From: Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl>
To: "Srivatsa S. Bhat" <srivatsa.bhat@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Cc: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@sisk.pl>,
pavel@ucw.cz, len.brown@intel.com, mingo@elte.hu,
akpm@linux-foundation.org, suresh.b.siddha@intel.com,
lucas.demarchi@profusion.mobi,
linux-pm@lists.linux-foundation.org, rusty@rustcorp.com.au,
vatsa@linux.vnet.ibm.com, ashok.raj@intel.com,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] CPU hotplug, freezer: Fix bugs in CPU hotplug call path
Date: Tue, 04 Oct 2011 15:37:20 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1317735440.32543.4.camel@twins> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <4E8B09F3.4080800@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
On Tue, 2011-10-04 at 18:58 +0530, Srivatsa S. Bhat wrote:
> +static int tasks_frozen;
> +
> +void set_tasks_frozen_flag(void)
> +{
> + tasks_frozen = 1;
> + smp_mb();
> +}
> +
> +void clear_tasks_frozen_flag(void)
> +{
> + tasks_frozen = 0;
> + smp_mb();
> +}
> +
> +int tasks_are_frozen(void)
> +{
> + return tasks_frozen;
> +}
See Documentation/memory-barriers.txt, memory barriers always come in
pairs, furthermore memory barriers always should have a comment
explaining the ordering and referring to the pair match.
I think you want at least an smp_rmb() before reading tasks_frozen,
possible you also want to use ACCESS_ONCE() to force the compiler to
emit the read.
Furthermore, do you really need this? isn't it both set and read from
the same task context, all under pm_mutex?
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2011-10-04 13:38 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2011-10-02 19:44 [PATCH] CPU hotplug, freezer: Fix bugs in CPU hotplug call path Srivatsa S. Bhat
2011-10-03 10:03 ` Peter Zijlstra
2011-10-04 13:19 ` Srivatsa S. Bhat
2011-10-04 13:28 ` [PATCH v2] " Srivatsa S. Bhat
2011-10-04 13:37 ` Peter Zijlstra [this message]
2011-10-07 20:56 ` Srivatsa S. Bhat
2011-10-08 12:52 ` Américo Wang
2011-10-08 20:28 ` Srivatsa S. Bhat
2011-10-10 10:48 ` Peter Zijlstra
2011-10-21 11:30 ` Srivatsa S. Bhat
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1317735440.32543.4.camel@twins \
--to=a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=ashok.raj@intel.com \
--cc=len.brown@intel.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-pm@lists.linux-foundation.org \
--cc=lucas.demarchi@profusion.mobi \
--cc=mingo@elte.hu \
--cc=pavel@ucw.cz \
--cc=rjw@sisk.pl \
--cc=rusty@rustcorp.com.au \
--cc=srivatsa.bhat@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
--cc=suresh.b.siddha@intel.com \
--cc=vatsa@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox