From: Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>
To: axboe@kernel.dk, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, vgoyal@redhat.com
Cc: ctalbott@google.com, ni@google.com, Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>
Subject: [PATCH 04/10] block: pass around REQ_* flags instead of broken down booleans during request alloc/free
Date: Tue, 18 Oct 2011 21:26:18 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1318998384-22525-5-git-send-email-tj@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1318998384-22525-1-git-send-email-tj@kernel.org>
blk_alloc_request() and freed_request() take different combinations of
REQ_* @flags, @priv and @is_sync when @flags is superset of the latter
two. Make them take @flags only. This cleans up the code a bit and
will ease updating allocation related REQ_* flags.
This patch doesn't introduce any functional difference.
Signed-off-by: Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>
Cc: Jens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk>
---
block/blk-core.c | 36 +++++++++++++++++-------------------
1 files changed, 17 insertions(+), 19 deletions(-)
diff --git a/block/blk-core.c b/block/blk-core.c
index a995141..fafa669 100644
--- a/block/blk-core.c
+++ b/block/blk-core.c
@@ -575,7 +575,7 @@ static inline void blk_free_request(struct request_queue *q, struct request *rq)
}
static struct request *
-blk_alloc_request(struct request_queue *q, int flags, int priv, gfp_t gfp_mask)
+blk_alloc_request(struct request_queue *q, unsigned int flags, gfp_t gfp_mask)
{
struct request *rq = mempool_alloc(q->rq.rq_pool, gfp_mask);
@@ -586,12 +586,10 @@ blk_alloc_request(struct request_queue *q, int flags, int priv, gfp_t gfp_mask)
rq->cmd_flags = flags | REQ_ALLOCED;
- if (priv) {
- if (unlikely(elv_set_request(q, rq, gfp_mask))) {
- mempool_free(rq, q->rq.rq_pool);
- return NULL;
- }
- rq->cmd_flags |= REQ_ELVPRIV;
+ if ((flags & REQ_ELVPRIV) &&
+ unlikely(elv_set_request(q, rq, gfp_mask))) {
+ mempool_free(rq, q->rq.rq_pool);
+ return NULL;
}
return rq;
@@ -650,12 +648,13 @@ static void __freed_request(struct request_queue *q, int sync)
* A request has just been released. Account for it, update the full and
* congestion status, wake up any waiters. Called under q->queue_lock.
*/
-static void freed_request(struct request_queue *q, int sync, int priv)
+static void freed_request(struct request_queue *q, unsigned int flags)
{
struct request_list *rl = &q->rq;
+ int sync = rw_is_sync(flags);
rl->count[sync]--;
- if (priv)
+ if (flags & REQ_ELVPRIV)
rl->elvpriv--;
__freed_request(q, sync);
@@ -695,7 +694,7 @@ static struct request *get_request(struct request_queue *q, int rw_flags,
struct request_list *rl = &q->rq;
struct io_context *ioc = NULL;
const bool is_sync = rw_is_sync(rw_flags) != 0;
- int may_queue, priv = 0;
+ int may_queue;
may_queue = elv_may_queue(q, rw_flags);
if (may_queue == ELV_MQUEUE_NO)
@@ -739,17 +738,17 @@ static struct request *get_request(struct request_queue *q, int rw_flags,
rl->count[is_sync]++;
rl->starved[is_sync] = 0;
- if (blk_rq_should_init_elevator(bio)) {
- priv = !test_bit(QUEUE_FLAG_ELVSWITCH, &q->queue_flags);
- if (priv)
- rl->elvpriv++;
+ if (blk_rq_should_init_elevator(bio) &&
+ !test_bit(QUEUE_FLAG_ELVSWITCH, &q->queue_flags)) {
+ rw_flags |= REQ_ELVPRIV;
+ rl->elvpriv++;
}
if (blk_queue_io_stat(q))
rw_flags |= REQ_IO_STAT;
spin_unlock_irq(q->queue_lock);
- rq = blk_alloc_request(q, rw_flags, priv, gfp_mask);
+ rq = blk_alloc_request(q, rw_flags, gfp_mask);
if (unlikely(!rq)) {
/*
* Allocation failed presumably due to memory. Undo anything
@@ -759,7 +758,7 @@ static struct request *get_request(struct request_queue *q, int rw_flags,
* wait queue, but this is pretty rare.
*/
spin_lock_irq(q->queue_lock);
- freed_request(q, is_sync, priv);
+ freed_request(q, rw_flags);
/*
* in the very unlikely event that allocation failed and no
@@ -1051,14 +1050,13 @@ void __blk_put_request(struct request_queue *q, struct request *req)
* it didn't come out of our reserved rq pools
*/
if (req->cmd_flags & REQ_ALLOCED) {
- int is_sync = rq_is_sync(req) != 0;
- int priv = req->cmd_flags & REQ_ELVPRIV;
+ unsigned int flags = req->cmd_flags;
BUG_ON(!list_empty(&req->queuelist));
BUG_ON(!hlist_unhashed(&req->hash));
blk_free_request(q, req);
- freed_request(q, is_sync, priv);
+ freed_request(q, flags);
}
}
EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(__blk_put_request);
--
1.7.3.1
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2011-10-19 4:28 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 43+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2011-10-19 4:26 [PATCHSET block/for-next] fix request_queue life-cycle management Tejun Heo
2011-10-19 4:26 ` [PATCH 01/10] block: make gendisk hold a reference to its queue Tejun Heo
2011-10-19 4:26 ` [PATCH 02/10] block: fix genhd refcounting in blkio_policy_parse_and_set() Tejun Heo
2011-10-19 13:26 ` Vivek Goyal
2011-10-19 16:29 ` Tejun Heo
2011-10-19 16:59 ` Vivek Goyal
2011-10-19 22:05 ` Tejun Heo
2011-10-19 22:07 ` Tejun Heo
2011-10-19 23:51 ` Tejun Heo
2011-10-20 13:41 ` Vivek Goyal
2011-10-20 16:11 ` Tejun Heo
2011-10-20 16:16 ` Kay Sievers
2011-10-20 17:50 ` Vivek Goyal
2011-10-20 17:47 ` Vivek Goyal
2011-10-19 4:26 ` [PATCH 03/10] block: move blk_throtl prototypes to block/blk.h Tejun Heo
2011-10-19 13:33 ` Vivek Goyal
2011-10-19 4:26 ` Tejun Heo [this message]
2011-10-19 13:44 ` [PATCH 04/10] block: pass around REQ_* flags instead of broken down booleans during request alloc/free Vivek Goyal
2011-10-19 16:31 ` Tejun Heo
2011-10-19 4:26 ` [PATCH 05/10] block: drop unnecessary blk_get/put_queue() in scsi_cmd_ioctl() and blk_get_tg() Tejun Heo
2011-10-19 13:52 ` Vivek Goyal
2011-10-19 16:35 ` Tejun Heo
2011-10-19 4:26 ` [PATCH 06/10] block: reorganize queue draining Tejun Heo
2011-10-19 4:26 ` [PATCH 07/10] block: reorganize throtl_get_tg() and blk_throtl_bio() Tejun Heo
2011-10-19 14:56 ` Vivek Goyal
2011-10-19 17:06 ` Tejun Heo
2011-10-19 17:19 ` Vivek Goyal
2011-10-19 17:30 ` Tejun Heo
2011-10-19 17:45 ` Vivek Goyal
2011-10-19 17:49 ` Tejun Heo
2011-10-19 4:26 ` [PATCH 08/10] block: make get_request[_wait]() fail if queue is dead Tejun Heo
2011-10-19 15:22 ` Vivek Goyal
2011-10-19 4:26 ` [PATCH 09/10] block: drop @tsk from attempt_plug_merge() and explain sync rules Tejun Heo
2011-10-19 4:26 ` [PATCH 10/10] block: fix request_queue lifetime handling by making blk_queue_cleanup() proper shutdown Tejun Heo
2011-10-19 12:43 ` Jens Axboe
2011-10-19 17:13 ` Tejun Heo
2011-10-19 18:04 ` Jens Axboe
2011-10-19 16:18 ` Vivek Goyal
2011-10-19 17:12 ` Tejun Heo
2011-10-19 17:29 ` Vivek Goyal
2011-10-19 17:33 ` Tejun Heo
2011-10-19 4:29 ` [PATCHSET block/for-next] fix request_queue life-cycle management Tejun Heo
2011-10-19 12:44 ` Jens Axboe
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1318998384-22525-5-git-send-email-tj@kernel.org \
--to=tj@kernel.org \
--cc=axboe@kernel.dk \
--cc=ctalbott@google.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=ni@google.com \
--cc=vgoyal@redhat.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).