=mathieu.desnoyers@efficios.com \
    --cc=David.Laight@ACULAB.COM \
    --cc=boqun.feng@gmail.com \
    --cc=carlos@redhat.com \
    --cc=christian.brauner@ubuntu.com \
    --cc=corbet@lwn.net \
    --cc=fw@deneb.enyo.de \
    --cc=hpa@zytor.com \
    --cc=linux-api@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-man@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=paulmck@kernel.org \
    --cc=peterz@infradead.org \
    --cc=pjt@google.com \
    --cc=posk@posk.io \
    --cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox