From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1758081Ab1JEPfI (ORCPT ); Wed, 5 Oct 2011 11:35:08 -0400 Received: from merlin.infradead.org ([205.233.59.134]:34040 "EHLO merlin.infradead.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1757962Ab1JEPfG convert rfc822-to-8bit (ORCPT ); Wed, 5 Oct 2011 11:35:06 -0400 Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 8/9] KVM, VMX: Add support for guest/host-only profiling From: Peter Zijlstra To: Gleb Natapov Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, avi@redhat.com, kvm@vger.kernel.org, joerg.roedel@amd.com, mingo@elte.hu, Frederic Weisbecker Date: Wed, 05 Oct 2011 17:34:49 +0200 In-Reply-To: <20111005152954.GL30105@redhat.com> References: <1317816084-18026-1-git-send-email-gleb@redhat.com> <1317816084-18026-9-git-send-email-gleb@redhat.com> <1317824379.6766.30.camel@twins> <20111005152954.GL30105@redhat.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8BIT X-Mailer: Evolution 3.0.3- Message-ID: <1317828889.6766.38.camel@twins> Mime-Version: 1.0 Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Wed, 2011-10-05 at 17:29 +0200, Gleb Natapov wrote: > On Wed, Oct 05, 2011 at 04:19:39PM +0200, Peter Zijlstra wrote: > > On Wed, 2011-10-05 at 14:01 +0200, Gleb Natapov wrote: > > > +static void atomic_switch_perf_msrs(struct vcpu_vmx *vmx) > > > +{ > > > + int i, nr_msrs; > > > + struct perf_guest_switch_msr *msrs; > > > + > > > + msrs = perf_guest_get_msrs(&nr_msrs); > > > + > > > + if (!msrs) > > > + return; > > > + > > > + for (i = 0; i < nr_msrs; i++) > > > + if (msrs[i].host == msrs[i].guest) > > > + clear_atomic_switch_msr(vmx, msrs[i].msr); > > > + else > > > + add_atomic_switch_msr(vmx, msrs[i].msr, msrs[i].guest, > > > + msrs[i].host); > > > +} > > > > I don't think this will actually compile with PERF_EVENTS=n due to > > struct perf_guest_switch_msr not being defined. > Oops you are right. Turns out it is not enough to remove PERF_EVENTS > from .config to disable it. It re-appears after "make oldconfig". Should > I send incremental patch to fix that? Frederic, what's the status of being able to disable PERF on x86 again?