From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1753944Ab1JJMIR (ORCPT ); Mon, 10 Oct 2011 08:08:17 -0400 Received: from merlin.infradead.org ([205.233.59.134]:55914 "EHLO merlin.infradead.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752787Ab1JJMIP (ORCPT ); Mon, 10 Oct 2011 08:08:15 -0400 Subject: Re: [PATCH 00/11] IO-less dirty throttling v12 From: Peter Zijlstra To: Wu Fengguang Cc: linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org, Andrew Morton , Jan Kara , Christoph Hellwig , Dave Chinner , Greg Thelen , Minchan Kim , Vivek Goyal , Andrea Righi , linux-mm , LKML In-Reply-To: <20111003134228.090592370@intel.com> References: <20111003134228.090592370@intel.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Date: Mon, 10 Oct 2011 14:14:06 +0200 Message-ID: <1318248846.14400.21.camel@laptop> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Evolution 2.32.2 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Mon, 2011-10-03 at 21:42 +0800, Wu Fengguang wrote: > This is the minimal IO-less balance_dirty_pages() changes that are expected to > be regression free (well, except for NFS). I can't seem to get around reviewing these patches in detail, but fwiw I'm fine with pushing fwd with this set (plus a possible NFS fix). I don't see a reason to strip it down even further. So I guess that's: Acked-by: Peter Zijlstra