The Linux Kernel Mailing List
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Guan Xuetao <gxt@mprc.pku.edu.cn>
To: Axel Lin <axel.lin@gmail.com>, Michal Marek <mmarek@suse.cz>,
	Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	Alessandro Zummo <a.zummo@towertech.it>,
	rtc-linux@googlegroups.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH] rtc: rtc-puv3: Add __devinit and __devexit markers for probe and remove
Date: Tue, 18 Oct 2011 15:22:21 +0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <1318922541.1789.36.camel@epip-laptop> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1317824987.2674.1.camel@phoenix>

Hi Axel,
The patch yield following warnings:

WARNING: drivers/rtc/built-in.o(.data+0x90): Section mismatch in
reference from the variable puv3_rtcdrv to the
function .devinit.text:puv3_rtc_probe()
The variable puv3_rtcdrv references
the function __devinit puv3_rtc_probe()
If the reference is valid then annotate the
variable with __init* or __refdata (see linux/init.h) or name the
variable:
*driver, *_template, *_timer, *_sht, *_ops, *_probe, *_probe_one,
*_console

WARNING: drivers/rtc/built-in.o(.data+0x94): Section mismatch in
reference from the variable puv3_rtcdrv to the
function .devexit.text:puv3_rtc_remove()
The variable puv3_rtcdrv references
the function __devexit puv3_rtc_remove()
If the reference is valid then annotate the
variable with __exit* (see linux/init.h) or name the variable:
*driver, *_template, *_timer, *_sht, *_ops, *_probe, *_probe_one,
*_console

WARNING: drivers/built-in.o(.data+0x6c04): Section mismatch in reference
from the variable puv3_rtcdrv to the
function .devinit.text:puv3_rtc_probe()
The variable puv3_rtcdrv references
the function __devinit puv3_rtc_probe()
If the reference is valid then annotate the
variable with __init* or __refdata (see linux/init.h) or name the
variable:
*driver, *_template, *_timer, *_sht, *_ops, *_probe, *_probe_one,
*_console

WARNING: drivers/built-in.o(.data+0x6c08): Section mismatch in reference
from the variable puv3_rtcdrv to the
function .devexit.text:puv3_rtc_remove()
The variable puv3_rtcdrv references
the function __devexit puv3_rtc_remove()
If the reference is valid then annotate the
variable with __exit* (see linux/init.h) or name the variable:
*driver, *_template, *_timer, *_sht, *_ops, *_probe, *_probe_one,
*_console

WARNING: vmlinux.o(.data+0x1126c): Section mismatch in reference from
the variable puv3_rtcdrv to the function .devinit.text:puv3_rtc_probe()
The variable puv3_rtcdrv references
the function __devinit puv3_rtc_probe()
If the reference is valid then annotate the
variable with __init* or __refdata (see linux/init.h) or name the
variable:
*driver, *_template, *_timer, *_sht, *_ops, *_probe, *_probe_one,
*_console

WARNING: vmlinux.o(.data+0x11270): Section mismatch in reference from
the variable puv3_rtcdrv to the function .devexit.text:puv3_rtc_remove()
The variable puv3_rtcdrv references
the function __devexit puv3_rtc_remove()
If the reference is valid then annotate the
variable with __exit* (see linux/init.h) or name the variable:
*driver, *_template, *_timer, *_sht, *_ops, *_probe, *_probe_one,
*_console

For puv3_rtc_probe, I think it should be in the white-list, but warnings
are yielded.
For puv3_rtc_remove, the warning could be disappeared by modifying
__devexit to __exit, however is it proper?

Also,
Cc: Michal Marek <mmarek@suse.cz>
Cc: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>

Any advice is appreciated, thanks.

Guan Xuetao


On Wed, 2011-10-05 at 22:29 +0800, Axel Lin wrote:
> Signed-off-by: Axel Lin <axel.lin@gmail.com>
> ---
>  drivers/rtc/rtc-puv3.c |    4 ++--
>  1 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/rtc/rtc-puv3.c b/drivers/rtc/rtc-puv3.c
> index b3eba3c..e4b6880 100644
> --- a/drivers/rtc/rtc-puv3.c
> +++ b/drivers/rtc/rtc-puv3.c
> @@ -220,7 +220,7 @@ static void puv3_rtc_enable(struct platform_device *pdev, int en)
>  	}
>  }
>  
> -static int puv3_rtc_remove(struct platform_device *dev)
> +static int __devexit puv3_rtc_remove(struct platform_device *dev)
>  {
>  	struct rtc_device *rtc = platform_get_drvdata(dev);
>  
> @@ -236,7 +236,7 @@ static int puv3_rtc_remove(struct platform_device *dev)
>  	return 0;
>  }
>  
> -static int puv3_rtc_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
> +static int __devinit puv3_rtc_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
>  {
>  	struct rtc_device *rtc;
>  	struct resource *res;



  parent reply	other threads:[~2011-10-18  7:23 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2011-10-05 14:29 [PATCH] rtc: rtc-puv3: Add __devinit and __devexit markers for probe and remove Axel Lin
2011-10-11 10:25 ` Guan Xuetao
2011-10-12  2:58   ` Guan Xuetao
2011-10-18  7:22 ` Guan Xuetao [this message]
2011-10-18  8:44   ` Axel Lin
2011-10-18 10:35     ` Guan Xuetao
2011-10-21  8:32   ` Michal Marek
2011-10-21  8:42     ` Michal Marek

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=1318922541.1789.36.camel@epip-laptop \
    --to=gxt@mprc.pku.edu.cn \
    --cc=a.zummo@towertech.it \
    --cc=arnd@arndb.de \
    --cc=axel.lin@gmail.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mmarek@suse.cz \
    --cc=rtc-linux@googlegroups.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox