From: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
To: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
Cc: Andi Kleen <andi@firstfloor.org>,
Stephane Eranian <eranian@google.com>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, acme@redhat.com,
ming.m.lin@intel.com, robert.richter@amd.com, ravitillo@lbl.gov,
"masami.hiramatsu.pt" <masami.hiramatsu.pt@hitachi.com>,
"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@linux.intel.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 07/12] perf_events: add LBR software filter support for Intel X86
Date: Mon, 10 Oct 2011 11:39:41 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1318239581.14400.5.camel@laptop> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20111010060810.GF32173@elte.hu>
On Mon, 2011-10-10 at 08:08 +0200, Ingo Molnar wrote:
> FUD is not how we approach these things - you need to say something
> specific.
Its Andi, of course its FUD. I mean, he's been telling us to use IRQs
for the PMI instead of NMIs for a while now. If we were to do something
daft like that this whole feature, which he does like, would be
useless/broken.
He really can't seem to make up his mind.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2011-10-10 9:33 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 65+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2011-10-06 14:49 [PATCH 00/12] perf_events: add support for sampling taken branches Stephane Eranian
2011-10-06 14:49 ` [PATCH 01/12] perf_events: add generic taken branch sampling support Stephane Eranian
2011-10-06 16:57 ` Peter Zijlstra
2011-10-07 10:28 ` Stephane Eranian
2011-10-07 10:32 ` Peter Zijlstra
2011-10-07 10:44 ` Stephane Eranian
2011-10-06 17:01 ` Peter Zijlstra
2011-10-06 14:49 ` [PATCH 02/12] perf_events: add Intel LBR MSR definitions Stephane Eranian
2011-10-06 14:49 ` [PATCH 03/12] perf_events: add Intel X86 LBR sharing logic Stephane Eranian
2011-10-06 14:49 ` [PATCH 04/12] perf_events: sync branch stack sampling with X86 precise_sampling Stephane Eranian
2011-10-06 17:25 ` Peter Zijlstra
2011-10-07 10:34 ` Stephane Eranian
2011-10-07 10:37 ` Peter Zijlstra
2011-10-06 14:49 ` [PATCH 05/12] perf_events: add LBR mappings for PERF_SAMPLE_BRANCH filters Stephane Eranian
2011-10-06 14:49 ` [PATCH 06/12] perf_events: implement PERF_SAMPLE_BRANCH for Intel X86 Stephane Eranian
2011-10-06 17:54 ` Peter Zijlstra
2011-10-06 18:05 ` Peter Zijlstra
2011-10-06 14:49 ` [PATCH 07/12] perf_events: add LBR software filter support " Stephane Eranian
2011-10-06 15:32 ` Andi Kleen
2011-10-06 16:43 ` Peter Zijlstra
2011-10-06 17:14 ` Andi Kleen
2011-10-10 6:08 ` Ingo Molnar
2011-10-10 9:39 ` Peter Zijlstra [this message]
2011-10-07 7:06 ` Masami Hiramatsu
2011-10-07 10:38 ` Stephane Eranian
2011-10-07 10:40 ` Stephane Eranian
2011-10-07 10:42 ` Peter Zijlstra
2011-10-07 10:49 ` Stephane Eranian
2011-10-07 11:18 ` Peter Zijlstra
2011-10-07 11:21 ` Peter Zijlstra
2011-10-07 11:54 ` Masami Hiramatsu
2011-10-07 13:31 ` [PATCH] x86: Fix insn decoder for longer instruction Masami Hiramatsu
2011-10-10 7:04 ` Ingo Molnar
2011-10-10 6:09 ` [PATCH 07/12] perf_events: add LBR software filter support for Intel X86 Ingo Molnar
2011-10-10 14:05 ` Masami Hiramatsu
2011-10-10 14:45 ` Andi Kleen
2011-10-11 12:59 ` Masami Hiramatsu
2011-10-12 7:06 ` Ingo Molnar
2011-10-13 10:54 ` Masami Hiramatsu
2011-10-13 11:01 ` [RFC PATCH] x86: Add a sanity test of x86 decoder Masami Hiramatsu
2011-10-18 6:54 ` Ingo Molnar
2011-10-19 4:29 ` Masami Hiramatsu
2011-10-19 6:44 ` Ingo Molnar
2011-10-20 14:01 ` [RFC PATCH v2 1/2] " Masami Hiramatsu
2011-11-18 23:16 ` [tip:perf/core] x86, perf: Add a build-time sanity test to the " tip-bot for Masami Hiramatsu
2011-10-20 14:01 ` [RFC PATCH v2 2/2] [RESEND] x86: Fix insn decoder for longer instruction Masami Hiramatsu
2011-10-07 15:42 ` [PATCH 07/12] perf_events: add LBR software filter support for Intel X86 Andi Kleen
2011-10-07 11:25 ` Masami Hiramatsu
2011-10-07 11:40 ` Peter Zijlstra
2011-10-07 15:44 ` Andi Kleen
2011-10-07 15:09 ` Andi Kleen
2011-10-07 16:05 ` Peter Zijlstra
2011-10-06 14:49 ` [PATCH 08/12] perf_events: disable PERF_SAMPLE_BRANCH_* when not supported Stephane Eranian
2011-10-06 18:53 ` Peter Zijlstra
2011-10-06 14:49 ` [PATCH 09/12] perf_events: add hook to flush branch_stack on context switch Stephane Eranian
2011-10-06 14:49 ` [PATCH 10/12] perf: add code to support PERF_SAMPLE_BRANCH_STACK Stephane Eranian
2011-10-06 18:50 ` Peter Zijlstra
2011-10-07 10:25 ` Stephane Eranian
2011-10-07 10:27 ` Peter Zijlstra
2011-10-06 14:49 ` [PATCH 11/12] perf: add support for sampling taken branch to perf record Stephane Eranian
2011-10-06 14:49 ` [PATCH 12/12] perf: add support for taken branch sampling to perf report Stephane Eranian
2011-10-06 15:25 ` [PATCH 00/12] perf_events: add support for sampling taken branches Andi Kleen
2011-10-07 10:23 ` Stephane Eranian
2011-10-06 18:32 ` Peter Zijlstra
2011-10-06 21:41 ` Stephane Eranian
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1318239581.14400.5.camel@laptop \
--to=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=acme@redhat.com \
--cc=andi@firstfloor.org \
--cc=eranian@google.com \
--cc=hpa@linux.intel.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=masami.hiramatsu.pt@hitachi.com \
--cc=ming.m.lin@intel.com \
--cc=mingo@elte.hu \
--cc=ravitillo@lbl.gov \
--cc=robert.richter@amd.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).