From: "Guy, Wey-Yi" <wey-yi.w.guy@intel.com>
To: Norbert Preining <preining@logic.at>
Cc: David Rientjes <rientjes@google.com>,
"linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
"ipw3945-devel@lists.sourceforge.net"
<ipw3945-devel@lists.sourceforge.net>,
"ilw@linux.intel.com" <ilw@linux.intel.com>,
"linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org" <linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org>,
Pekka Enberg <penberg@cs.helsinki.fi>
Subject: Re: iwlagn is getting very shaky
Date: Wed, 19 Oct 2011 18:32:19 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1319074339.31823.68.camel@wwguy-huron> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20111020020225.GO11060@gamma.logic.tuwien.ac.at>
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1791 bytes --]
On Wed, 2011-10-19 at 19:02 -0700, Norbert Preining wrote:
> On Mi, 19 Okt 2011, wwguy wrote:
> > instead of having you to revert the patch I ask you to do, could you
> > please just apply the patch I attach here and see if it make any
> > differences? it is also for debugging purpose, so please check the dmesg
> > log.
>
> Do you mean the patch you send with a strange date:
> Signed-off-by: Wey-Yi Guy <wey-yi.w.guy@intel.com>
> ---
> drivers/net/wireless/iwlwifi/iwl-agn-tx.c | 5 +++++
> 1 files changed, 5 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/net/wireless/iwlwifi/iwl-agn-tx.c
> b/drivers/net/wireless/iwlwifi/iwl-agn-tx.c
> index 863c43f..5a87071 100644
> --- a/drivers/net/wireless/iwlwifi/iwl-agn-tx.c
> +++ b/drivers/net/wireless/iwlwifi/iwl-agn-tx.c
> @@ -812,8 +812,13 @@ int iwlagn_rx_reply_tx(struct iwl_priv *priv, struct
> iwl_rx_mem_buffer *rxb,
> if (status == TX_STATUS_FAIL_PASSIVE_NO_RX &&
> iwl_is_associated_ctx(ctx) && ctx->vif &&
> ctx->vif->type == NL80211_IFTYPE_STATION) {
> +#if 0
> ctx->last_tx_rejected = true;
> iwl_trans_stop_queue(trans(priv), txq_id);
> +#endif
> +IWL_ERR(priv,
> + "Encounter TX_STATUS_FAIL_PASSIVE_NO_RX, am I on 5.2G band? (%d)\n",
> + txq_id);
>
> IWL_DEBUG_TX_REPLY(priv,
> "TXQ %d status %s (0x%08x) "
> --
> 1.7.0.4
>
> It does not apply at all, I cannot even find
> rejected
> in iwl-agn-tx.c.
>
> On which tree is that based, can you provide a patch against main
> git branch of Linus.
>
> Thanks.
>
Let's try this and see if apply. btw, are you on 5GHz?
Thanks
Wey
[-- Attachment #2: 0001-iwlagn-stop-queue-testing.patch --]
[-- Type: text/x-patch, Size: 1109 bytes --]
>From 78e955b90a8e259d180bfb962ef4558645d74a91 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Wey-Yi Guy <wey-yi.w.guy@intel.com>
Date: Wed, 19 Oct 2011 18:27:41 -0700
Subject: [PATCH 1/1] iwlagn: stop queue testing
Signed-off-by: Wey-Yi Guy <wey-yi.w.guy@intel.com>
---
drivers/net/wireless/iwlwifi/iwl-agn-lib.c | 6 ++++++
1 files changed, 6 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/net/wireless/iwlwifi/iwl-agn-lib.c b/drivers/net/wireless/iwlwifi/iwl-agn-lib.c
index 3bee0f1..d543686 100644
--- a/drivers/net/wireless/iwlwifi/iwl-agn-lib.c
+++ b/drivers/net/wireless/iwlwifi/iwl-agn-lib.c
@@ -191,8 +191,14 @@ static void iwlagn_set_tx_status(struct iwl_priv *priv,
if (status == TX_STATUS_FAIL_PASSIVE_NO_RX &&
iwl_is_associated_ctx(ctx) && ctx->vif &&
ctx->vif->type == NL80211_IFTYPE_STATION) {
+#if 0
ctx->last_tx_rejected = true;
iwl_stop_queue(priv, &priv->txq[txq_id]);
+#endif
+IWL_ERR(priv,
+ "Encounter TX_STATUS_FAIL_PASSIVE_NO_RX, am I on 5.2G band? (%d)\n",
+ txq_id);
+
}
IWL_DEBUG_TX_REPLY(priv, "TXQ %d status %s (0x%08x) rate_n_flags "
--
1.7.0.4
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2011-10-20 2:22 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 94+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2011-10-19 6:01 iwlagn is getting very shaky Norbert Preining
