linux-kernel.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Stephane Eranian <eranian@google.com>
To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Cc: peterz@infradead.org, mingo@elte.hu, acme@redhat.com,
	ming.m.lin@intel.com, andi@firstfloor.org,
	robert.richter@amd.com, ravitillo@lbl.gov
Subject: [PATCH 05/12] perf_events: add LBR mappings for PERF_SAMPLE_BRANCH filters
Date: Thu,  6 Oct 2011 16:49:08 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <1317912555-9559-6-git-send-email-eranian@google.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1317912555-9559-1-git-send-email-eranian@google.com>

This patch adds the mappings from the generic PERF_SAMPLE_BRANCH_*
filters to the actual Intel X86 LBR filters, whenever they exist.

The patch also adds a restriction on Intel Atom, whereby only
stepping 10 (PineView) and more recent are supported. Older models,
do not have a functional LBR (does not freeze on PMU interrupt).

Signed-off-by: Stephane Eranian <eranian@google.com>
---
 arch/x86/kernel/cpu/perf_event_intel.c     |    2 +-
 arch/x86/kernel/cpu/perf_event_intel_lbr.c |  110 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++-
 2 files changed, 109 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)

diff --git a/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/perf_event_intel.c b/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/perf_event_intel.c
index e2639f4..740857f 100644
--- a/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/perf_event_intel.c
+++ b/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/perf_event_intel.c
@@ -1612,7 +1612,7 @@ static __init int intel_pmu_init(void)
 		memcpy(hw_cache_event_ids, snb_hw_cache_event_ids,
 		       sizeof(hw_cache_event_ids));
 
-		intel_pmu_lbr_init_nhm();
+		intel_pmu_lbr_init_snb();
 
 		x86_pmu.event_constraints = intel_snb_event_constraints;
 		x86_pmu.pebs_constraints = intel_snb_pebs_events;
diff --git a/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/perf_event_intel_lbr.c b/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/perf_event_intel_lbr.c
index e8a6851..abcabe3 100644
--- a/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/perf_event_intel_lbr.c
+++ b/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/perf_event_intel_lbr.c
@@ -8,6 +8,47 @@ enum {
 };
 
 /*
+ * Intel LBR_SELECT bits
+ * Intel Vol3a, April 2011, Section 16.7 Table 16-10
+ *
+ * Hardware branch filter (not available on all CPUs)
+ */
+#define LBR_KERNEL_BIT		0 /* do not capture at ring0 */
+#define LBR_USER_BIT		1 /* do not capture at ring > 0 */
+#define LBR_JCC_BIT		2 /* do not capture conditional branches */
+#define LBR_REL_CALL_BIT	3 /* do not capture relative calls */
+#define LBR_IND_CALL_BIT	4 /* do not capture indirect calls */
+#define LBR_RETURN_BIT		5 /* do not capture near returns */
+#define LBR_IND_JMP_BIT		6 /* do not capture indirect jumps */
+#define LBR_REL_JMP_BIT		7 /* do not capture relative jumps */
+#define LBR_FAR_BIT		8 /* do not capture far branches */
+
+#define LBR_KERNEL	(1 << LBR_KERNEL_BIT)
+#define LBR_USER	(1 << LBR_USER_BIT)
+#define LBR_JCC		(1 << LBR_JCC_BIT)
+#define LBR_REL_CALL	(1 << LBR_REL_CALL_BIT)
+#define LBR_IND_CALL	(1 << LBR_IND_CALL_BIT)
+#define LBR_RETURN	(1 << LBR_RETURN_BIT)
+#define LBR_REL_JMP	(1 << LBR_REL_JMP_BIT)
+#define LBR_IND_JMP	(1 << LBR_IND_JMP_BIT)
+#define LBR_FAR		(1 << LBR_FAR_BIT)
+
+#define LBR_PLM (LBR_KERNEL | LBR_USER)
+
+#define LBR_SEL_MASK	0x1ff /* valid bits in LBR_SELECT */
+
+#define LBR_ANY		 \
+	(LBR_JCC	|\
+	 LBR_REL_CALL	|\
+	 LBR_IND_CALL	|\
+	 LBR_RETURN	|\
+	 LBR_REL_JMP	|\
+	 LBR_IND_JMP	|\
+	 LBR_FAR)
+
+#define LBR_FROM_FLAG_MISPRED  (1ULL << 63)
+
+/*
  * We only support LBR implementations that have FREEZE_LBRS_ON_PMI
  * otherwise it becomes near impossible to get a reliable stack.
  */
@@ -147,8 +188,6 @@ static void intel_pmu_lbr_read_32(struct cpu_hw_events *cpuc)
 	cpuc->lbr_stack.nr = i;
 }
 
-#define LBR_FROM_FLAG_MISPRED  (1ULL << 63)
-
 /*
  * Due to lack of segmentation in Linux the effective address (offset)
  * is the same as the linear address, allowing us to merge the LIP and EIP
@@ -196,28 +235,95 @@ static void intel_pmu_lbr_read(void)
 		intel_pmu_lbr_read_64(cpuc);
 }
 
+/*
+ * Map interface branch filters onto LBR filters
+ */
+static const int nhm_lbr_sel_map[PERF_SAMPLE_BRANCH_MAX]=
+{
+	[PERF_SAMPLE_BRANCH_ANY]        = LBR_ANY,
+	[PERF_SAMPLE_BRANCH_USER]       = LBR_USER,
+	[PERF_SAMPLE_BRANCH_KERNEL]     = LBR_KERNEL,
+	[PERF_SAMPLE_BRANCH_ANY_RETURN] =
+		LBR_RETURN | LBR_REL_JMP | LBR_IND_JMP | LBR_FAR,
+	/*
+	 * NHM/WSM erratum: must include REL_JMP+IND_JMP to get CALL branches
+	 */
+	[PERF_SAMPLE_BRANCH_ANY_CALL] =
+		LBR_REL_CALL | LBR_IND_CALL | LBR_REL_JMP | LBR_IND_JMP | LBR_FAR,
+	/*
+	 * NHM/WSM erratum: must include IND_JMP to capture IND_CALL
+	 */
+	[PERF_SAMPLE_BRANCH_IND_CALL] = LBR_IND_CALL | LBR_IND_JMP,
+};
+
+static const int snb_lbr_sel_map[PERF_SAMPLE_BRANCH_MAX]=
+{
+	[PERF_SAMPLE_BRANCH_ANY]        = LBR_ANY,
+	[PERF_SAMPLE_BRANCH_USER]       = LBR_USER,
+	[PERF_SAMPLE_BRANCH_KERNEL]     = LBR_KERNEL,
+	[PERF_SAMPLE_BRANCH_ANY_RETURN] = LBR_RETURN | LBR_FAR,
+	[PERF_SAMPLE_BRANCH_ANY_CALL]   = LBR_REL_CALL | LBR_IND_CALL | LBR_FAR,
+	[PERF_SAMPLE_BRANCH_IND_CALL]   = LBR_IND_CALL,
+};
+
+/* core */
 static void intel_pmu_lbr_init_core(void)
 {
 	x86_pmu.lbr_nr     = 4;
 	x86_pmu.lbr_tos    = MSR_LBR_TOS;
 	x86_pmu.lbr_from   = MSR_LBR_CORE_FROM;
 	x86_pmu.lbr_to     = MSR_LBR_CORE_TO;
+
+	pr_cont("4-deep LBR, ");
 }
 
+/* nehalem/westmere */
 static void intel_pmu_lbr_init_nhm(void)
 {
 	x86_pmu.lbr_nr     = 16;
 	x86_pmu.lbr_tos    = MSR_LBR_TOS;
 	x86_pmu.lbr_from   = MSR_LBR_NHM_FROM;
 	x86_pmu.lbr_to     = MSR_LBR_NHM_TO;
+
+	x86_pmu.lbr_sel_mask = LBR_SEL_MASK;
+	x86_pmu.lbr_sel_map  = nhm_lbr_sel_map;
+
+	pr_cont("16-deep LBR, ");
+}
+
+/* sandy bridge */
+static void intel_pmu_lbr_init_snb(void)
+{
+	x86_pmu.lbr_nr	 = 16;
+	x86_pmu.lbr_tos	 = MSR_LBR_TOS;
+	x86_pmu.lbr_from = MSR_LBR_NHM_FROM;
+	x86_pmu.lbr_to   = MSR_LBR_NHM_TO;
+
+	x86_pmu.lbr_sel_mask = LBR_SEL_MASK;
+	x86_pmu.lbr_sel_map  = snb_lbr_sel_map;
+
+	pr_cont("16-deep LBR, ");
 }
 
+/* atom */
 static void intel_pmu_lbr_init_atom(void)
 {
+	/*
+	 * only models starting at stepping 10 seems
+	 * to have an operational LBR which can freeze
+	 * on PMU interrupt
+	 */
+	if (boot_cpu_data.x86_mask < 10) {
+		pr_cont("LBR disabled due to erratum");
+		return;
+	}
+
 	x86_pmu.lbr_nr	   = 8;
 	x86_pmu.lbr_tos    = MSR_LBR_TOS;
 	x86_pmu.lbr_from   = MSR_LBR_CORE_FROM;
 	x86_pmu.lbr_to     = MSR_LBR_CORE_TO;
+
+	pr_cont("8-deep LBR, ");
 }
 
 #endif /* CONFIG_CPU_SUP_INTEL */
-- 
1.7.4.1


  parent reply	other threads:[~2011-10-06 14:52 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 65+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2011-10-06 14:49 [PATCH 00/12] perf_events: add support for sampling taken branches Stephane Eranian
2011-10-06 14:49 ` [PATCH 01/12] perf_events: add generic taken branch sampling support Stephane Eranian
2011-10-06 16:57   ` Peter Zijlstra
2011-10-07 10:28     ` Stephane Eranian
2011-10-07 10:32       ` Peter Zijlstra
2011-10-07 10:44         ` Stephane Eranian
2011-10-06 17:01   ` Peter Zijlstra
2011-10-06 14:49 ` [PATCH 02/12] perf_events: add Intel LBR MSR definitions Stephane Eranian
2011-10-06 14:49 ` [PATCH 03/12] perf_events: add Intel X86 LBR sharing logic Stephane Eranian
2011-10-06 14:49 ` [PATCH 04/12] perf_events: sync branch stack sampling with X86 precise_sampling Stephane Eranian
2011-10-06 17:25   ` Peter Zijlstra
2011-10-07 10:34     ` Stephane Eranian
2011-10-07 10:37       ` Peter Zijlstra
2011-10-06 14:49 ` Stephane Eranian [this message]
2011-10-06 14:49 ` [PATCH 06/12] perf_events: implement PERF_SAMPLE_BRANCH for Intel X86 Stephane Eranian
2011-10-06 17:54   ` Peter Zijlstra
2011-10-06 18:05   ` Peter Zijlstra
2011-10-06 14:49 ` [PATCH 07/12] perf_events: add LBR software filter support " Stephane Eranian
2011-10-06 15:32   ` Andi Kleen
2011-10-06 16:43     ` Peter Zijlstra
2011-10-06 17:14       ` Andi Kleen
2011-10-10  6:08         ` Ingo Molnar
2011-10-10  9:39           ` Peter Zijlstra
2011-10-07  7:06       ` Masami Hiramatsu
2011-10-07 10:38     ` Stephane Eranian
2011-10-07 10:40       ` Stephane Eranian
2011-10-07 10:42         ` Peter Zijlstra
2011-10-07 10:49           ` Stephane Eranian
2011-10-07 11:18             ` Peter Zijlstra
2011-10-07 11:21             ` Peter Zijlstra
2011-10-07 11:54               ` Masami Hiramatsu
2011-10-07 13:31                 ` [PATCH] x86: Fix insn decoder for longer instruction Masami Hiramatsu
2011-10-10  7:04                   ` Ingo Molnar
2011-10-10  6:09                 ` [PATCH 07/12] perf_events: add LBR software filter support for Intel X86 Ingo Molnar
2011-10-10 14:05                   ` Masami Hiramatsu
2011-10-10 14:45                     ` Andi Kleen
2011-10-11 12:59                       ` Masami Hiramatsu
2011-10-12  7:06                         ` Ingo Molnar
2011-10-13 10:54                           ` Masami Hiramatsu
2011-10-13 11:01                           ` [RFC PATCH] x86: Add a sanity test of x86 decoder Masami Hiramatsu
2011-10-18  6:54                             ` Ingo Molnar
2011-10-19  4:29                               ` Masami Hiramatsu
2011-10-19  6:44                                 ` Ingo Molnar
2011-10-20 14:01                                   ` [RFC PATCH v2 1/2] " Masami Hiramatsu
2011-11-18 23:16                                     ` [tip:perf/core] x86, perf: Add a build-time sanity test to the " tip-bot for Masami Hiramatsu
2011-10-20 14:01                                   ` [RFC PATCH v2 2/2] [RESEND] x86: Fix insn decoder for longer instruction Masami Hiramatsu
2011-10-07 15:42             ` [PATCH 07/12] perf_events: add LBR software filter support for Intel X86 Andi Kleen
2011-10-07 11:25       ` Masami Hiramatsu
2011-10-07 11:40         ` Peter Zijlstra
2011-10-07 15:44           ` Andi Kleen
2011-10-07 15:09         ` Andi Kleen
2011-10-07 16:05           ` Peter Zijlstra
2011-10-06 14:49 ` [PATCH 08/12] perf_events: disable PERF_SAMPLE_BRANCH_* when not supported Stephane Eranian
2011-10-06 18:53   ` Peter Zijlstra
2011-10-06 14:49 ` [PATCH 09/12] perf_events: add hook to flush branch_stack on context switch Stephane Eranian
2011-10-06 14:49 ` [PATCH 10/12] perf: add code to support PERF_SAMPLE_BRANCH_STACK Stephane Eranian
2011-10-06 18:50   ` Peter Zijlstra
2011-10-07 10:25     ` Stephane Eranian
2011-10-07 10:27       ` Peter Zijlstra
2011-10-06 14:49 ` [PATCH 11/12] perf: add support for sampling taken branch to perf record Stephane Eranian
2011-10-06 14:49 ` [PATCH 12/12] perf: add support for taken branch sampling to perf report Stephane Eranian
2011-10-06 15:25 ` [PATCH 00/12] perf_events: add support for sampling taken branches Andi Kleen
2011-10-07 10:23   ` Stephane Eranian
2011-10-06 18:32 ` Peter Zijlstra
2011-10-06 21:41   ` Stephane Eranian

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=1317912555-9559-6-git-send-email-eranian@google.com \
    --to=eranian@google.com \
    --cc=acme@redhat.com \
    --cc=andi@firstfloor.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=ming.m.lin@intel.com \
    --cc=mingo@elte.hu \
    --cc=peterz@infradead.org \
    --cc=ravitillo@lbl.gov \
    --cc=robert.richter@amd.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).