2011-10-19 6:09 ` David Rientjes
2011-10-19 6:11 ` Pekka Enberg
2011-10-19 5:55 ` Guy, Wey-Yi
2011-10-19 6:48 ` Norbert Preining
2011-10-19 6:15 ` Guy, Wey-Yi
2011-10-19 7:19 ` Pekka Enberg
2011-10-19 6:44 ` Guy, Wey-Yi
2011-10-20 9:12 ` Pekka Enberg
2011-10-19 6:39 ` Guy, Wey-Yi
2011-10-19 6:25 ` Norbert Preining
2011-10-19 5:48 ` Guy, Wey-Yi
2011-10-19 6:46 ` Norbert Preining
2011-10-19 6:13 ` Guy, Wey-Yi
2011-10-19 12:49 ` Norbert Preining
2011-10-19 15:31 ` wwguy
2011-10-20 2:02 ` Norbert Preining
2011-10-20 1:32 ` Guy, Wey-Yi [this message]
2011-10-20 2:51 ` Norbert Preining
2011-10-20 2:55 ` Guy, Wey-Yi W
2011-10-20 3:14 ` Norbert Preining
2011-10-20 5:30 ` David Rientjes
2011-10-20 4:59 ` Norbert Preining
2011-10-20 7:40 ` Johannes Berg
2011-10-20 13:45 ` Norbert Preining
2011-10-20 13:50 ` Johannes Berg
2011-10-20 13:54 ` Norbert Preining
2011-10-21 1:23 ` Norbert Preining
2011-10-21 7:26 ` Johannes Berg
2011-10-20 14:10 ` wwguy
2011-10-21 1:24 ` Norbert Preining
2011-10-23 21:26 ` David Rientjes
2011-10-26 2:50 ` Norbert Preining
2011-10-26 3:55 ` wwguy
2011-10-26 4:03 ` Norbert Preining
2011-10-26 4:00 ` wwguy
2011-10-26 4:34 ` Norbert Preining
2011-10-26 4:54 ` Richard Yao
2011-10-26 19:56 ` [Ilw] " wwguy
2011-10-26 19:36 ` wwguy
2011-11-02 3:13 ` Norbert Preining
2011-11-02 3:21 ` Guy, Wey-Yi
2011-11-04 0:56 ` Richard Yao
2011-11-04 4:58 ` Norbert Preining
2011-11-07 12:38 ` Norbert Preining
2011-11-07 23:37 ` Guy, Wey-Yi
2011-11-08 4:32 ` Norbert Preining
2011-11-08 8:07 ` Emmanuel Grumbach
2011-11-08 8:24 ` Emmanuel Grumbach
2011-11-09 5:11 ` Norbert Preining
2011-11-09 7:15 ` Emmanuel Grumbach
2011-11-21 3:06 ` Norbert Preining
2011-11-21 13:59 ` Emmanuel Grumbach
2011-11-21 23:24 ` Norbert Preining
2011-11-22 0:24 ` Norbert Preining
2011-11-22 5:13 ` Norbert Preining
2011-11-22 6:46 ` Emmanuel Grumbach
2011-11-22 6:48 ` Emmanuel Grumbach
2011-11-22 7:27 ` Norbert Preining
2011-11-22 7:45 ` Emmanuel Grumbach
2011-11-22 7:54 ` Norbert Preining
2011-11-22 8:11 ` Emmanuel Grumbach
2011-11-22 12:43 ` Norbert Preining
2011-11-22 14:15 ` Emmanuel Grumbach
2011-11-23 1:55 ` Norbert Preining
2011-11-24 6:47 ` Emmanuel Grumbach
2011-11-24 23:02 ` Norbert Preining
2011-11-25 4:50 ` Emmanuel Grumbach
2011-11-25 12:21 ` Norbert Preining
2011-11-25 12:31 ` Emmanuel Grumbach
2011-11-25 12:37 ` Norbert Preining
2011-11-27 6:38 ` Emmanuel Grumbach
2011-11-27 9:43 ` Emmanuel Grumbach
2011-11-27 9:46 ` Johannes Berg
2011-11-27 10:44 ` Emmanuel Grumbach
2011-11-28 3:56 ` Norbert Preining
[not found] ` <CANUX_P2kYiFCP8uAhLZC_kVEjoyxabRBx3Pn+ndtFus=6hJN7Q@mail.gmail.com>
2011-11-28 4:23 ` Norbert Preining
2011-11-28 6:33 ` Emmanuel Grumbach
2011-11-28 23:25 ` Norbert Preining
2011-11-29 6:59 ` Emmanuel Grumbach
2011-11-29 7:48 ` Jeff Chua
2011-11-29 7:50 ` Emmanuel Grumbach
2011-11-29 8:31 ` Johannes Berg
2011-11-29 9:19 ` Emmanuel Grumbach
2011-11-29 9:32 ` Norbert Preining
2011-12-01 3:17 ` Norbert Preining
2011-12-11 9:24 ` Emmanuel Grumbach
2011-12-11 19:56 ` Emmanuel Grumbach
2011-12-15 14:07 ` Johannes Berg
2011-11-16 13:40 ` Richard Yao
2011-11-21 3:03 ` Norbert Preining
2011-10-26 4:19 ` Richard Yao
2011-10-27 0:05 ` Fwd: " Richard Yao
2011-10-27 3:48 ` Guy, Wey-Yi W
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1319074339.31823.68.camel@wwguy-huron \
--to=wey-yi.w.guy@intel.com \
--cc=ilw@linux.intel.com \
--cc=ipw3945-devel@lists.sourceforge.net \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=penberg@cs.helsinki.fi \
--cc=preining@logic.at \
--cc=rientjes@google.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox